Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Can Fam Physician ; 56(11): 1158-64, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21075999

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore what nursing home resident demographic, clinical, functional, and health services utilization characteristics influence a "do not hospitalize" designation. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Vancouver, BC. PARTICIPANTS: Extended care residents in 2 hospital-based and 4 free-standing nursing homes who died between 2001 and 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The designation of "do not hospitalize" on a resident's chart. RESULTS: Continuity of family physician care from admission to death (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33 to 3.49), a sudden and unexpected death (AHR 0.43, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.73), and age (AHR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.02) were independently associated with a "do not hospitalize" designation. CONCLUSION: The greater than 2-fold positive association of continuity of family physician care with a "do not hospitalize" designation is an interesting addition to the literature on how continuity of physician care matters.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Colúmbia Britânica , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Admissão do Paciente , Transferência de Pacientes , Relações Médico-Paciente , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
2.
Anesth Analg ; 111(6): 1460-6, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20889945

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: I.v. bolus oxytocin is used routinely during cesarean delivery to prevent postpartum hemorrhage. Its adverse hemodynamic effects are well known, resulting in a recent change in dose from 10 IU to 5. Whether a 5 IU bolus has any advantages over infusion alone is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that a 5 IU i.v. bolus of oxytocin before the initiation of a continuous infusion decreases the need for additional uterotonic drugs in the first 24 hours after delivery in women with risk factors for uterine atony undergoing cesarean delivery, compared with infusion alone. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted in 143 subjects undergoing cesarean delivery with at least 1 risk factor for uterine atony. Subjects received 5 IU bolus of oxytocin or normal saline i.v. over 30 seconds after umbilical cord clamping. All subjects received an infusion of 40 IU oxytocin in 500 mL normal saline over 30 minutes, followed by 20 IU in 1 L over 8 hours. The primary outcome was the need for additional uterotonics in the first 24 hours after delivery. Secondary outcomes included uterine tone as assessed by the surgeon (5-point Likert scale: 0 = "floppy," 4 = "rock hard"), estimated blood loss, side effects of bolus administration, and the oxytocin bolus-placental delivery interval. RESULTS: There was no difference in the need for additional uterotonic drugs in the first 24 hours between groups. There was a significant difference in uterine tone immediately after placental delivery (P < 0.01) (2.8 in the oxytocin group [95% confidence interval 2.6-3.0] vs 2.2 in the saline group [95% confidence interval 1.8-2.5]), which disappeared after 5 minutes. There were no differences in observed or reported side effects between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a 5 IU i.v. bolus of oxytocin added to an infusion did not alter the need for additional uterotonic drugs to prevent or treat postpartum hemorrhage in the first 24 hours in women undergoing cesarean delivery with risk factors for uterine atony, despite causing an initial stronger uterine contraction. Our study was not powered to find a difference in side effects between groups. These results suggest that an oxytocin infusion may be adequate without the need for a bolus, even in high-risk patients.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Ocitócicos/administração & dosagem , Ocitocina/administração & dosagem , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Contração Uterina/efeitos dos fármacos , Inércia Uterina/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Colúmbia Britânica , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Intravenosas , Modelos Logísticos , Razão de Chances , Ocitócicos/efeitos adversos , Ocitocina/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/fisiopatologia , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Cloreto de Sódio/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Inércia Uterina/etiologia , Inércia Uterina/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...