Optoelectronic plethysmography demonstrates abrogation of regional chest wall motion dysfunction in patients with pectus excavatum after Nuss repair.

PURPOSE: We previously demonstrated that patients with pectus excavatum (PE) have significantly decreased chest wall motion at the pectus defect compared with the rest of the chest vs unaffected individuals and use abdominal respiratory contributions to compensate for decreased upper chest wall motion. We hypothesize that PE repair will reverse chest wall motion dysfunction. METHODS: A prospective, institutional review board-approved study compared patients with PE before and after Nuss repair. Informed consent was obtained before motion analysis. Sixty-four patients with uncorrected PE ages 10 to 21 years underwent optoelectronic plethysmography analysis. Repeat analysis was performed in 42 patients 6 months postoperative (PO). RESULTS: Volume of the chest wall and its subdivisions were calculated. Total chest wall volume at rest was significantly increased after repair and in each thoracic compartment. PO patients developed increased midline marker excursion at the pectus defect and significantly decreased excursion at the level of the umbilicus. CONCLUSIONS: Optoelectronic plethysmography kinematic analysis demonstrates that chest wall remodeling during Nuss repair results in increased thoracic volume. Chest wall motion dysfunction at the pectus defect is reversed after Nuss repair. Abdominal respiratory contributions are also markedly decreased. These findings may help to explain why patients with PE report an improvement in endurance after the Nuss procedure.

Regional chest wall motion dysfunction in patients with pectus excavatum demonstrated via optoelectronic plethysmography.

BACKGROUND: Paradoxical chest wall motion is recognized clinically in pectus excavatum (PE). We report chest wall volume and motion differences between PE patients and unaffected individuals. METHODS: A prospective, institutional review board-approved study compared nonoperated PE patients with normal controls (C). Subjects had deep breathing maneuvers captured by infrared cameras. Chest wall volume and excursion were calculated using optoelectronic plethysmography marker reconstruction combined with proprietary software (BTS Bioengineering, Milan, Italy). RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients underwent optoelectronic plethysmography analysis (PE: 64, C: 5). Total chest wall volume at rest was similar in both groups (PE: 13.6 L, C: 14.1 L, P = .55). During maximal inspiration, PE patients had a significant increase in the volume within the abdominal rib cage compartment (PE: 0.77 L, C: 0.6 L, P < .01). Patients with PE had 51% less midline marker excursion at the angle of Louis (P < .01), a 46% decrease at the level of the nipples (P < .01), and 28% less excursion at the xiphoid process (P = .02). At the level of the umbilicus, PE patients had 147% increase in midline marker excursion compared with controls (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Optoelectronic plethysmography kinematic analysis allows for quantification of focal chest wall motion dysfunction. Patients with PE demonstrate significantly decreased chest wall motion at the area of the pectus defect and increased abdominal contributions to respiration compared with controls. This finding may help to explain exertional symptoms of easy fatigability or shortness of breath in PE.