Medication Optimization Using Pharmacogenomic Testing in a Complex Mental Health Population Prescribed Psychiatric Polypharmacy.

The use of polypharmacy has become significantly more common over the past two decades, increasing the risk of drug-drug interactions and adverse drug reactions. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) assays have the purported benefit of being able to predict an individual's response to a specific medication based on genetic markers, which may facilitate the development of optimized medication regimens for patients prescribed polypharmacy. This 12-week pilot study examined the impact of the PGx results on the clinical management of Veterans who were prescribed psychiatric polypharmacy. Psychiatric medication providers were given access to the PGx assay results, including notification of drug-drug-gene interactions computed from an algorithm decision tool, to assist with medication management decisions. Veteran outpatients (N = 53) prescribed polypharmacy (mean = 13.15 medications) were enrolled into the study. In 92.4% of cases, providers changed medications at baseline, with 83% of providers indicating that they changed their original medication plan based on the PGx results. Clinical improvement over the 12-week treatment phase was seen in depression (F(1.63, 45) = 5.45, P = .01, η2  = .11) and mental health quality of life (F(2.00, 45) = 4.16, P < .05, η2  = .16). Adverse drug effects were unchanged or improved over time. Rates of polypharmacy remained unchanged. The results suggest that medication changes based on the PGx assay may be beneficial in a complex patient population prescribed polypharmacy.

Reduction of Burnout in Mental Health Care Providers Using the Provider Resilience Mobile Application.

This pilot study examined the usability, acceptability, and effectiveness of a free Provider Resilience (PR) mobile application (app) designed by the National Center for Telehealth and Technology to reduce provider burnout. Outpatient mental health providers (N = 30) used the PR app for 1 month. Participants rated the PR app on the System Usability Scale with an overall score of 79.7, which is in the top quartile for usability. Results of paired sample t tests on the Professional Quality of Life Scale indicated significant decreases on the Burnout (t = 3.65, p < .001) and Compassion Fatigue (t = 4.54, p < .001) subscales. The Provider Resilience app shows promise in reducing burnout and compassion fatigue in mental health care providers.

Quetiapine for the treatment of cocaine use disorder.

BACKGROUND: Cocaine addiction continues to be a significant healthcare issue, yet there are no FDA approved medications for the treatment of cocaine use disorder within the United States. METHODS: This 12-week, prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study examined the effectiveness of quetiapine (Seroquel XR™) versus matched placebo for the treatment of DSM-IV cocaine dependence in non-psychotic individuals. Subjects randomized to quetiapine (N = 29) were titrated up to a target dose of 400mg/day of quetiapine, while those in the placebo arm (N = 31) were given a matched placebo. All subjects had weekly clinic visits and a cognitive-behavioral therapy group session. Outcome measures included self-report of cocaine use and money spent on cocaine as well as urine drug screens (UDS). RESULTS: The drop-out rate was substantial at 68%. Logistic regression analysis did not find significant differences between groups in predicting end-of trial abstinence, defined as three consecutive weekly negative UDS (13.7% in the quetiapine group versus 12.9% in the placebo group; p = .92). Based upon a repeated measures analysis of variance, subjects in this study, as a whole, demonstrated reductions in their self-reported use of cocaine, self-reported money spent on cocaine, and number of days per week using cocaine. However, the quetiapine group did not differ significantly from the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not find group differences between the quetiapine and placebo arms, suggesting that quetiapine is not an efficacious treatment for DSM-IV cocaine dependence.

Quetiapine for the treatment of cocaine dependence: an open-label trial.

The monaminergic properties of second generation antipsychotics are prompting research on their use to treat cocaine dependence, with inconclusive results to date. In preliminary reports, the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine has shown promise for the treatment of substance abuse disorders. The primary objective of the current study was to assess the efficacy of quetiapine in reducing cocaine cravings and use in nonpsychotic subjects with cocaine dependence over 6 weeks of open-label treatment. Twenty-two cocaine-dependent, nonpsychotic men were initiated to open-label treatment with quetiapine (300-600 mg/d). The primary outcome measure was weekly self-report of cocaine cravings as assessed with the Brief Substance Craving Scale. Cocaine use was captured with a self-report Timeline Follow-back calendar, administered every 2 weeks. Side effect monitoring was conducted weekly, and movement disorders were assessed every 2 weeks. Intent-to-treat regression analyses (n = 22) indicated that the Brief Substance Craving Scale total score decreased significantly overtime (P < 0.001). Self-reports also suggested decreased cocaine use. There was no treatment-related increase in movement disorders, and most side effects were mild. However, all subjects did experience sedation, and several subjects dropped out because of it. What is more, weight increased significantly over time (P < 0.001). Open-label quetiapine treatment reduced cravings and improved some aspects of cocaine dependence in nonpsychotic individuals. Additional research is needed to confirm the current findings and to further delineate the role quetiapine may play in the treatment of cocaine use disorders.

Abstinence, anticipation, reduction, and treatment (AART): a stepwise approach to the management of atypical antipsychotic side effects.

Antipsychotic medications, specifically the atypical agents, serve as first-line treatment options for patients with psychotic disorders, including individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Atypical antipsychotics are also often prescribed off-label as either the primary treatment or as an adjunctive treatment for individuals with other disorders, including mood disorders without psychosis, behavioral disorders, and insomnia. Despite the generally superior side-effect profiles of atypical antipsychotics compared with typical antipsychotic agents, the atypicals have been associated with a number of serious side effects, including metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disorders, seizures, hyperprolactinemia, and movement disorders. This article offers a stepwise approach to the management of antipsychotic side effects: Abstinence, Anticipation, Reduction, and Treatment (AART). The steps in AART are hierarchical, but often overlap in the areas of risk prevention and minimization. The authors discuss issues relevant to each level of intervention and provide suggestions for integrating the AART approach into a comprehensive treatment plan. By incorporating this stepwise approach into their clinical decision-making process, prescribers may be able to optimize the risk:benefit ratio associated with the prescription of atypical antipsychotics.

Combination antipsychotic therapy in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed, yet few clinical studies have examined this practice. Experts have generally recommended antipsychotic combinations, especially those combining an atypical and a conventional antipsychotic, as a measure of last resort. A survey of prescribers was conducted to examine why combination antipsychotic therapy is being used in outpatient clinical practice. METHODS: Antipsychotic prescribing practices in the Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health System were reviewed for a six-month period during 1998-1999. Data on the use of atypical and conventional antipsychotics in combination were collected. RESULTS: A total of 1,794 patients received prescriptions for at least one antipsychotic medication during the study period, of which 715 (40 percent) received an atypical agent. Ninety-three patients (13 percent) who were treated with an atypical antipsychotic received a prescription for combination antipsychotic therapy for at least 30 days. In cases in which both a conventional and an atypical agent were prescribed, the primary reason given for adding a conventional antipsychotic medication was to treat persistent positive symptoms. The primary reason an atypical agent was added to a conventional agent was to switch medications to the atypical agent; however, a significant number of patients became "stuck" on the combination. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support previous reports of the frequent use of combination antipsychotic therapy in clinical practice. Prospective controlled trials are needed to substantiate perceptions that combination antipsychotic therapy is clinically beneficial and to provide guidelines on when and for whom antipsychotic polypharmacy should be considered.

Depression in Kraepelinian schizophrenia.

In order to improve our understanding of depression in chronic schizophrenia, depressive symptoms were assessed in institutionalized, so called Kraepelinian, patients with schizophrenia (N = 43). The patients had been ill and dependent on others for at least 5 years. Depressive symptoms as measured by the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) scale were less prevalent in this population compared to published data on non-Kraepelinian patients. Only 5% of our Kraepelinian patients had a HAM-D score >/= 16. There was also a low prevalence of core depressive symptoms (depressed mood, suicidal ideation, and guilt). The relationship of depression to other dimensions of schizophrenia was explored. Depression had a modest positive correlation (r = 0.44) with general psychopathology as measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), but not with positive symptoms as measured by BPRS positive subscale or negative symptoms as measured by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Depression also showed a modest positive correlation (r =.48) using the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SAS) for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). These results indicate that in Kraepelinian schizophrenia, depression is not prevalent, even though patients are severely ill both in symptom and functioning domains. The results of our analysis support that Kraepelinian schizophrenia is a distinct subtype, and raise questions regarding the boundary between schizoaffective disorder and non-Kraepelinian schizophrenia. Finally, the low rate of depression observed revives the notion that preservation of core functional abilities is important for a depressive reaction to evolve in schizophrenia.