Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(2): e2354947, 2024 Feb 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349657

RESUMO

Importance: Survivors of head and neck cancers (HNC) have increased risk of stroke. A comprehensive report using standardized methods is warranted to characterize the risk and to inform on survivorship strategy. Objective: To determine the stroke risk in subpopulations of survivors of HNC in Singapore. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national, registry-based, cross-sectional study aimed to estimate stroke risk in subgroups of the HNC population between January 2005 and December 2020. Participants were identified from the Singapore Cancer Registry, the Singapore Stroke Registry, and the Registry of Birth and Deaths using relevant International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) codes. HNC subgroups were defined based on patient demographic, disease, and treatment factors. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to September 2023. Exposure: Diagnosis of HNC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke were studied. The age-standardized incidence rate ratio (SIRR) and age-standardized incidence rate difference (SIRD) were reported. The Singapore general population (approximately 4 million) served as the reference group for these estimations. Results: A total of 9803 survivors of HNC (median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 58 [49-68] years; 7166 [73.1%] male) were identified. The most common HNC subsites were nasopharynx (4680 individuals [47.7%]), larynx (1228 individuals [12.5%]), and tongue (1059 individuals [10.8%]). A total of 337 individuals (3.4%) developed stroke over a median (IQR) follow-up of 42.5 (15.0-94.5) months. The overall SIRR was 2.46 (95% CI, 2.21-2.74), and the overall SIRD was 4.11 (95% CI, 3.37-4.85) strokes per 1000 person-years (PY). The cumulative incidence of stroke was 3% at 5 years and 7% at 10 years after HNC diagnosis. The SIRR was highest among individuals diagnosed at younger than 40 years (SIRR, 30.55 [95% CI, 16.24-52.35]). All population subsets defined by age, sex, race and ethnicity, HNC subsites (except tongue), stage, histology, and treatment modalities had increased risk of stroke compared with the general population. The SIRR and SIRD were significantly higher among individuals who had a primary radiation treatment approach (SIRR, 3.01 [95% CI, 2.64-3.43]; SIRD, 5.12 [95% CI, 4.18-6.29] strokes per 1000 PY) compared with a primary surgery approach (SIRR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.31-2.05]; SIRD, 1.84 [95% CI, 0.923.67] strokes per 1000 PY). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of survivors of HNC, elevated stroke risks were observed across different age, subsites, and treatment modalities, underscoring the importance of early screening and intervention.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Austrália , Estudos Transversais , Sobreviventes , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/epidemiologia
2.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 20(10): 1125-1133.e10, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36240841

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence and survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) are increasing. There is an increasing number of long-term survivors, many of whom are elderly and have comorbidities. We conducted a population-based study in Hong Kong to assess the long-term cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence associated with adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy among CRC survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the population-based electronic medical database of Hong Kong, we identified adults who were diagnosed with high-risk stage II-III CRC and treated with radical surgery followed by adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy between 2010 and 2019. We evaluated the cause-specific cumulative incidence of CVD (including ischemic heart disease, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and stroke) using the flexible parametric competing risk modeling framework. The control group without a history of CVD was selected from among a noncancer random sample from primary care clinics in the same geographic area. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,037 treated patients with CRC and 5,078 noncancer controls. The adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio (HR) for CVD in the cancer cohort compared with the control group was 2.11 (95% CI, 1.39-3.20). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year cause-specific cumulative incidences were 2.0%, 4.5%, and 5.4% in the cancer cohort versus 1.2%, 3.0%, and 3.8% in the control group, respectively. Age at cancer diagnosis (HR per 5-year increase, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.24), male sex (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.06-1.86), comorbidity (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.36-2.61 for 1 comorbidity vs none, and HR, 6.61; 95% CI, 4.55-9.60 for ≥2 comorbidities vs none), diabetes (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.04-1.84), hypertension (HR, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.39-4.50), and dyslipidemia/hyperlipidemia (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.68-3.81) were associated with incident CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of CVD among survivors of high-risk stage II-III CRC. Cardiovascular risk monitoring of this group throughout cancer survivorship is advisable.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias Colorretais , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Colorretais/complicações , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Sobreviventes
3.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol ; 36: 83-90, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35909437

RESUMO

Introduction: Adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in gastric cancer inevitably results in an unintentional spleen radiation dose. We aimed to determine the association between the spleen radiation dose and the observed severity of lymphopenia which may affect the clinical outcomes (survival time and infection risk). Methods: Patients who received adjuvant CRT for gastric cancer between January 2015 and December 2020 were analyzed. The splenic dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were reported as mean splenic dose (MSD) and percentage of splenic volume receiving at least × Gray (Gy). Peripheral blood counts were recorded pre- and post-CRT. The development of severe (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, grade ≥ 3) post-CRT lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count [ALC] < 0.5 K/µL) was assessed by multivariable logistic regression using patient and dosimetric factors. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cumulative incidence of infectious events were estimated and analyzed using the Cox model or competing risk analysis. Results: Eighty-four patients with a median follow-up duration of 42 months were analyzed. Pre- and post-CRT median ALC values were 1.8 K/µL (0.9-3.1 K/µL) and 0.9 K/µL (0.0-4.9 K/µL), respectively (P < 0.001). MSD > 40 Gy (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.26; P = 0.041), sex (OR for male to female, 0.25; 95 % CI, 0.09-0.70; P = 0.008), and baseline absolute neutrophil count (OR per 1 unit increase, 1.61; 95 % CI, 1.02-2.58; P = 0.040) were associated with the development of severe post-CRT lymphopenia, which was a risk factor for poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.47; 95 % CI, 1.24-4.92; P = 0.010) and RFS (HR = 2.27; 95 % CI, 1.16-4.46; P = 0.017). The cumulative incidence of infections was higher among severe post-CRT lymphopenia patients (2.53, 95 % CI, 1.03-6.23, P = 0.043). Conclusion: High splenic radiation doses increase the odds of severe post-CRT lymphopenia, an independent predictor of lower OS and higher risks of recurrence and infections in gastric cancer patients receiving adjuvant CRT. Therefore, optimizing the splenic DVH parameters may decrease the risk of severe post-CRT lymphopenia.

4.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 16(11): e1386-e1396, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32955410

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine and compare the incremental clinical benefit (ICB) and costs of induction chemotherapy (IC) when added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), concurrent chemotherapy (CC) when added to radiotherapy (RT), and CC plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) when added to RT for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LA-NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported overall survival benefit with the use of IC, CC, and CC + AC in LA-NPC. We quantified the ICB using the ASCO and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) value frameworks. We calculated the incremental drug costs in US dollars using the lowest average wholesale price reported in the Lexicomp drug database. RESULTS: We identified three RCTs on IC, three RCTs on CC, and four RCTs on CC + AC. The ICB was judged to be grade A based on the ESMO framework. The ASCO Net Health Benefit score ranged from 17.43 to 57.39. The incremental drug costs ranged from $133.46 to $626.14. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean Net Health Benefit scores (39.37 for IC v 37.61 for CC v 33.98 for CC + AC; P = .89) and costs ($383 for IC v $253 for CC v $460 for CC + AC; P = .27) between the three approaches. There was no statistically significant correlation between ICB and costs. CONCLUSION: The magnitudes of ICB and incremental drug costs of adding of IC to CCRT, CC to RT, and CC + AC to RT for LA-NPC are not significantly different.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia de Indução , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Quimiorradioterapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Humanos , Oncologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico
5.
Cancer Commun (Lond) ; 40(9): 395-405, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32745354

RESUMO

Technology has always driven advances in radiotherapy treatment. In this review, we describe the main technological advances in radiotherapy over the past decades for the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and highlight some of the pressing issues and challenges that remain. We aim to identify emerging trends in radiation medicine. These include advances in personalized medicine and advanced imaging modalities, standardization of planning and delineation, assessment of treatment response and adaptive re-planning, impact of particle therapy, and role of artificial intelligence or automation in clinical care. In conclusion, we expect significant improvement in the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy treatment for NPC over the next decade.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Inteligência Artificial , Humanos , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Medicina de Precisão , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/tendências
6.
Radiol Oncol ; 53(4): 473-479, 2019 10 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31652123

RESUMO

Background Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with bulky disease and/or those who fail to achieve complete response benefit from the addition of radiotherapy (RT). We aim to review the outcome, as well as determine the impact of cell-of-origin, on patients undergoing consolidative RT. Patients and methods Patients with DLBCL treated with radical intent consolidative RT were included. Clinical, pathological and treatment characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records. Survival outcomes and factors that predict for disease-free survival (DFS) were analysed. Results Seventy-four patients were included in this analysis. The median follow up was 3 years (0.7-16 years). Fifty-eight percent of patients had stage I-II disease, and 61% received at least 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Cell-of-origin was discernible in 60% of patients, and approximately half were classified as Germinal centre origin. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of this group was excellent at 92% (median survival not reached). The 5-year DFS was 73% (95% CI 57-83%). Seven percent (n = 5) of patients experienced local recurrence at a median time of 6 months. Failure to achieve complete response post RT and/or initial bulky disease are significant predictors of inferior DFS. There was no association between cell-of-origin and DFS or OS. Conclusions The outcome of patients who received radiotherapy as consolidation is excellent. Patients who fail to achieve complete response after radiotherapy had poorer outcomes. Despite using radiotherapy, presence of bulky disease remains a significant predictor of disease recurrence. We did not find any association of poorer outcomes, with regards to cell-of-origin, in the use of consolidative RT.


Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Linhagem da Célula , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/mortalidade , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/radioterapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
7.
Radiother Oncol ; 129(1): 10-17, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29555182

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine if the addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) to concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) can improve survival. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OBS) to compare the effects of addition of IC to CCRT versus (vs) CCRT alone on overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and adverse events (AE) in LA-NPC. We searched MEDLINE for eligible studies comparing IC plus CCRT vs CCRT for LA-NPC from Jan 1996 to May 2017. We selected RCTs and OBS that included patients with non-metastatic, LA-NPC who received IC followed by CCRT or CCRT alone. Three reviewers independently assessed the abstracts for eligibility. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the MERGE criteria. We performed the meta-analysis with random effects model. We used the GRADE approach to appraise the quality of evidence from RCTs. The primary outcome was OS; secondary outcomes included PFS, DMFS and AE. RESULTS: We found six RCTs and five OBS including 2802 patients with low to moderate risk of bias in their methodological quality. There was high quality evidence from the RCTs that IC improved PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.84, P = 0.0003, I2 = 0%) and OS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.98, P = 0.03, I2 = 0%) significantly and was associated with more frequent AE. The estimates of IC effects from RCTs and OBS were similar (PFS HR 0.69 vs 0.71, interaction P (IP) = 0.92; OS HR 0.77 vs 0.58, IP = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: IC delays disease progression and improves survival significantly for LA-NPC treated with CCRT, and was associated with more toxicity. There were no divergent results between RCTs and OBS. IC followed by CCRT can be considered one of the standard treatment options for LA-NPC.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/terapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Adulto , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/etiologia , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
8.
Head Neck ; 40(3): 622-631, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29130584

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical review was to summate the published data for the long-term outcomes of reirradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: We searched biomedical literature databases for eligible studies published from January 2005 to September 2016. Outcomes of interests were 5-year local failure-free survival, distant failure-free survival, overall survival (OS), and toxicities. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. RESULTS: We found 4 comparative and 8 noncomparative studies (n = 1768). Reirradiation was associated with pooled event rates of 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] 66%-78%; I2 = 84%), 85% (95% CI 82%-88%; I2 = 69%), and 41% (95% CI 36%-47%; I2 = 80%) for 5-year local failure-free survival, distant failure-free survival, and OS, respectively, with significant heterogeneity among the study results. The pooled event rate for grade 5 toxicities was 33% (95% CI 30%-35%; I2 = 0%) with minimal heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Reirradiation with IMRT for locally recurrent NPC could confer long-term disease control and survival but is associated with significant mortality.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Reirradiação/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/mortalidade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Reirradiação/efeitos adversos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 143(12): 2563-2570, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28849413

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is known to have poor survival outcomes. Clinical and biochemical parameters may impact survival outcomes among patients with metastatic NPC and may be used for prognostication. METHODS: One-hundred and fifty-eight patients with metastatic NPC treated at a single tertiary institution were analyzed retrospectively. Multivariate analysis was carried out on patients who were given disease control treatment (n = 135). A numerical score derived from the regression coefficients of each identified independent variable was used to create prognostic groups (PG). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Independent negative prognostic factors included ECOG status >1, LDH level >580 U/L, hemoglobin level <12.0 g/dL and having more than one metastatic organ involvement. Three PGs were obtained: low risk (total score = 0), intermediate risk (1-2) and high risk (3-4). Median survivals of the 3 groups (low, intermediate and high risk) were 57.1, 18.1 and 8.0 months for the three different risk groups, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Risk stratification of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer is possible using a prognostic scoring system based on clinical and biochemical parameters. Patients with low-risk score may achieve good metastatic survival and may benefit from additional therapy for disease control.


Assuntos
Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Metástase Neoplásica , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 93(22): e118, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25396330

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of patients with symptomatic locally advanced/recurrent gastric cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) using modern 3-dimensional conformal techniques.We retrospectively reviewed patients who had palliative RT for index symptoms of gastric bleeding, pain, and obstruction. Study endpoints included symptom response, median survival, and treatment toxicity.Of 115 patients with median age of 77 years, 78 (67.8%) patients had metastatic disease at the time of treatment. Index symptoms were gastric bleeding, pain, and obstruction in 89.6%, 9.2%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively. Dose fractionation regimen ranged from 8-Gy single fraction to 40 Gy in 16 fractions. One hundred eleven patients (93.3%) were computed tomography (CT) planned. Median follow-up was 85 days. Response rates for bleeding, pain, and obstruction were 80.6% (83/103), 45.5% (5/11), and 52.9% (9/17), respectively, and median duration of response was 99 days, 233 days, and 97 days, respectively. Median survival was 85 days. Actuarial 12-month survival was 15.3%. There was no difference in response rates between low (≤39 Gy) and high (>39 Gy) biologically effective dose (BED) regimens (α/ß ratio = 10). Median survival was significantly longer in patients who responded to RT compared with patients who did not (113.5 vs 47 days, P < 0.001). Three patients (2.6%) had grade 3 Common Toxicity Criteria equivalent toxicity (nausea/vomiting/anorexia).External beam RT delivered using 3-dimensional conformal techniques is highly effective and well tolerated in the local palliation of gastric cancer, with palliation lasting the majority of patient's lives. Short (≤39 Gy BED) RT schedules are adequate for effective symptom palliation. A phase II study of palliative gastric RT is ongoing.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Radioterapia Conformacional , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Radiat Oncol ; 8: 268, 2013 Nov 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24229418

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aims to ascertain the significance of early lung toxicity with 3-Dimensional (3D) conformal irradiation for breast carcinomas and identify the sub-groups of patients with increased risk. METHODS: Electronic databases, reference sections of major oncological textbooks and identified studies were searched for synonyms of breast radiotherapy and radiation pneumonitis (RP). Major studies in thoracic irradiation were reviewed to identify factors frequently associated with RP. Meta-analysis for RP incidence estimation and odds ratio calculation were carried out. RESULTS: The overall incidence of Clinical and Radiological RP is 14% and 42% respectively. Ten studies were identified. Dose-volume Histogram (DVH) related dosimetric factors (Volume of lung receiving certain dose, Vdose and Mean lung Dose, MLD), supraclavicular fossa (SCF) irradiation and age are significantly associated with RP, but not sequential chemotherapy and concomitant use of Tamoxifen. A poorly powered study in IMN group contributed to the negative finding. Smoking has a trend towards protective effect against RP. CONCLUSION: Use of other modalities may be considered when Ipsilateral lung V20Gy > 30% or MLD > 15 Gy. Extra caution is needed in SCF and IMN irradiation as they are likely to influence these dosimetric parameters.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Pneumonite por Radiação/epidemiologia , Radioterapia Conformacional/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Prognóstico , Pneumonite por Radiação/etiologia
12.
Support Care Cancer ; 21(7): 2041-8, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23440546

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study explored international radiation oncology trainee decision making in the management of radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV). METHODS: Radiation oncology trainees who were members of the national radiation oncology associations of the USA, Canada, Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, France, Spain and Singapore completed a Web-based survey. Respondents estimated the risks of nausea and vomiting associated with six standardised radiotherapy-only clinical case vignettes modelled after international anti-emetic guidelines and then committed to prophylactic, rescue or no therapy as an initial management approach for each case. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-six trainees from 11 countries responded. Only 28 % were aware of any anti-emetic guideline. In general, risk estimates and management approaches for the high-risk and minimal risk cases varied less and were more in line with guideline standards than were estimates and approaches for the moderate- and low-risk cases. Prophylactic therapy was the most common approach for the high-risk and a moderate-risk case (83 and 71 % of respondents respectively), while rescue therapy was the most common approach for a second moderate-risk case (69 %), two low-risk cases (69 and 76 %) and a minimal risk case (68 %). A serotonin receptor antagonist was the most commonly recommended prophylactic agent. On multivariate analysis, a higher estimated risk of nausea predicted for recommending prophylactic therapy, and a lower estimated risk of nausea predicted for recommending rescue therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation oncology trainee risk estimates and recommended management approaches for RINV clinical case vignettes varied and matched guideline standards more often for high-risk and minimal risk cases than for moderate- and low-risk cases. Risk estimates of nausea specifically were strong predictors of management decisions.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Náusea/etiologia , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/educação , Medição de Risco/normas , Vômito/etiologia , Antieméticos/efeitos adversos , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Náusea/tratamento farmacológico , Náusea/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Antagonistas da Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas da Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito/prevenção & controle
13.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 84(1): e49-60, 2012 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22704982

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate international patterns of practice in the management of radiation therapy-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Oncologists prescribing radiation therapy in the United States, Canada, The Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Spain, Italy, France, Hong Kong, Singapore, Cyprus, and Israel completed a Web-based survey that was based on 6 radiation therapy-only clinical cases modeled after the minimal-, low-, moderate-, and high-emetic risk levels defined in the antiemetic guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. For each case, respondents estimated the risks of nausea and vomiting separately and committed to an initial management approach. RESULTS: In total, 1022 responses were received. Risk estimates and management decisions for the minimal- and high-risk cases varied little and were in line with guideline standards, whereas those for the low- and moderate-risk cases varied greatly. The most common initial management strategies were as follows: rescue therapy for a minimal-risk case (63% of respondents), 2 low-risk cases (56% and 80%), and 1 moderate-risk case (66%); and prophylactic therapy for a second moderate-risk case (75%) and a high-risk case (95%). The serotonin (5-HT)3 receptor antagonists were the most commonly recommended prophylactic agents. On multivariate analysis, factors predictive of a decision for prophylactic or rescue therapy were risk estimates of nausea and vomiting, awareness of the American Society of Clinical Oncology antiemetic guideline, and European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology membership. CONCLUSIONS: Risk estimates and management strategies for RINV varied, especially for low- and moderate-risk radiation therapy cases. Radiation therapy-induced nausea and vomiting are under-studied treatment sequelae. New observational and translational studies are needed to allow for individual patient risk assessment and to refine antiemetic guideline management recommendations.


Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Náusea/terapia , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Vômito/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/etiologia , Náusea/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Antagonistas do Receptor 5-HT3 de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Vômito/etiologia , Vômito/prevenção & controle
14.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol ; 6(4): 357-63, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21114786

RESUMO

AIM: To describe the prevalence, expectations and factors associated with the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Asian radiotherapy patients. METHODS: Overall 65 consecutive patients in an Asian oncology department were surveyed from December 2004 to January 2005, using a modified and translated instrument capturing information on patients' characteristics, CAM use, treatment refusal and satisfaction. RESULTS: Some basic characteristics were: 86% Chinese; median age 56 years (range: 31-87 years); 57% women; cancer types - breast 42%, lung 20%, nasopharyngeal 11%. All had received prior radiotherapy (54%), chemotherapy (51%) or surgery (45%). The median diagnosis-to-survey time was 7.1 months (range 1-168 months). Fifty-six patients (86%) used CAM for cancer treatment. The two commonest categories were spiritual practices (48%) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) (37%). Significant factors in TCM use were being male (P = 0.007) and having advanced disease (P = 0.045). Overall 60% of patients using herbal treatment and 97% of patients using spiritual practices expected a cure, a longer life, symptomatic relief, improved immunity or a better quality of life. Satisfaction with western treatment correlated positively with satisfaction with CAM (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.4). Forty-six patients (71%) did not discuss their CAM use with their oncologists and 64% obtained advice from their friends or families. Fourteen patients refused previous western treatments (11 feared its side effects (79%), five preferred CAM (36%)). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the prevalence of CAM practices among Asian radiotherapy patients, their high expectations of the outcome and the need for better doctor-patient communication.


Assuntos
Terapias Complementares/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Neoplasias/terapia , Pacientes/psicologia , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Povo Asiático , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Int J Hematol ; 90(3): 388-391, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19707712

RESUMO

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma of vulva is exceedingly rare and it often poses a diagnostic challenge if their existence is not suspected. We report a patient who has primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell (C-ALCL) with an unusual presentation as a vulvar ulcer. She received a brief course of chemotherapy followed by local irradiation and has remained disease-free more than a year from the time of diagnosis. To our knowledge, primary C-ALCL involving the vulva has never been reported. Despite its typical cutaneous manifestation of C-ALCL, the uncommon presenting site of this entity warrants recognition because of its prognostic and therapeutic implication.


Assuntos
Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Pele/patologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/terapia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Neoplasias Vulvares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Vulvares/terapia
16.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 67(2): 385-8, 2007 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17118569

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To review the outcome of palliative radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with symptomatic locally advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with symptomatic locally advanced or recurrent gastric cancer who were managed palliatively with RT at The Cancer Institute, Singapore were retrospectively reviewed. Study end points included symptom response, median survival, and treatment toxicity (retrospectively scored using the Common Toxicity Criteria v3.0 [CTC]). RESULTS: Between November 1999 and December 2004, 33 patients with locally advanced or recurrent gastric cancer were managed with palliative intent using RT alone. Median age was 76 years (range, 38-90 years). Twenty-one (64%) patients had known distant metastatic disease at time of treatment. Key index symptoms were bleeding (24 patients), obstruction (8 patients), and pain (8 patients). The majority of patients received 30 Gy/10 fractions (17 patients). Dose fractionation regimen ranged from an 8-Gy single fraction to 40 Gy in 16 fractions. Median survival was 145 days, actuarial 12-month survival 8%. A total of 54.3% of patients (13/24) with bleeding responded (median duration of response of 140 days), 25% of patients (2/8) with obstruction responded (median duration of response of 102 days), and 25% of patients (2/8) with pain responded (median duration of response of 105 days). No obvious dose-response was evident. One Grade 3 CTC equivalent toxicity was recorded. CONCLUSION: External beam RT alone is an effective and well tolerated modality in the local palliation of gastric cancer, with palliation lasting the majority of patients' lives.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/radioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Dor/radioterapia , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Qual Life Res ; 13(7): 1217-23, 2004 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15473500

RESUMO

Methodological studies and outcome research often include several health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurement scales in one questionnaire. Psychological studies have previously demonstrated that changing the sequential order of measurement scales within a questionnaire can alter the pattern of responses. Little is known, however, about whether there are order effects on the assessment of HRQoL in cancer patients. Here we address this issue in a study of 190 Singaporean cancer patients who were assessed using two different HRQoL instruments placed in alternating sequence within a questionnaire package. Measurement properties of the instruments, including the number of missing values, means, variability, known-group validity and internal consistency, were compared in the two samples representing different presentation orders. The HRQoL instruments administered in different sequential orders appeared to be equivalent in several aspects. No major effect of presentation order on outcomes was shown. The reasons and implications of the absence of an order effect are discussed. We conclude that presentation order is unlikely to alter the responses to the two HRQoL instruments.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Análise de Variância , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...