Effects of short-term moderate intensity exercise on the serum metabolome in older adults: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported changes in the serum metabolome associated with impaired myocardial relaxation in an asymptomatic older community cohort. In this prospective parallel-group randomized control pilot trial, we subjected community adults without cardiovascular disease to exercise intervention and evaluated the effects on serum metabolomics. METHODS: Between February 2019 to November 2019, thirty (83% females) middle-aged adults (53 ± 4 years) were randomized with sex stratification to either twelve weeks of moderate-intensity exercise training (Intervention) (n = 15) or Control (n = 15). The Intervention group underwent once-weekly aerobic and strength training sessions for 60 min each in a dedicated cardiac exercise laboratory for twelve weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03617653). Serial measurements were taken pre- and post-intervention, including serum sampling for metabolomic analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-nine adults completed the study (Intervention n = 14; Control n = 15). Long-chain acylcarnitine C20:2-OH/C18:2-DC was reduced in the Intervention group by a magnitude of 0.714 but increased in the Control group by a magnitude of 1.742 (mean difference -1.028 age-adjusted p = 0.004). Among Controls, alanine correlated with left ventricular mass index (r = 0.529, age-adjusted p = 0.018) while aspartate correlated with Lateral e' (r = -764, age-adjusted p = 0.016). C20:3 correlated with E/e' ratio fold-change in the Intervention group (r = -0.653, age-adjusted p = 0.004). Among Controls, C20:2/C18:2 (r = 0.795, age-adjusted p = 0.005) and C20:2-OH/C18:2-DC fold-change (r = 0.742, age-adjusted p = 0.030) correlated with change in E/A ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Corresponding relationships between serum metabolites and cardiac function in response to exercise intervention provided pilot observations. Future investigations into cellular fuel oxidation or central carbon metabolism pathways that jointly impact the heart and related metabolic systems may be critical in preventive trials.

Prior studies have found changes in cellular biological processes in both cardiac aging and heart failure suggesting a common underlying mechanism. I has also been shown that exercise in healthy participants can reverse the signs of early cardiac aging. In this experimental study, we examined the effects of exercise on biological markers and cardiac function among healthy community older adults. After twelve weeks of exercise, there were changes in biological components associated with cardiac function. These findings highlight the potential of exercise as a strategy to target biological alterations in early cardiac aging and potentially prevent it.

Current frailty knowledge, awareness, and practices among physicians following the 2022 European consensus document on Frailty in Cardiology.

Aims: Aging-related cardiovascular disease and frailty burdens are anticipated to rise with global aging. In response to directions from major cardiovascular societies, we investigated frailty knowledge, awareness, and practices among cardiologists as key stakeholders in this emerging paradigm a year after the European Frailty in Cardiology consensus document was published. Methods and results: We launched a prospective multinational web-based survey via social networks to broad cardiology communities representing multiple World Health Organization regions, including Western Pacific and Southeast Asia regions. Overall, 578 respondents [38.2% female; ages 35-49 years (55.2%) and 50-64 years (34.4%)] across subspecialties, including interventionists (43.3%), general cardiologists (30.6%), and heart failure specialists (HFSs) (10.9%), were surveyed. Nearly half had read the consensus document (38.9%). Non-interventionists had better perceived knowledge of frailty assessment instruments (fully or vaguely aware, 57.2% vs. 45%, adj. P = 0.0002), exercise programmes (well aware, 12.9% vs. 6.0%, adj. P = 0.001), and engaged more in multidisciplinary team care (frequently or occasionally, 52.6% vs. 41%, adj. P = 0.002) than interventionists. Heart failure specialists more often addressed pre-procedural frailty (frequently or occasionally, 43.5% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.004) and polypharmacy (frequently or occasionally, 85.5% vs. 71%, adj. P = 0.014) and had consistently better composite knowledge (39.3% vs. 21.6%, adj. P = 0.001) and practice responses (21% vs. 11.1%, adj. P = 0.018) than non-HFSs. Respondents with better knowledge responses also had better frailty practices (40.3% vs. 3.6%, adj. P < 0.001). Conclusion: Distinct response differences suggest that future strategies strengthening frailty principles should address practices peculiar to subspecialties, such as pre-procedural frailty strategies for interventionists and rehabilitation interventions for HFSs.

Adverse cardiovascular and metabolic perturbations among older women: 'fat-craving' hearts.

BACKGROUND: Despite known sex-based differences in cardiovascular aging, differences in aging biology are poorly understood. We hypothesize that circulating metabolites studied cross-sectionally with cardiac aging may be associated with cardiovascular changes that distinguish cardiac aging in women. METHODS: A population-based cohort of community men and women without cardiovascular disease from Singapore underwent detailed clinical and echocardiography examinations. Cross-sectional associations between cardiac functional characteristics and metabolomics profiles were examined. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-seven adults (48.9% women) participated. Women were younger (72 ± 4.4 years vs 73 ± 4.3 years, p = 0.022), had lower diastolic blood pressures (71 ± 11.0 mmHg vs 76 ± 11.2 mmHg, p < 0.0001, and less likely to have diabetes mellitus (18.0% vs 27.6%, p = 0.013) and smoking (3.8% vs 34.5%, p < 0.001). Body mass indices were similar (24 ± 3.8 kg/m2 vs 24 ± 3.4 kg/m2, p = 0.29), but women had smaller waist circumferences (81 ± 10.1 cm vs 85 ± 9.2 cm, p < 0.001). Women had a significantly higher E/e' ratios (10.9 ± 3.4 vs 9.9 ± 3.3, p = 0.007) and mitral A peak (0.86 ± 0.2 m/s vs 0.79 ± 0.2 m/s, p < 0.001) than men. Among women, lower E/e' ratio was associated with higher levels of C16 (OR 1.019, 95%CI 1.002-1.036, p = 0.029), C16:1 (OR 1.06, 95%CI 1.006-1.118, p = 0.028), serine (OR 1.019, 95%CI 1.002-1.036, p = 0.025), and histidine (OR 1.045, 95%CI 1.013-1.078, p = 0.006). Lower mitral A peak was associated with higher levels of histidine (OR 1.039, 95%CI 1.009-1.070, p = 0.011), isoleucine (OR 1.013, 95%CI 1.004-1.021, p = 0.004), and C20 (OR 1.341, 95%CI 1.067-1.684, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Impairments in diastolic functions were more frequent among older women compared to men, despite lower prevalence of vascular risk factors and preserved cardiac structure. Cardiac aging in women correlated with metabolites involved in fatty acid oxidation and tricyclic acid cycle fuelling.

Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy Versus Rotational Atherectomy in an Asian Population: Clinical Outcomes in Real-World Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We compared real-world clinical outcomes of patients receiving intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) versus rotational atherectomy (RA) for heavily calcified coronary lesions. METHODS: Fifty-three patients who received IVL from January 2017 to July 2020 were retrospectively compared to 271 patients who received RA from January 2017 to December 2018. Primary endpoints were in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: IVL patients had a higher prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (56.6% vs 24.4, p<0.001), multivessel disease (96.2% vs 73.3%, p<0.001) and emergency procedures (17.0% vs 2.2%, p<0.001) compared to RA. In-hospital MACE (11.3% vs 5.9%, p=0.152), MI (7.5% vs 3.3%, p=0.152), and mortality (5.7% vs 3.0%, p=0.319) were not statistically significant. 30-day MACE was higher in the IVL cohort vs RA (17.0% vs 7.4%, p=0.035). Propensity score adjusted regression using IVL was also performed on in-hospital MACE (odds ratio [OR], 1.677; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.588-4.779) and 30-day MACE (OR, 1.910; 95% CI, 0.774-4.718). CONCLUSIONS: These findings represent our initial IVL experience in a high-risk, real-world cohort. Although the event rate in the IVL arm was numerically higher compared to RA, the small numbers and retrospective nature of this study preclude definitive conclusions. These clinical outcomes are likely to improve with greater experience and better case selection, allowing IVL to effectively treat complex calcified coronary lesions.

Observation of handover process in an intensive care unit (ICU): barriers and quality improvement strategy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics and barriers in the handover process in a medical intensive care unit. DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive study using a checklist to observe nurses and doctors during handover of patients in and out of the intensive care unit. SETTING: The study was conducted at a 1000-bed tertiary hospital in Singapore. The unit admits all patients under university medicine clusters, except those needing cardiology services. PARTICIPANTS: Handover between 90 pairs (180 participants)-50 nurse-to-nurse (100 nurses) and 40 doctor-to-doctor (80 doctors)--were passively observed in real time during morning and evening shifts over weekdays. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number and types of distractions and their relationship to the time spent during handover, the information included during handover, and the number of working shifts. RESULTS: The results showed that there were 1.26 (± 1.75) distractions per handover. In 45 (50%) handovers, no distraction occurred. The human factor was the most common distracting factor during handovers, whereas short message service and monitor alarms were not identified as distracting factors. The information included least often was 'do not resuscitate' (DNR). Nurses spent significantly longer during handovers than doctors. CONCLUSION: The findings provide information for improving the handover process during the transfer of patients in and out of the intensive care unit. Distractions during handovers are common and are associated with longer durations. Nurses and doctors rarely address DNR status during handover of ICU patients in this study.

Differences in the handover process and perception between nurses and residents in a critical care setting.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify the differences in practices and perceptions of handovers between nurses and residents in the critical care setting, so as to improve the quality of the process. BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients with complex problems are ideal for the study of handovers. However, few handover studies have been conducted in intensive care units. DESIGN: Descriptive study using questionnaires. METHODS: We interviewed all nurses and residents involved in handovers of patients admitted to and discharged from a medical intensive care unit over a period of one month. Interviews were guided by a questionnaire and conducted between 24-48 hours of handovers. RESULTS: Out of 672 eligible participants, 580 (290 nurses and 290 residents) agreed to participate in the study (86·3% response rate). Compared to residents, nurses received more training on handovers, covered issues specific to allied health specialties more frequently during handovers, and reviewed patients earlier after handovers. The perceived importance of the different components of handover varied significantly: donor residents, donor nurses, recipient residents and recipient nurses emphasised the overall management plan, case complexity, management plan over the next 48 hours and past medical history, including allergies, respectively. Satisfaction in the handover was related to pre-handover review of electronic medical records, handover training and clarity level in the management plan following the handover, with only the last factor remaining significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: More nurses than residents received prior training in handovers. Nursing handovers were more inclusive of allied health specialties. The perceived importance of the components of handover varied. Greater clarity in management plans was associated with better satisfaction. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Deficiencies in the handover process (lack of prior training in handovers, not including allied health specialties and not reviewing electronic records before handover) were identified, thus providing opportunities for mutual learning between nurses and residents.