Increased tissue expression of IL-31 in patients with psoriasis.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease, and its pathogenesis remains unclear. Although many studies have demonstrated the role of serum interleukin-31 (IL-31) in psoriasis, only one study has examined histopathological expression in lesional skin. This study aimed to investigate the expression of IL-31 in skin biopsy specimens of psoriasis patients compared to healthy subjects and identify its possible correlation to disease severity and itch intensity. Psoriasis patients and healthy volunteers were recruited. Four-millimeter punch biopsy was performed at the lesional skin of psoriasis patients and normal skin of healthy subjects. Expression of IL-31 was measured by immunohistochemistry. Baseline characteristics, disease activity, itch intensity, and related laboratory results were collected. Twenty-six biopsy specimens of psoriasis patients and 10 tissue samples of healthy subjects were evaluated. Epidermal and dermal psoriasis lesions had significantly higher IL-31 expression compared to the healthy skin (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in lesional expression of IL-31 by disease severity or itch intensity. Increased IL-31 expression in the lesions of psoriasis patients suggests the involvement of IL-31 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.

Factors Associated With Refractoriness to an Up to Fourfold Dosage of Antihistamines in Isolated Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common skin disease and has a significant impact on patients' quality of life. The aim of treatment is complete symptom control. AIM: To identify potential factors associated with antihistamine-refractory isolated CSU and to determine the factors that predict response to second-generation H1 antihistamines at dosages from one- to fourfold. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, which included adult patients diagnosed with isolated CSU and had complete symptom control. Clinical and laboratory findings were compared between the patients who were responsive to second-generation H1 antihistamines (< fourfold) and those who were refractory to a fourfold dose. Clinical and laboratory data were compared by dosage in the antihistamine-responsive group. RESULTS: There were 182 isolated CSU patients who met the study criteria, of whom 150 (82.4%) were responsive to treatment with up to a fourfold dose of second-generation H1 antihistamines, while 32 (17.6%) were refractory. In univariate analysis, age at onset, body mass index, baseline Urticaria Activity Score-7 (UAS7), white blood cell count, total neutrophil count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet count, and new generation antihistamines were significantly higher in the antihistamine-refractory group. According to multivariate analysis, baseline UAS7 was the only independent factor associated with antihistamine-refractory isolated CSU (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28, P = .03). In the antihistamine-responsive group, white blood cell count tended to predict response to antihistamine treatment (P < .001, 0.04, 0.34 between onefold and twofold, twofold and threefold, and threefold and fourfold, respectively). CONCLUSION: Baseline UAS7 was an independent factor associated with antihistamine-refractory isolated CSU.

Anti-retroviral drugs induced photosensitivity may be two culprits in mixed formulation, a case report and literature review.

Although the most frequent presentation of adverse drug events amongst HIV- infected individuals is skin rash, photosensitivity is uncommon. We herein described an HIV-infected female who presented with photo-distributed annular target-like eruptions and small tense blisters. Our patient had objectively reduced erythemal thresholds on broadband UV phototesting, to both UVA and UVB. Resolution of the abnormal responses on retesting undertaken after cessation of the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz in mixed formulation for five months confirmed a diagnosis of drug-induced photosensitivity. Given the preferred first-line anti-retroviral therapy which usually contains both TDF and EFV, photoprotection from broad-band ultraviolet wavelengths should be emphasized for the patients receiving this antiretroviral regimen.

Increased IL-31 expression in serum and tissue protein in prurigo nodularis.

Background: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic pruritic skin disease which can greatly impact patients' quality of life. Moreover, the pathogenesis remains unclear, making it a difficult-to-treat condition. Aims: To investigate the expression of interleukin-31 (IL-31) in serum and skin biopsy specimens of PN patients and healthy subjects and identify its possible correlation to disease severity and itch intensity. Methods: Patients with PN and healthy volunteers were recruited for the study. Expression levels of IL-31 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunohistochemistry. Baseline characteristics, disease activity, itch intensity, and related laboratory results were collected. Results: Forty-three PN patients and 31 healthy subjects participated in our study. The PN patients had significantly higher mean serum IL-31 levels than the healthy subjects (52.9 ± 18.2 versus 36.3 ± 10.7 pg/ml, p < 0.001). Epidermal and dermal PN lesions also exhibited significantly higher IL-31 expression compared with the healthy skin (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in serum or lesional expression of IL-31 by disease severity or itch intensity. Conclusion: Increased IL-31 expression in serum and PN lesions suggests that IL-31 has a potential role in the pathogenesis of PN.

Increased serum IL-31 levels in chronic spontaneous urticaria and psoriasis with pruritic symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common pruritic skin condition, the pathogenesis of which remains unclear. Interleukin-31 (IL-31) is a major pruritogenic cytokine that plays a role in inducing pruritus in various skin diseases. AIM: To 1) compare serum IL-31 levels among CSU patients, psoriasis patients with pruritic symptoms, and healthy subjects, 2) examine the correlations between serum IL-31 levels and disease severity, and 3) compare IL-31 levels in patients with and without CSU-associated auto-antibodies. METHODS: Patients with CSU, psoriasis with pruritic symptoms, and healthy volunteers were recruited in the study. Serum IL-31 levels were measured with commercial kits. Baseline characteristics, urticaria activity score, psoriasis area severity index, pruritic intensity score, and related laboratory results were collected. RESULTS: Sixty-five CSU patients, 30 psoriasis patients who had pruritus, and 31 healthy subjects participated in our study. The CSU patients had significantly higher mean serum IL-31 levels than the psoriasis patients (252.4 ± 115.5 vs 121.4 ± 16.6 pg/mL, P < 0.001). Both CSU and psoriasis patients also had significantly higher mean serum IL-31 when compared with the healthy subjects. Serum IL-31 levels of CSU and psoriasis patients did not differ significantly according to disease or itching severity. Thyroid antibodies and antinuclear antibodies were positive in 22 (33.8%) and 28 (43.1%) CSU patients, respectively. The CSU patients with ANA titers ≥1:160 had significantly higher mean serum IL-31 levels than in those who were negative for ANA and those with titers of 1:80 (P < 0.003 and P < 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: Higher serum IL-31 levels were found in patients with CSU and psoriasis with pruritic symptoms. This suggests that IL-31 has a possible role in the pathogenesis of CSU and psoriasis with pruritic symptoms.

Acral Cutaneous Ulcerations and Livedo Reticularis with Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease in Anti-MDA5 Antibody-Positive Classical Dermatomyositis.

Rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) and its distinctive cutaneous features are highly associated with the presence of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5) antibody in patients with dermatomyositis (DM), leading to a poor prognosis. We describe the case of a 25-year-old man who developed progressive proximal muscle weakness with RP-ILD and had unusual cutaneous findings (cutaneous ulcerations and livedo reticularis) accompanied by classical cutaneous features (heliotrope rash, Gottron's papules, Gottron's sign, and flagellate erythema). Blood test was positive for anti-MDA5 antibody. He was treated with intravenous corticosteroids and immunoglobulin, but passed away due to respiratory failure within 1 month after admission. Our case highlights that the presence of cutaneous ulcerations and livedo reticularis, in addition to RP-ILD, are useful clinical clues that may aid in the detection of anti-MDA5 antibody, early initiation of combined immunosuppressants, and prognosis prediction in patients with classical DM.

Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous levetiracetam (IV LEV) is approved for treatment status epilepticus (SE). However, the drug's high cost must be considered when deciding on a treatment strategy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of brand-name and generic IV LEV for acute repetitive convulsive seizure (ARCS) or SE. METHODS: Forty patients aged 18 years or older who had been diagnosed with SE or ARCS were included in this double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio (via computer-generated code) to receive either brand-name or generic IV LEV. The primary outcomes were seizure control and the number of seizure exacerbations during the 24 h after drug administration, while the secondary outcomes were electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, serious adverse events, and clinical outcome at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomly assigned administration with either brand-name IV LEV (10 SE and 10 ARCS patients) or generic IV LEV; 7 SE and 13 ARCS patients). There was no significant difference in patients' baseline characteristics. The seizure control rate was 75% in the brand-name IV LEV group and 65% in the generic IV LEV group (p value: 0.490). Five (25%) patients in the brand-name IV LEV group, and six (30%) patients in the generic IV LEV group developed seizure exacerbations within 24 h after drug administration (p value 0.723). There were no reports of drug-related adverse events. Two of the patients taking brand-name IV LEV and one taking the generic IV LEV died (p value > 0.999). CONCLUSION: Treatment with the generic IV LEV had comparable outcomes with brand-name IV LEV. The generic IV LEV may be an alternative medication for the treatment of SE and ARCS to reduce treatment costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20190513001. FUNDING: Great Eastern Drug Company.