Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 22(8): 1150-61, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18078884

RESUMO

This study investigated the errors of obtaining visually selected anatomic landmarks for use in the registration process in a passive optical non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty system in 5 fresh frozen cadavers. The projected maximum errors in the femoral mechanical axis (due to registration errors of the center of the distal femur) were 0.7 degrees in the coronal and 1.4 degrees in the sagittal plane. The projected maximum errors in the tibial mechanical axis arising from registration errors of the center of the proximal tibia were 1.3 degrees in the coronal and 2 degrees in the sagittal plane. The projected maximum errors in the transepicondylar axis were 9.1 degrees (registration errors of the medial femoral epicondyle) and 7.2 degrees (registration errors of the lateral femoral epicondyle). It should be noted that the results may be partly related to the use of the particular system in this experiment.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Cadáver , Humanos , Modelos Anatômicos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Tíbia/anatomia & histologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 31(3): 142-8, 2003 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12818598

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Stability in distractor design ensures distraction osteogenesis healing with good bone regenerate formation. The aim of this study was to compare the holding strengths of different fixation systems for maxillary distractor design on bone pieces of different thicknesses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional images of 10 dry skulls were obtained by computer tomography and the bone thickness of the maxillae were measured according to five individual anatomical regions (paranasal, infra-orbital, posterior sinus wall, zygomatic and alveolar regions). According to the measurements, the screws of 1.5 and 2mm in diameter and the three-screw mini-plates in triangular and straight configurations were evaluated for holding strength by pull-out tests on fresh animal bone pieces of defined thickness. RESULTS: The paranasal and zygomatic regions of the human skulls had the thickest cortical bone (4mm) followed by the alveolar region (2mm). In the bones of 2 and 4mm thickness, the 2mm screws were confirmed stronger than the 1.5mm ones in pull-out tests. However, the pull-out behaviour of screws of different diameters in 1mm thick bones and the mini-plates in two different configurations showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the paranasal and zygomatic bones are the thickest for fixation of internal maxillary distractors. Fixation screws of 2mm diameter in either triangular or straight miniplates can produce good stabilization for distractors.


Assuntos
Análise do Estresse Dentário , Maxila/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais/instrumentação , Osteogênese por Distração/instrumentação , Análise de Variância , Densidade Óssea , Placas Ósseas , Parafusos Ósseos , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Fixadores Internos , Maxila/fisiopatologia , Seios Paranasais/anatomia & histologia , Zigoma/anatomia & histologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA