Persistence of immunological memory as a potential correlate of long-term, vaccine-induced protection against Ebola virus disease in humans.

Introduction: In the absence of clinical efficacy data, vaccine protective effect can be extrapolated from animals to humans, using an immunological biomarker in humans that correlates with protection in animals, in a statistical approach called immunobridging. Such an immunobridging approach was previously used to infer the likely protective effect of the heterologous two-dose Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen. However, this immunobridging model does not provide information on how the persistence of the vaccine-induced immune response relates to durability of protection in humans. Methods and results: In both humans and non-human primates, vaccine-induced circulating antibody levels appear to be very stable after an initial phase of contraction and are maintained for at least 3.8 years in humans (and at least 1.3 years in non-human primates). Immunological memory was also maintained over this period, as shown by the kinetics and magnitude of the anamnestic response following re-exposure to the Ebola virus glycoprotein antigen via booster vaccination with Ad26.ZEBOV in humans. In non-human primates, immunological memory was also formed as shown by an anamnestic response after high-dose, intramuscular injection with Ebola virus, but was not sufficient for protection against Ebola virus disease at later timepoints due to a decline in circulating antibodies and the fast kinetics of disease in the non-human primates model. Booster vaccination within three days of subsequent Ebola virus challenge in non-human primates resulted in protection from Ebola virus disease, i.e. before the anamnestic response was fully developed. Discussion: Humans infected with Ebola virus may benefit from the anamnestic response to prevent disease progression, as the incubation time is longer and progression of Ebola virus disease is slower as compared to non-human primates. Therefore, the persistence of vaccine-induced immune memory could be considered as a potential correlate of long-term protection against Ebola virus disease in humans, without the need for a booster.

A Recombinant MVA-Based RSV Vaccine Induces T-Cell and Antibody Responses That Cooperate in the Protection Against RSV Infection.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a respiratory disease with a potentially fatal outcome especially in infants and elderly individuals. Several vaccines failed in pivotal clinical trials, and to date, no vaccine against RSV has been licensed. We have developed an RSV vaccine based on the recombinant Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara-BN® (MVA-RSV), containing five RSV-specific antigens that induced antibody and T-cell responses, which is currently tested in clinical trials. Here, the immunological mechanisms of protection were evaluated to determine viral loads in lungs upon vaccination of mice with MVA-RSV followed by intranasal RSV challenge. Depletion of CD4 or CD8 T cells, serum transfer, and the use of genetically engineered mice lacking the ability to generate either RSV-specific antibodies (T11µMT), the IgA isotype (IgA knockout), or CD8 T cells (ß2M knockout) revealed that complete protection from RSV challenge is dependent on CD4 and CD8 T cells as well as antibodies, including IgA. Thus, MVA-RSV vaccination optimally protects against RSV infection by employing multiple arms of the adaptive immune system.

Nonhuman primate to human immunobridging to infer the protective effect of an Ebola virus vaccine candidate.

It has been proven challenging to conduct traditional efficacy trials for Ebola virus (EBOV) vaccines. In the absence of efficacy data, immunobridging is an approach to infer the likelihood of a vaccine protective effect, by translating vaccine immunogenicity in humans to a protective effect, using the relationship between vaccine immunogenicity and the desired outcome in a suitable animal model. We here propose to infer the protective effect of the Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccine regimen with an 8-week interval in humans by immunobridging. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy data were obtained for Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo vaccine regimens using a fully lethal EBOV Kikwit challenge model in cynomolgus monkeys (nonhuman primates [NHP]). The association between EBOV neutralizing antibodies, glycoprotein (GP)-binding antibodies, and GP-reactive T cells and survival in NHP was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Binding antibodies against the EBOV surface GP were identified as the immune parameter with the strongest correlation to survival post EBOV challenge, and used to infer the predicted protective effect of the vaccine in humans using published data from phase I studies. The human vaccine-elicited EBOV GP-binding antibody levels are in a range associated with significant protection against mortality in NHP. Based on this immunobridging analysis, the EBOV GP-specific-binding antibody levels elicited by the Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccine regimen in humans will likely provide protection against EBOV disease.

Characterization of the interaction between the human DNA topoisomerase IIbeta-binding protein 1 (TopBP1) and the cell division cycle 45 (Cdc45) protein.

TopBP1 (topoisomerase IIbeta-binding protein 1) is a BRCT [BRCA1 (breast-cancer susceptibility gene 1) C-terminal]-domain-rich protein that is structurally and functionally conserved throughout eukaryotic organisms. It is required for the initiation of DNA replication and for DNA repair and DNA damage signalling. Experiments with fission yeast and Xenopus revealed that the TopBP1 homologues of these organisms are required for chromatin loading of the replication protein Cdc45 (cell division cycle 45). To improve our understanding of the physiological functions of human TopBP1, we investigated the interplay between human TopBP1 and Cdc45 proteins in synchronized HeLa-S3 cells. Using GST (glutathione transferase) pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation techniques, we showed a direct interaction between TopBP1 and Cdc45 in vitro and in vivo. The use of deletion mutants in GST pull-down assays identified the first and second as well as the sixth BRCT domains of TopBP1 to be responsible for the functional interaction with Cdc45. Moreover, the interaction between Cdc45 and the first and second BRCT domains of TopBP1 inhibited their transcriptional activation both in yeast and mammalian one-hybrid systems. Both proteins interacted exclusively at the G(1)/S boundary of cell cycle; only weak interaction could be found at the G(2)/M boundary. The overexpression of the sixth BRCT domain led to diminished loading of Cdc45 on to chromatin. These results suggest that human TopBP1 is involved in the formation of the initiation complex of replication in human cells and is required for the recruitment of Cdc45 to origins of DNA replication.

The DNA topoisomerase IIbeta binding protein 1 (TopBP1) interacts with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1).

We investigated the physical association of the DNA topoisomerase IIbeta binding protein 1 (TopBP1), involved in DNA replication and repair but also in regulation of apoptosis, with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1). This enzyme plays a crucial role in DNA repair and interacts with many DNA replication/repair factors. It was shown that the sixth BRCA1 C-terminal (BRCT) domain of TopBP1 interacts with a protein fragment of PARP-1 in vitro containing the DNA-binding and the automodification domains. More significantly, the in vivo interaction of endogenous TopBP1 and PARP-1 proteins could be shown in HeLa-S3 cells by co-immunoprecipitation. TopBP1 and PARP-1 are localized within overlapping regions in the nucleus of HeLa-S3 cells as shown by immunofluorescence. Exposure to UVB light slightly enhanced the interaction between both proteins. Furthermore, TopBP1 was detected in nuclear regions where poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) synthesis takes place and is ADP-ribosylated by PARP-1. Finally, cellular (ADP-ribosyl)ating activity impairs binding of TopBP1 to Myc-interacting zinc finger protein-1 (Miz-1). The results indicate an influence of post-translational modifications of TopBP1 on its function during DNA repair.