Premature Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Invasive Revascularization: Comparing STEMI to NSTEMI in a Population-Based Study of Young Patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) usually presents in older populations, where there are established demographic and outcome differences between ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI). No similar comparisons for young AMI exist. METHODS: We compared all index NSTEMI and STEMI hospitalizations in the young (18-45 years) requiring revascularization in Alberta, Canada. Outcomes were survival to discharge, and a composite of heart failure hospitalization, cardiac arrest hospitalization, and all-cause mortality at 1- and 5-years. RESULTS: There were 1679 patients included with an index AMI requiring revascularization (655 (39.0%) NSTEMI and 1024 (61.0%) STEMI). The population was disproportionately male (86%), particularly in STEMI (87.3%). Marked dyslipidemia (35%) and active smoking (42%) were common, with similar rates between groups. Percutaneous coronary intervention was used in 98.7% of STEMI and 91.5% of NSTEMI patients (P<0.001), with the remainder undergoing surgical revascularization. In-hospital mortality during index AMI was higher STEMI compared to NSTEMI patients (1.7% vs 0%, P<0.001). The rates of the composite outcome were similar between groups at 1- and 5-years of follow-up in patients who survived to index hospital discharge. After adjusting for sex, age, heart failure and/or cardiac arrest at index AMI, outcomes remained similar between groups at 1- and 5-years. CONCLUSIONS: In young patients with AMI, STEMI was a disproportionately male phenomenon and associated with higher mortality at index hospitalization. One-year and 5-year outcomes were similar between STEMI and NSTEMI in those discharged alive at index AMI. Smoking and dyslipidemia appear to be major risk factors in the young.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology Clinical Practice Update on Optimal Post Cardiac Arrest and Refractory Cardiac Arrest Patient Care.

Survival to hospital discharge among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is low and important regional differences in treatment practices and survival have been described. Since the 2017 publication of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society's position statement on OHCA care, multiple randomized controlled trials have helped to better define optimal post cardiac arrest care. This working group provides updated guidance on the timing of cardiac catheterization in patients with ST-elevation and without ST-segment elevation, on a revised temperature control strategy targeting normothermia instead of hypothermia, blood pressure, oxygenation, and ventilation parameters, and on the treatment of rhythmic and periodic electroencephalography patterns in patients with a resuscitated OHCA. In addition, prehospital trials have helped craft new expert opinions on antiarrhythmic strategies (amiodarone or lidocaine) and outline the potential role for double sequential defibrillation in patients with refractory cardiac arrest when equipment and training is available. Finally, we advocate for regionalized OHCA care systems with admissions to a hospital capable of integrating their post OHCA care with comprehensive on-site cardiovascular services and provide guidance on the potential role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with refractory cardiac arrest. We believe that knowledge translation through national harmonization and adoption of contemporary best practices has the potential to improve survival and functional outcomes in the OHCA population.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology 2023 Focused Update of the Guidelines for the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy.

Antiplatelet therapy (APT) is the foundation of treatment and prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Selecting the optimal APT strategies to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, while balancing bleeding risk, requires ongoing review of clinical trials. Appended, the focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology guidelines for the use of APT provides recommendations on the following topics: (1) use of acetylsalicylic acid in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; (2) dual APT (DAPT) duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high bleeding risk; (3) potent DAPT (P2Y12 inhibitor) choice in patients who present with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and possible DAPT de-escalation strategies after PCI; (4) choice and duration of DAPT in ACS patients who are medically treated without revascularization; (5) pretreatment with DAPT (P2Y12 inhibitor) before elective or nonelective coronary angiography; (6) perioperative and longer-term APT management in patients who require coronary artery bypass grafting surgery; and (7) use of APT in patients with atrial fibrillation who require oral anticoagulation after PCI or medically managed ACS. These recommendations are all on the basis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted as part of the development of these guidelines, provided in the Supplementary Material.

Reperfusion Delays and Outcomes Among Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With and Without Cardiogenic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Mortality remains high in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), and early reperfusion has been shown to improve outcomes. We analyzed the association between first medical contact (FMC)-to-percutaneous coronary angiography time with mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with STEMI with and without CS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority STEMI registry, including all patients with STEMI who received primary percutaneous coronary angiography between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020, and stratified them by presence or absence of CS at hospital arrival. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, the secondary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of the first occurrence of mortality, cardiac arrest, heart failure, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebrovascular accident, or reinfarction. Mixed effects logistic regression with restricted cubic splines was used to estimate the relationships between FMC-to-device time and the outcomes in the CS and non-CS groups. RESULTS: 2929 patients were included, 9.4% (n=275) had CS. Median FMC-to-device time was 113.5 (interquartile range, 93.0-145.0) and 103.0 (interquartile range, 85.0-130.0) minutes for patients with CS and without CS, respectively. More patients with CS had FMC-to-device times above guideline recommendations (76.6% versus 54.1%, P<0.001). Between 60 and 90 minutes, for each 10-minute increase in FMC-to-device time, absolute mortality for patients with CS increased by 4% to 7%, whereas for patients without CS, it increased by <0.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary angiography, reperfusion delays among patients with CS are associated with significantly worse outcomes. Strategies to reduce FMC-to-device times for patients with STEMI presenting with CS are required.

Neuroprognostication in the Post Cardiac Arrest Patient: A Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Statement.

Cardiac arrest (CA) is associated with a low rate of survival with favourable neurologic recovery. The most common mechanism of death after successful resuscitation from CA is withdrawal of life-sustaining measures on the basis of perceived poor neurologic prognosis due to underlying hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Neuroprognostication is an important component of the care pathway for CA patients admitted to hospital but is complex, challenging, and often guided by limited evidence. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to evaluate the evidence underlying factors or diagnostic modalities available to determine prognosis, recommendations were generated in the following domains: (1) circumstances immediately after CA; (2) focused neurologic exam; (3) myoclonus and seizures; (4) serum biomarkers; (5) neuroimaging; (6) neurophysiologic testing; and (7) multimodal neuroprognostication. This position statement aims to serve as a practical guide to enhance in-hospital care of CA patients and emphasizes the adoption of a systematic, multimodal approach to neuroprognostication. It also highlights evidence gaps.

Temporal Trends in Reperfusion Delivery and Clinical Outcomes Following Implementation of a Regional STEMI Protocol: A 12-Year Perspective.

Background: The Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) program aimed to increase access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and reduce first-medical-contact-to-device times (FMC-DTs). We evaluated the long-term program impact on PPCI access and FMC-DT, and overall and reperfusion-specific in-hospital mortality. Methods: We analyzed all VCH STEMI patients between June 2007 and November 2019. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving PPCI over 4 program implementation phases over 12 years. We also evaluated overall changes in median FMC-DT and the proportion of patients achieving guideline-mandated FMC-DT, in addition to overall and reperfusion-specific in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 3138 of 4305 VCH STEMI patients were treated with PPCI. PPCI rates increased from 40.2% to 78.7% from 2007 to 2019 (P < 0.001). From phase 1 to 4, median FMC-DT improved from 118 to 93 minutes (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]-capable hospitals, P < 0.001) and from 174 to 118 minutes (non-PCI-capable hospitals, P < 0.001), with a concomitant increase in those achieving guideline-mandated FMC-DT (35.5% to 66.1%, P < 0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality was 9.0% (P = 0.20 across phases), with mortality differing significantly by reperfusion strategy (4.0% fibrinolysis, 5.7% PPCI, 30.6% no reperfusion therapy, P < 0.001). Mortality significantly decreased from phase 1 to phase 4 at non-PCI-capable centres (9.6% to 3.9%, P = 0.022) but not at PCI-capable centres (8.7% vs 9.9%, P = 0.27). Conclusions: A regional STEMI program increased the proportion of patients who received PPCI and improved reperfusion times over 12 years. Although no statistically significant decrease occurred in overall regional mortality incidence, mortality incidence was decreased for patients presenting to non-PCI-capable centres.

Contexte: Le programme sur l'infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST (STEMI) de la régie régionale de santé Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) visait à améliorer l'accès à des interventions coronariennes percutanées primaires (ICPP) et à réduire le temps entre le premier contact médical et l'intervention. Nous avons évalué les effets à long terme du programme sur l'accès aux ICPP, sur le temps entre le premier contact médical et l'intervention, ainsi que sur le taux global de mortalité hospitalière et le taux de mortalité hospitalière lié à la reperfusion. Méthodologie: Nous avons analysé les cas de tous les patients admis au programme STEMI de la VCH entre juin 2007 et novembre 2019. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la proportion de patients recevant une ICPP pendant les 4 phases du programme, qui se sont étalées sur 12 ans. Nous avons aussi évalué la variation totale du temps médian entre le premier contact médical et l'intervention, et de la proportion de patients chez qui le temps recommandé entre le premier contact médical et l'intervention a été respecté ainsi que la variation du taux global de mortalité hospitalière et du taux de mortalité hospitalière lié à la reperfusion. Résultats: Au total, 3138 des 4305 patients du programme STEMI de la VCH ont été traités par une ICPP. Les taux d'ICPP sont passés de 40,2 % à 78,7 % entre 2007 et 2019 (p < 0,001). De la phase 1 à la phase 4 du programme, le temps médian entre le premier contact médical et l'intervention s'est amélioré, passant de 118 minutes à 93 minutes (hôpitaux en mesure d'effectuer une intervention coronarienne percutanée [ICP]; p < 0,001) et de 174 à 118 minutes (hôpitaux n'étant pas en mesure d'effectuer une ICP; p < 0,001), avec une augmentation du nombre de personnes pour qui le temps recommandé entre le premier contact médical et l'intervention a été respecté (35,5 % à 66,1 %; p < 0,001). Le taux global de mortalité hospitalière était de 9,0 % (p = 0,20 pour toutes les phases), et le taux de mortalité hospitalière lié à la reperfusion différait de manière significative selon la stratégie adoptée (fibrinolyse : 4,0 %; ICPP : 5,7 %; aucune reperfusion : 30,6 %; p < 0,001). Le taux de mortalité a diminué de manière significative entre la phase 1 et la phase 4 dans les centres qui n'étaient pas en mesure d'effectuer une ICP (9,6 % à 3,9 %; p = 0,022), mais pas dans les centres en mesure d'effectuer une ICP (8,7 % c. 9,9 %; p = 0,27). Conclusions: Le programme STEMI régional a permis d'augmenter la proportion de patients qui ont reçu une ICPP et d'améliorer les temps de reperfusion sur 12 ans. Bien qu'aucune diminution statistiquement significative n'ait été observée quant au taux global de mortalité dans la région, le taux de mortalité a diminué chez les patients se présentant dans un centre qui n'était pas en mesure d'effectuer une ICP.

Atrial Fibrillation Occurring During Acute Hospitalization: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Acute atrial fibrillation is defined as atrial fibrillation detected in the setting of acute care or acute illness; atrial fibrillation may be detected or managed for the first time during acute hospitalization for another condition. Atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery is a distinct type of acute atrial fibrillation. Acute atrial fibrillation is associated with high risk of long-term atrial fibrillation recurrence, warranting clinical attention during acute hospitalization and over long-term follow-up. A framework of substrates and triggers can be useful for evaluating and managing acute atrial fibrillation. Acute management requires a multipronged approach with interdisciplinary care collaboration, tailoring treatments to the patient's underlying substrate and acute condition. Key components of acute management include identification and treatment of triggers, selection and implementation of rate/rhythm control, and management of anticoagulation. Acute rate or rhythm control strategy should be individualized with consideration of the patient's capacity to tolerate rapid rates or atrioventricular dyssynchrony, and the patient's ability to tolerate the risk of the therapeutic strategy. Given the high risks of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with acute atrial fibrillation, clinical follow-up and heart rhythm monitoring are warranted. Long-term management is guided by patient substrate, with implications for intensity of heart rhythm monitoring, anticoagulation, and considerations for rhythm management strategies. Overall management of acute atrial fibrillation addresses substrates and triggers. The 3As of acute management are acute triggers, atrial fibrillation rate/rhythm management, and anticoagulation. The 2As and 2Ms of long-term management include monitoring of heart rhythm and modification of lifestyle and risk factors, in addition to considerations for atrial fibrillation rate/rhythm management and anticoagulation. Several gaps in knowledge related to acute atrial fibrillation exist and warrant future research.

Characteristics, therapies, and outcomes of In-Hospital vs Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest in patients presenting to cardiac intensive care units: From the critical care Cardiology trials network (CCCTN).

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest (CA) is a common reason for admission to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU), though the relative burden of morbidity, mortality, and resource use between admissions with in-hospital (IH) and out-of-hospital (OH) CA is unknown. We compared characteristics, care patterns, and outcomes of admissions to contemporary CICUs after IHCA or OHCA. METHODS: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter network of tertiary CICUs in the US and Canada. Participating centers contributed data from consecutive admissions during 2-month annual snapshots from 2017 to 2021. We analyzed characteristics and outcomes of admissions by IHCA vs OHCA. RESULTS: We analyzed 2,075 admissions across 29 centers (50.3% IHCA, 49.7% OHCA). Admissions with IHCA were older (median 66 vs 62 years), more commonly had coronary disease (38.3% vs 29.7%), atrial fibrillation (26.7% vs 15.6%), and heart failure (36.3% vs 22.1%), and were less commonly comatose on CICU arrival (34.2% vs 71.7%), p < 0.001 for all. IHCA admissions had lower lactate (median 4.3 vs 5.9) but greater utilization of invasive hemodynamics (34.3% vs 23.6%), mechanical circulatory support (28.4% vs 16.8%), and renal replacement therapy (15.5% vs 9.4%); p < 0.001 for all. Comatose IHCA patients underwent targeted temperature management less frequently than OHCA patients (63.3% vs 84.9%, p < 0.001). IHCA admissions had lower unadjusted CICU (30.8% vs 39.0%, p < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (36.1% vs 44.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite a greater burden of comorbidities, CICU admissions after IHCA have lower lactate, greater invasive therapy utilization, and lower crude mortality than admissions after OHCA.

Incidence and Predictors of Adverse Events Among Initially Stable ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background Cardiac intensive care units were originally created in the prerevascularization era for the early recognition of ventricular arrhythmias following a myocardial infarction. Many patients with stable ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are still routinely triaged to cardiac intensive care units after a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), independent of clinical risk or the provision of critical care therapies. The aim of this study was to determine factors associated with in-hospital adverse events in a hemodynamically stable, postreperfusion population of patients with STEMI. Methods and Results Between April 2012 and November 2019, 2101 consecutive patients with STEMI who received pPCI in the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority were evaluated. Patients were stratified into those with and without subsequent adverse events, which were defined as cardiogenic shock, in-hospital cardiac arrest, stroke, re-infarction, and death. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of adverse events. After excluding patients presenting with cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, or heart failure, the final analysis cohort comprised 1770 stable patients with STEMI who had received pPCI. A total of 94 (5.3%) patients developed at least one adverse event: cardiogenic shock 55 (3.1%), in-hospital cardiac arrest 42 (2.4%), death 28 (1.6%), stroke 21 (1.2%), and re-infarction 5 (0.3%). Univariable predictors of adverse events were older age, female sex, prior stroke, chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation. There was no significant difference in reperfusion times between those with and without adverse events. Following multivariable adjustment, moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <44 mL/min; 13% of cohort) was associated with adverse events (odds ratio 2.24 [95% CI, 1.12-4.48]) independent of reperfusion time, age, sex, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, and prior myocardial infarction/PCI/coronary artery bypass grafting. Conclusions Only 1 in 20 initially stable patients with STEMI receiving pPCI developed an in-hospital adverse event. Moderate to severe chronic kidney disease independently predicted the risk of future adverse events. These results indicate that the majority of patients with STEMI who receive pPCI may not require routine admission to a cardiac intensive care unit following reperfusion.

Long-term Mortality, Readmission, and Resource Utilization Among Hospital Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), the influence of pre- and in-hospital factors on long-term survival, readmission, and resource utilization is ill-defined, mainly related to challenges combining disparate data sources. METHODS: Adult nontraumatic OHCA from the British Columbia Cardiac Arrest Registry (January 2009 to December 2016) were linked to provincial datasets comprising comorbidities, medications, cardiac procedures, mortality, and hospital admission and discharge. Among hospital-discharge survivors, the 3-year end point of mortality or mortality and all-cause readmission was examined with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression model for predictors. The use of publicly funded home care and community services within 1 year after discharge also was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 10,674 linked, emergency medical services-treated adult OHCAs, 3230 were admitted to hospital and 1325 survived to hospital discharge. At 3 years after discharge, the estimated Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 84.1% (95% CI 81.7%-86.1%) and freedom from death or all-cause readmission was 31.8% (29.0%-34.7%). After exclusions, 26.6% (n = 315/1186) accessed residential or home care services within 1 year. Independent predictors of long-term outcomes included age and comorbidities, but also favourable arrest characteristics and in-hospital factors such as revascularization or receipt of an intracardiac defibrillator before discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Among OHCA hospital survivors, the long-term death or readmission risk persists and is modulated by both pre- and in-hospital factors. However, only 1 in 4 survivors required residential or home care after discharge. These results support efforts to improve care processes to increase survival to hospital discharge.

Escalating and De-escalating Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock has increased dramatically despite a lack of randomized controlled trials or evidence guiding clinical decision-making. Recommendations from professional societies on temporary mechanical circulatory support escalation and de-escalation are limited. This scientific statement provides pragmatic suggestions on temporary mechanical circulatory support device selection, escalation, and weaning strategies in patients with common cardiogenic shock causes such as acute decompensated heart failure and acute myocardial infarction. The goal of this scientific statement is to serve as a resource for clinicians making temporary mechanical circulatory support management decisions and to propose standardized approaches for their use until more robust randomized clinical data are available.

Association of pre-hospital time intervals and clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.

Study Objectives: Timely coronary reperfusion is critical for favorable outcomes after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A substantial proportion of the total ischemic time is patient related, occurring before first medical contact (FMC). We aimed to expand the limited current understanding of the associations between prehospital intervals and clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) (January 2009-March 2016) and assessed the associations between prehospital intervals and the incidence of new heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and hospital length of stay (LOS), adjusting for important clinical variables. Results: A total of 773 patients (77% men, median age 65 years) met eligibility criteria. The median pre-911 activation interval was 29 minutes (interquartile range: 11, 89); the median 911 call to FMC interval was 12 minutes (interquartile range: 9, 15). In multivariable analysis, there was a V-shaped relationship between the pre-911 activation interval and outcomes: a lower likelihood of new heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30, 0.87), cardiogenic shock (OR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.75) and prolonged LOS (OR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.42) for midrange intervals (11-88 minutes) when compared to the early (< 11-minute) interval. There was no statistically significant relationship between total pre-FMC time and FMC to device activation time. Conclusions: Among ambulance-transported STEMI patients receiving pPCI, the shortest and longest pre-911 activation time intervals were associated with poorer outcomes. However, variation in post-FMC interval alone was not associated with outcomes, suggesting that interventions to reduce pre-FMC intervals must be prioritized.

Care and Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Across Multiple COVID-19 Waves.

BACKGROUND: There are concerns of delays in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear whether the care and outcomes of STEMI patients differ between COVID-19 waves and compared with historical periods. METHODS: Consecutive patients in the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority STEMI database were included to compare care during 3 distinct waves of the COVID-19 pandemic (9 months; March 2020 to January 2021) with an historical non-COVID-19 cohort. We compared STEMI incidence, baseline characteristics, and outcomes between groups. We also examined time from first medical contact (FMC) to reperfusion, symptom to FMC, and FMC to STEMI diagnosis, as well as predictors of delays. RESULTS: The incidence of STEMI was similar during COVID-19 (n = 305; mean 0.93/day) and before COVID-19 (n = 949; 0.97/day; P = 0.80). The COVID-19 cohort showed significant delay in FMC-to-reperfusion (median 116 min vs 102 min; P < 0.001) and FMC-to-STEMI diagnosis (median 17 mins vs 11 min; P < 0.001). Delays in FMC-to-device times worsened across the 3 COVID-19 waves (FMC-to-device time ≤ 90 min in wave 1: 32.9%; in wave 2: 25.6%; in wave 3: 16.3%; P = 0.045 [47.5% before COVID-19; P < 0.001]). There were no significant predictors of delay were unique to the COVID-19 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates delays in reperfusion during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the historical control, with delays increasing during subsequent waves within the pandemic. It is critical to further understand these care gaps to improve STEMI care for future waves of the current and future pandemics.

Development of Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality and Readmission Models for Public Reporting on Hospital Performance in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Given changes in the care and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients over the past several decades, we sought to develop prediction models that could be used to generate accurate risk-adjusted mortality and readmission outcomes for hospitals in current practice across Canada. METHODS: A Canadian national expert panel was convened to define appropriate AMI patients for reporting and develop prediction models. Preliminary candidate variable evaluation was conducted using Ontario patients hospitalized with a most responsible diagnosis of AMI from April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2018. National data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information was used to develop AMI prediction models. The main outcomes were 30-day all-cause in-hospital mortality and 30-day urgent all-cause readmission. Discrimination of these models (measured by c-statistics) was compared with that of existing Canadian Institute for Health Information models in the same study cohort. RESULTS: The AMI mortality model was assessed in 54,240 Ontario AMI patients and 153,523 AMI patients across Canada. We observed a 30-day in-hospital mortality rate of 6.3%, and a 30-day all-cause urgent readmission rate of 10.7% in Canada. The final Canadian AMI mortality model included 12 variables and had a c-statistic of 0.834. For readmission, the model had 13 variables and a c-statistic of 0.679. Discrimination of the new AMI models had higher c-statistics compared with existing models (c-statistic 0.814 for mortality; 0.673 for readmission). CONCLUSIONS: In this national collaboration, we developed mortality and readmission models that are suitable for profiling performance of hospitals treating AMI patients in Canada.

CONTEXTE: Compte tenu des changements apportés au cours des dernières décennies aux soins des patients ayant subi un infarctus aigu du myocarde (IAM) et aux issues d'un tel événement, nous avons voulu élaborer des modèles prédictifs pouvant servir à calculer de façon précise les résultats relatifs à la mortalité et aux réadmissions, ajustés selon les risques, pour les hôpitaux dans la pratique actuelle au Canada. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Un groupe national d'experts canadiens a été mis sur pied et a reçu le mandat de définir les critères appropriés applicables aux patients ayant subi un IAM aux fins de déclaration des cas et d'élaborer des modèles prédictifs. L'évaluation préliminaire des variables proposées a été effectuée à partir de patients hospitalisés en Ontario entre le 1er avril 2015 et le 31 mars 2018 chez lesquels l'IAM était le diagnostic principal à l'origine de l'hospitalisation. Les données à l'échelle nationale de l'Institut canadien d'information sur la santé (ICIS) ont été utilisées pour élaborer des modèles prédictifs d'IAM. Les deux principales issues évaluées étaient la mortalité hospitalière toutes causes confondues à 30 jours et la réadmission urgente toutes causes confondues à 30 jours. Le pouvoir discriminant de ces modèles (mesuré par la statistique C) a été comparé à celui des modèles existants de l'ICIS dans la même cohorte de l'étude. RÉSULTATS: Le modèle de mortalité par IAM a été évalué auprès de patients ayant subi un IAM, dont 54 240 en Ontario et 153 523 dans l'ensemble du Canada. Nous avons observé un taux de mortalité hospitalière à 30 jours de 6,3 % et un taux de réadmission urgente à 30 jours toutes causes confondues de 10,7 % au Canada. Le modèle canadien final de prédiction de la mortalité par IAM était constitué de 12 variables et avait une statistique C de 0,834. Pour la réadmission, le modèle comportait 13 variables et présentait une statistique C de 0,679. Le pouvoir discriminant des nouveaux modèles d'IAM présentait une statistique C supérieure à celle des modèles existants (statistique C de 0,814 pour la mortalité et de 0,673 pour la réadmission). CONCLUSIONS: Dans le cadre de cette collaboration nationale, nous avons élaboré des modèles prédictifs de la mortalité et de la réadmission hospitalière qui permettent d'établir un profil des résultats obtenus par les hôpitaux traitant des patients ayant subi un IAM au Canada.

Colchicine for Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Review and Practical Approach for Clinicians.

A better understanding of the central role of inflammation in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been the impetus for the evaluation of therapeutic strategies targeting the interleukin-1ß/interleukin-6 cytokine signaling pathway, involved in both chronic atherogenesis and in triggering of atherosclerotic plaque rupture. As an inexpensive pharmacologic agent with relatively few adverse effects that tend to be mild and tolerable, the role of colchicine in secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events has been the focus of multiple recent large-scale randomized controlled trials involving patients with stable CAD (Low-Dose Colchicine [LoDoCo] and LoDoCo2 trials), a recent myocardial infarction (Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcome Trial [COLCOT], Colchicine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [COPS], and Colchicine and Spironolactone in Patients With Myocardial Infarction/Synergy Stent Registry [CLEAR SYNERGY] trials), and undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (Colchicine in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [COLCHICINE-PCI] trial). Based on this evidence, low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) should be considered in patients with recent myocardial infarctions-within 30 days and, ideally, within 3 days-or with stable CAD to improve cardiovascular outcomes. Colchicine should not be used in patients with severe renal or hepatic disease because of the risk of severe toxicity. No serious adverse effect was associated with the combined use of colchicine and high-intensity statin therapy in large trials. The impact of colchicine in high-risk populations of patients with peripheral arterial disease and in those with diabetes for the primary prevention of CAD remains to be established.

Access-Site vs Non-Access-Site Major Bleeding and In-Hospital Outcomes Among STEMI Patients Receiving Primary PCI.

BACKGROUND: Major bleeding (MB) is an independent predictor of mortality among ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Prevention of access-site MB has received significant attention. However, limited data have been obtained on the influence of access-site MB vs non-access-site MB and association with subsequent adverse in-hospital outcomes in the STEMI population undergoing pPCI. METHODS: We identified 1494 STEMI patients who underwent pPCI between 2012 and 2018. Unadjusted and adjusted differences among patients with no MB, access-site MB, non-access-site MB, and in-hospital clinical outcomes were assessed. The use of bleeding-avoidance strategies and their effects on MB were also evaluated. RESULTS: MB occurred in 121 (8.1%) patients. Access-site MB occurred in 34 (2.3%) patients, and non-access-site MB occurred in 87 (5.8%). The median reduction in hemoglobin was 31 g/L (interquartile range: 19-43) with access-site MB, and 44 g/L (interquartile range: 29-62) with non-access-site MB. After multivariable adjustment, non-access-site MB was independently associated with in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04-8.68), cardiogenic shock (aOR 10.91; 95% CI 5.67-20.98), and cardiac arrest (aOR 5.63; 95% CI 2.88-11.01). Conversely, access-site MB was not associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes. Bleeding-avoidance strategies were used frequently; however, after multivariable adjustment, no single bleeding-avoidance strategy was significantly associated with reduced MB. CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients undergoing pPCI, non-access-site MB was independently associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes, whereas access-site MB was not. Additional study of strategies to reduce the incidence and impact of non-access-site MB appears to be warranted.

CONTEXTE: Le saignement majeur (SM) est un facteur prédictif indépendant de la mortalité chez les patients ayant eu un infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST (STEMI) qui subissent une intervention coronarienne percutanée primaire (ICPp). La prévention du SM lié à l'accès vasculaire a fait l'objet de nombreuses études. Toutefois, rares sont les données sur l'influence du SM lié à l'accès vasculaire par rapport au SM non lié à cet élément et sur son association avec des résultats indésirables intrahospitaliers subséquents chez des patients ayant subi une ICPp après un STEMI. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons répertorié 1 494 patients ayant subi une ICPp après un STEMI entre 2012 et 2018. Nous avons évalué les différences non ajustées et ajustées entre les cas sans SM, les cas de SM liés à l'accès vasculaire et les cas de SM non liés à l'accès vasculaire, et les résultats cliniques intrahospitaliers. L'utilisation de stratégies d'évitement des saignements et leurs effets sur le SM ont également été évalués. RÉSULTATS: Un SM a été observé chez 121 (8,1 %) patients. Le SM lié à l'accès vasculaire touchait 34 (2,3 %) patients, et le SM non lié à l'accès vasculaire 87 (5,8 %) patients. La réduction médiane du taux d'hémoglobine était de 31 g/L (intervalle interquartile : 19 à 43) dans le cas du SM lié à l'accès vasculaire, et de 44 g/L (intervalle interquartile : 29 à 62) pour le SM non lié à l'accès vasculaire. Après ajustement multivarié, une association indépendante a été observée entre le SM non lié à l'accès vasculaire et le décès (rapport de cotes ajusté [RRa] 4,21; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : de 2,04 à 8,68), le choc cardiogénique (RRa 10,91; IC à 95 % : de 5,67 à 20,98), et l'arrêt cardiaque (RRa 5,63; IC à 95 % : de 2,88 à 11,01) intrahospitaliers. Inversement, le SM lié à l'accès vasculaire n'était associé à aucun résultat indésirable intrahospitalier. Les stratégies d'évitement des saignements avaient été utilisées fréquemment; toutefois, après ajustement multivarié, aucune stratégie particulière d'évitement des saignements n'était associée de façon significative à une réduction du SM. CONCLUSIONS: Chez les patients subissant une ICPp après un STEMI, le SM non lié à l'accès vasculaire était associé de façon indépendante aux résultats indésirables intrahospitaliers, alors que le SM lié à l'accès vasculaire ne l'était pas. La poursuite des recherches sur les stratégies permettant de réduire l'incidence et les conséquences du SM non lié à l'accès vasculaire semble donc justifiée.

Predictors of the Use of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction Post-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background Guidelines recommend mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% following a myocardial infarction plus heart failure or diabetes mellitus, based on mortality benefit in the EPHESUS (Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study) trial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world utilization of MRAs for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with left ventricular dysfunction. Methods and Results The prospective, population-based, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority STEMI database was linked with local outpatient cardiology records from 2007 to 2018. EPHESUS criteria were used to define post-STEMI MRA eligibility (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% plus clinical heart failure or diabetes mellitus, and no dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction). The primary outcome was MRA prescription among eligible patients at discharge and the secondary outcome was MRA prescription within 3 months postdischarge. Of 2691 patients with STEMI, 317 (12%) were MRA eligible, and 70 (22%) eligible patients were prescribed an MRA at discharge. Among eligible patients with no MRA at discharge, 12/126 (9.5%) with documented postdischarge follow-up were prescribed an MRA within 3 months. In multivariable analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR], 1.55 per 5% left ventricular ejection fraction decrease; 95% CI, 1.26-1.90) and calendar year (OR, 1.23 per year, 95% CI, 1.11-1.37) were associated with MRA prescription at discharge. Other prespecified variables were not associated with MRA prescription. Conclusions In this contemporary STEMI cohort, only 1 in 4 MRA-eligible patients were prescribed an MRA within 3 months following hospitalization despite high-quality evidence for use. Novel decision-support tools are required to optimize pharmacotherapy decisions during hospitalization and follow-up to target this gap in post-STEMI care.