RESUMO
When a drop of liquid is placed on the surface of a soft material, the surface deformation and the rate of spreading of the triple contact point is dependent on the mechanical properties of the substrate. This study seeks to use drop spreading behavior to infer the mechanical properties of soft biological materials. As an illustration of the value of this technique we have compared the spreading behavior of a liquid droplet on two viscoelastic, soft materials, namely, an elastomer and a low concentration agar gel. The ratio of the mechanical properties of these soft materials obtained in this way is confirmed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation. By comparing the spreading behavior of a liquid on the retina with that of the same liquid on each of two viscoelastic materials, we can then estimate the elastic moduli of the retina: an estimate that is extremely difficult to carry out using AFM.
Assuntos
Elasticidade , Retina/química , Animais , Microscopia de Força Atômica/métodos , Retina/ultraestrutura , Propriedades de Superfície , SuínosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine whether uveal effusion syndrome (UES) is caused by altered scleral permeability to water and large molecules. METHODS: Transscleral water movement was measured using surgically removed sclera clamped in a modified Ussing chamber and connected to a water column set at intraocular pressure. Sclera was also clamped between two hemichambers, and transscleral diffusion of FITC-dextrans (4.4-77 kDa) was measured with a spectrophotometer. Clinical data were prospectively collected using postal questionnaires. RESULTS: Ten patients (mean age, 63 years; mean spherical equivalent, +4.7 D) had a median preoperative visual acuity of 0.20 that improved to 0.33 after surgery. Nine eyes showed visual improvement, three worsened, and two were unchanged. Histology showed disorganization of collagen fibrils, with amorphous deposits expanding the interfibrillary spaces. The mean thickness (+/-1 SD) of the excised scleral specimens was 585 +/- 309 microm, and the mean specific hydraulic conductivity was 23.9 +/- 27.5 x 10(-14) cm(2), compared with 5.8 +/- 3.9 x 10(-14) cm(2) in age-matched control specimens (P = 0.068). Three specimens had hydraulic conductivity above the 95% CI of the controls. Control eyes showed a significant reduction in diffusion coefficient (D) with age. Eyes had a mean D of 5.69 +/- 5.35 x 10(-8) cm(2) x s(-1), similar to control eyes (6.14 +/- 2.40 x 10(-8) cm(2) x s(-1), 20 kDa dextran). In one eye, the result was higher than the 95% CI of the control; in three, it was lower. CONCLUSIONS: UES is not caused by reduced scleral hydraulic conductivity, which tends to be higher than expected. Reduced macromolecular diffusion may impede the normal transscleral egress of albumin with subsequent osmotic fluid retention in some, but not all eyes.