Hepatitis C virus infection among First Nation and non-First Nation people in Manitoba, Canada: a public health laboratory study.

Demographic information and laboratory test results on 136 169 clinical serum specimens submitted to the public health laboratory in Manitoba, Canada, for hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing between January 1995 and December 2003 were analyzed. The difference in the clearance rates of HCV infection, without therapeutic intervention, and the HCV genotypes infecting First Nation and non-First Nation people were studied. The rates of co-infection of HCV-positive individuals with other hepatitis viruses were also compared between the two study groups. The results of the analyses of the data indicated that there was a 4.4-fold increase in the number of specimens tested and a 4.9-fold decrease in HCV antibody (anti-HCV) positive cases during the study period. The proportion of specimens submitted for testing from First Nation individuals was lower than their proportion in the Manitoba population. Our study also indicated that there was a significantly higher proportion of First Nation patients who had self-limiting infection (patients cleared the infection and became HCV RNA negative without anti-HCV treatment) in comparison to non-First Nation patients. The proportion of First Nation females who had self-limiting infection was significantly higher than non-First Nation females. HCV genotype 1 infection represented more than 60% of HCV infection in Manitoba. The rate of individuals positive for the hepatitis A virus antibody in the HCV-positive population was higher among First Nation than non-First Nation individuals. On the other hand, there were more HCV-infected First Nation patients than non-First Nation patients who were not immune to the hepatitis B virus. The data indicate that fewer First Nation patients seek anti-HCV therapy in comparison to non-First Nation. In conclusion, the differences in the rates of HCV self-limiting infection between First Nation and non-First Nation individuals in Manitoba may reflect the genetic differences between the two cohorts, which may consequently affect the immune response to the HCV infection.

A population-based approach to determine the prevalence of transmitted drug-resistant HIV among recent versus established HIV infections: results from the Canadian HIV strain and drug resistance surveillance program.

OBJECTIVES: Published results on primary or transmitted HIV drug resistance may be biased because they have been largely derived from specific cohort studies or higher risk individuals who present symptomatically. Here, we present results from a representative population-based study of newly diagnosed cases of HIV in Canada and compare the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance between recent and established infections. METHODS: Available archived sera taken for the purpose of diagnostic HIV testing from all treatment-naive HIV-positive individuals who were newly diagnosed between 2000 and 2001 were tested for recency of infection, HIV-1 subtype, and mutations conferring reduced susceptibility to reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors (PIs). Recent infections were identified using the Organon Teknika Vironostika HIV-1-LS assay. After full-length sequencing of the pol gene, drug resistance mutations were identified using the 2004 International AIDS Society-USA mutations panel. Differences in drug resistance profiles between recent and prevalent infections were examined using the chi test and the Fisher exact test. The variables examined included gender, age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, exposure category, ethnicity, and HIV-1 subtype. RESULTS: Among the study population, 8.1% had genotypic evidence of transmitted drug resistance: 4.1% against nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 1.4% against nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 1.5% against PIs, and 1% against > or =2 classes of drugs. A higher proportion of recent infections had genotypic evidence of transmitted drug resistance when compared with established infections (12.2% vs. 6.1%, respectively; P = 0.005). Transmitted drug resistance was identified mainly among recently infected Caucasian men who have sex with men but it was not limited to this group. Compared with the year 2000, a higher proportion of recently infected individuals with resistance-conferring mutations were diagnosed during the year 2001 (66.7% vs. 46.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In Canada, transmitted drug resistance is occurring within all 3 drug classes and across different population groups. The results suggest that the prevalence rates may be higher among recent versus established infections. Given the public health implications of transmitting drug-resistant HIV, it is important to continue population-based drug resistance surveillance to guide optimum prevention and treatment of HIV infection.