EMPOWER: Toward the Global Dissemination of Psychosocial Interventions.

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, the needs for care of persons with mental illness remained largely unmet worldwide, testifying to the inadequacy of current approaches to mental health care and their unsuitability for the rising demand. One hurdle to improved access to quality care is the reliance on expensive specialist providers, particularly for the delivery of psychosocial interventions. This article describes EMPOWER, a not-for-profit program that builds on the clinical science demonstrating the effectiveness of brief psychosocial interventions for a range of psychiatric conditions; implementation science demonstrating the effectiveness of delivery of these interventions by non-specialist providers (NSPs); and pedagogical science demonstrating the effectiveness of digital approaches for training and quality assurance. The EMPOWER program leverages digital tools for training and supervising NSPs, designing competency-based curricula, assessing treatment-specific competencies, implementing measurement-based peer supervision for support and quality assurance, and evaluating impacts to enhance the effectiveness of the delivery system.

Video-augmentation of the informed consent process in mental health research: An exploratory study from India.

Only around 50-75% of individuals fully understand the various aspects of informed consent in research. The aim of our study was to examine whether supplementing the conventional paper-based informed consent process with an audiovisual aid improves participants' understanding of the informed consent process and the information conveyed to them. Participants from two mental health/substance use intervention development studies were recruited for this study through consecutive sampling. They were then administered the traditional paper information and consenting process by itself or in combination with a video depicting the procedures of the study. Subsequently a bespoke questionnaire was administered to assess the participants' understanding of the information conveyed to them about the parent study. The various domains of the questionnaire were compared between those who were administered the two different consenting processes using the chi square test. 27 (58.7%) participants were administered the traditional consenting process and 19 were administered the video-supplemented consenting process. The video-supplemented consenting process was not superior to the traditional paper-based informed consent process on any of the domains examined. In settings with participants having a limited education, and in research involving people with mental health or substance use problems, further research is necessary to identify contextually relevant best practices for the informed consent process.

"I will not step back": A Qualitative Study of Lay Mental Health Workers' Experiences in India.

A significant treatment gap exists for mental illnesses across the world, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Task-sharing, a potentially scalable strategy to bridge the treatment gap, has been shown to be feasible and effective for the treatment of a range of mental illnesses. However, there is a lack of research examining lay mental health workers' experiences in such task-sharing roles. The aim of our study was to understand the barriers and facilitators that lay health workers (LHWs) face in delivering mental healthcare. We conducted in-depth interviews with 32 lay mental health workers recruited through maximum variation sampling and 18 stakeholders leading mental health programs at a variety of non-governmental organisations across India. Interviews were semi-structured and data was analyzed using the thematic analysis approach. Results showed that LHWs perceived barriers and facilitators at three levels: individually (related to personal characteristics and family support, and in their daily work such as in relationship building and supervision), organizationally (for example, related to compensation), and societally (such as encountering gender discrimination and stigma). Each of these areas should be taken into consideration when planning and implementing task-sharing interventions for mental illnesses. As the first qualitative study to explore broad LHW experiences in mental healthcare delivery in a diverse set of programs from a LMIC, this study shows that LHW voices should be central to program design and decision-making for mental health interventions.

Auditing the AUDIT: A systematic review of cut-off scores for the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in low- and middle-income countries.

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization's (WHO) Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is used extensively across the world, with cut-off scores recommended by the WHO. We reviewed the use and validity of AUDIT cut-off scores in low- and middle-income countries as cultural contexts are expected to influence the detection of alcohol use disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review was guided by an a priori defined protocol consistent with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. We searched Cochrane library, Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Indmed, LILACS, and AJOL databases using appropriate search terms. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the data. RESULTS: We identified 54 distinct studies that used AUDIT cut-off scores which were not in alignment with those recommended by the WHO. India (n = 10), Nigeria (n = 9), and Brazil (n = 9) produced most of these included studies. Most of the studies (n = 42) did not conduct psychometric evaluations of AUDIT cut-off scores. Of the twelve studies which did report psychometric results, a wide range of cut-off scores performed well. In these studies the cut-off scores to detect hazardous drinking ranged from >3 to >5, for harmful drinking from >5 to >16, and for dependent drinking from >7 to >24. DISCUSSION: AUDIT is being widely used in LMICs and non-recommended cut-off scores are considered to be appropriate in these countries. It is important to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties of those cut-off scores to ensure the internal validity of the studies in which they are used.