Establishing obstetrics-specific metrics and interventions for antimicrobial stewardship.

Background: To describe baseline antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) metrics and apply AMS interventions in an inpatient obstetrical population. Methods: From October 2018 to October 2019, our tertiary-care obstetrical center reviewed components of our AMS program, which included: (1) antimicrobial consumption data, (2) point prevalence surveys (PPS), and (3) prospective audit and feedback. We reviewed institutional data for antimicrobial consumption from the pharmacy database. Detailed point prevalence surveys were conducted for all antimicrobial prescriptions on two predefined dates each month. Daily audits and feedback assessed the appropriateness of all non-protocolized antimicrobials. Results: Our average antimicrobial length of therapy (LOT) was 12 days per 100 patient-days, where erythromycin (2.33), amoxicillin (2.28), and ampicillin (1.81) were the greatest contributors. Point prevalence surveys revealed that 28.8% of obstetrical inpatients were on antimicrobials, of which 11.2% were inappropriate. Protocolized antimicrobials were 62% less likely (p = 0.027) to be inappropriate. From 565 audited prescriptions, 110 (19.5%) resulted in feedback, where 90% of recommendations were accepted and implemented. The most common reasons for interventions include incorrect dosage, recommending a diagnostic test before continuing antimicrobials, and changing antimicrobials based on specific culture and sensitivity. Conclusions: Antimicrobial use in obstetrics is unique compared to general inpatients. We provide a baseline set of metrics for AMS at our obstetrical center intending to lay the groundwork for AMS programming in our discipline. Antimicrobial protocolization, as well as audit and feedback, are feasible interventions to improve antimicrobial prescribing patterns.

Historique: Décrire les mesures de gouvernance antimicrobienne (GAM) fondamentales et utiliser les interventions de GAM dans une population obstétricale hospitalisée. Méthodologie: D'octobre 2018 à octobre 2019, le centre obstétrical de soins tertiaires a révisé les éléments du programme de GAM, qui incluait : 1) les données sur la consommation d'antimicrobiens, 2) les enquêtes de prévalence ponctuelles (EPP) et 3) la vérification et la rétroaction prospectives. Les chercheurs ont examiné les données institutionnelles relatives à la consommation d'antimicrobiens dans la base de données de la pharmacie. Ils ont effectué des enquêtes de prévalence ponctuelles détaillées sur toutes les prescriptions d'antimicrobiens à deux dates déterminées chaque mois. Les vérifications et les rétroactions quotidiennes ont permis d'évaluer la pertinence de tous les antimicrobiens non protocolisés. Résultats: La durée du traitement antimicrobien moyen était de 12 jours sur 100 jours-patients, et l'érythromycine (2,33), l'amoxicilline (2,28) et l'ampicilline (1,81) étaient les plus utilisées. Les enquêtes de prévalence ponctuelles ont révélé que 28,8 % des patientes obstétricales hospitalisées prenaient des antimicrobiens, dont 11,2 % étaient inappropriés. Les antimicrobiens protocolisés étaient 62 % moins susceptibles d'être inappropriés (p = 0,027). Des 565 prescriptions vérifiées, 110 (19,5 %) ont donné lieu à des rétroactions, et 90 % des recommandations ont été acceptées et mises en œuvre. Les principales raisons d'intervenir incluaient une posologie inexacte, la recommandation d'un test diagnostique avant de poursuivre l'antimicrobien, ainsi que le changement d'antimicrobien d'après la culture et sensibilité spécifiques. Conclusions: L'utilisation d'antimicrobiens est unique en obstétrique par rapport aux autres patients hospitalisés. Les chercheurs fournissent la série de mesures de GAM de référence utilisée à leur centre obstétrical pour jeter les bases de la programmation de la GAM dans la discipline. La protocolisation des antimicrobiens, de même que la vérification et la rétroaction, est une intervention faisable pour améliorer les profils de prescription d'antimicrobiens.

Risk factors for urinary retention after urogynecologic surgery: A retrospective cohort study and prediction model.

AIMS: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication of urogynecological surgery. Our study aimed to identify demographic and perioperative risk factors to construct a prediction model for POUR in urogynecology. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study reviewed all patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgeries at our tertiary care center (Jan 1, 2013-May 1, 2019). Demographic, pre-, intra- and postoperative variables were collected from medical records. The primary outcome, POUR, was defined as (1) early POUR (E-POUR), failing initial trial of void or; (2) late POUR (L-POUR), requiring an indwelling catheter or intermittent catheterization on discharge. Risk factors were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A clinical prediction model was constructed with the most significant and clinically relevant risk factors. RESULTS: In 501 women, 182 (36.3%) had E-POUR and 61 of these women (12.2% of the entire cohort) had L-POUR. Multivariate logistic regression revealed preoperative postvoid residual (PVR) over 200 ml (odds ratio [OR]: 3.17; p = 0.026), voiding dysfunction symptoms extracted from validated questionnaires (OR: 3.00; p = 0.030), and number of concomitant procedures (OR: 1.30 per procedure; p = 0.021) as significant predictors of E-POUR; preoperative PVR more than 200 ml (OR: 4.07; p = 0.011) and antiincontinence procedure with (OR: 3.34; p = 0.023) and without (OR: 2.64; p = 0.019) concomitant prolapse repair as significant predictors of L-POUR. A prediction model (area under the curve: 0.70) was developed for E-POUR. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated preoperative PVR is the most significant risk factor for POUR. Alongside other risk factors, our prediction model for POUR can be used for patient counseling and surgical planning in urogynecologic surgery.

Diagnosis and Management of an Unusual Cyst 3 Years After Sacrocolpopexy.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal inclusion cysts (PICs) are uncommon tumours that can pose diagnostic challenges. This report describes an unusual etiology and management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse. CASE: A 48-year-old premenopausal woman presented with recurrent prolapse and urinary frequency after total abdominal hysterectomy and synthetic mesh sacrocolpopexy. On examination, a stage II rectoenterocele was noted. Her post-void residual was 760 mL as measured by bladder scanner, discrepant with in-and-out catheterization. Pelvic ultrasound revealed a 19-cm cystic pelvic mass. At laparoscopy a PIC was identified, and cystectomy, uterosacral plication, and Moschcowitz culdoplasty were performed. Complete symptom resolution was documented at 4 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: PICs should be included in the differential diagnosis of recurrent prolapse. Prolapse symptoms attributable to PICs can be treated with laparoscopic cystectomy.

Perceived acceptability of progesterone to prevent preterm births and low birth weight among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected Zambian pregnant women.

INTRODUCTION: Intramuscular and vaginal progesterone are recommended for prevention of preterm labor (PTL) in women with risk factors. Studies are emerging to indicate that HIV-infected women on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) are at risk of PTL and low birth weight (LBW), and may benefit from supplemental progesterone. This study aims to determine the perceived acceptability of various modes of progesterone supplementation to prevent PTL and LBW in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women. METHODS: HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women were recruited in Lusaka, Zambia. The participants completed a questionnaire to assess their willingness to take oral, vaginal, or intramuscular progesterone supplementation for preventing PTL and LBW, preferred modes of supplementation, and concern for PTL and LBW. RESULTS: The study questionnaire was completed by 147 participants. Of the participants, 98.6% would consider using a medication to help prevent PTL and LBW, of whom 97.9% would consider using an oral form of progesterone. In addition, 83.3% and 84.0% of women would consider intramuscular and vaginal (gel or tablet) administration of progesterone respectively. Between intramuscular and vaginal modes of progesterone, 60.5% of participants (n=147) preferred intramuscular progesterone, while 39.5% preferred vaginal progesterone. There was no difference in preference between HIV-infected (n=70) and HIV-uninfected (n=77) women. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Pregnant Zambian women demonstrated a high degree of acceptance for all modes of progesterone supplementation for the prevention of PTL and LBW. Women preferred intramuscular over vaginal supplementation. Progesterone supplementation can be considered a feasible intervention for preventing PTL and LBW in both HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected pregnant Zambian women.