Activities to promote empathy for patients among pharmacy learners: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Provider empathy has been shown to be directly linked to improved patient outcomes. The objective of this scoping review of the literature was to identify and describe learning activities that promote empathy for patients among pharmacy learners. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted using the following inclusion criteria: publication in English, activities conducted in any academic pharmacy training program (professional degree program, experiential, residency, or fellowship), description of the learning activity(ies) provided, and focus on the experience of empathy/caring/compassion for patients, either human or animal. Articles were excluded if they focused only on skills such as empathic responding or if they did not describe the learning experience. All study designs other than reviews were included. RESULTS: The scoping review revealed 89 full-text articles that met the inclusion criteria. Included studies demonstrated a wide variety of approaches to the design of learning experiences as well as methods of measurement of empathy. Various types of learning modalities have been used to develop empathy in pharmacy learners, with reflection being the most common. A large proportion of studies that assessed empathy development used quasi-experimental or qualitative designs and did not report tests of statistical significance, which would make it difficult to compare the effectiveness of the different learning activities. IMPLICATIONS: A variety of approaches have been used among pharmacy learners to develop empathy for patients. Due to the high level of variability in approaches, more rigorous studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of these learning activities.

High-level curricular integration in pharmacy schools: A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacy school accreditors recommend curricular integration. With today's complex health care system, there is also a need for more intentional and seamless blending, characterizing what we propose as "high-level curricular integration" (i.e. intentional "weaving" of multiple disciplines to form a coherent whole). Despite accreditors' recommendations, the practical definition and implementation guidelines of high-level curricular integration are not clear. We aimed to describe high-level curricular integration practices in pharmacy schools by systematically reviewing the literature addressing four elements of high-level curricular integration. These were (1) organizational thread, (2) pedagogies, (3) evaluation strategies, and (4) barriers. METHODS: A PRISMA-guided (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) literature search strategy was conducted to examine the scientific literature. Inclusion criteria were English written literature related to one or more of the four elements of high-level curricular integration in pharmacy schools. RESULTS: After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 28 articles were included. The most used organizational thread was disease-oriented (n = 8, 28.5%), and the most reported pedagogy was case studies (n = 11, 39%). Over half of the studies reported how the integration experience was evaluated. Most studies addressed barriers (n = 21, 75%), with the most reported barriers being time (n = 12, 42%) and workload (n = 12, 42%). IMPLICATIONS: This review aimed to define and describe high-level integration within schools of pharmacy through four elements. Numerous and diverse trends were identified, and these four elements should be considered when planning, implementing, evaluating, and reporting curriculum integration experiences.

Effect of Interprofessional Clinical Debates on Attitudes of Interprofessional Teams.

INTRODUCTION: Current evidence supports the notion of debates as a pedagogical method to teach literature evaluation skills in health care education; however, there are no reports of this method as an interprofessional approach and its potential benefits. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of interprofessional clinical debates on attitudes toward interprofessional teamwork and perceived literature evaluation skills. METHODS: We invited third-year family medicine residents and fourth-year pharmacy students to complete a survey before and after participating in an interprofessional clinical debate. The anonymous survey was composed of the Students' Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education-Revised (SPICE-R2) instrument to evaluate perceptions of interprofessional teamwork, literature evaluation, and other skills gained through the process. We evaluated matched responses for change in attitudes toward interprofessional teams. RESULTS: We evaluated 41 matched responses, which indicated improvement in attitudes toward interprofessional teams and was statistically significant ( P<.001). This finding held true for subscales of roles/responsibilities for collaborative practice and patient outcomes from collaborative practice (P<.001). Participants also perceived improvements in literature evaluation, problem-solving, critical thinking, teamwork, and communication skills. CONCLUSION: The interprofessional clinical debate activity positively impacted medical residents and pharmacy students, and improved attitudes toward interprofessional teams.

Health Care Costs Associated with Addition, Titration, and Switching Antihypertensive Medications After First-Line Treatment: Results from a Commercially Insured Sample.

BACKGROUND: Treatment modifications are necessary for addressing issues related to efficacy and tolerance of first-line monotherapy, but they increase the economic burden on patients and their health plans. Understanding the differences in costs between alternative treatment modification strategies, if any, can serve as a guideline for clinical decision making and for designing cost-containment strategies. OBJECTIVE: To compare the health care utilization costs between (a) addition (i.e., use of free-pill combinations [FPCs] or fixed-dose combinations [FDCs]) and uptitration as alternatives for addressing efficacy issues and (b) switching and downtitration as alternatives for addressing tolerance issues with first-line antihypertensive monotherapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that used the 2008-2012 BlueCross BlueShield of Texas claims database. Patients who had a treatment modification within 12 months of initiating antihypertensive monotherapy were identified. All-cause and disease-related health care utilization costs and drug costs were estimated from the BlueCross BlueShield health plan's perspective over a 12-month period, starting from the date of treatment modification. Propensity score-adjusted generalized linear models were used to compare costs between alternative treatment modification strategies. RESULTS: We identified 5,998 patients who met study criteria and had a modification of treatment: FPC (n = 1,395), FDC (n = 1,207), uptitration (n = 1,659), switching (n = 1,282), and downtitration (n = 455). All-cause and disease-related health services utilization costs were estimated for 12 months following treatment modification. Mean annual drug utilization costs were highest for the FDC strategy. All-cause inpatient and outpatient services utilization costs were significantly different between strategies used for addressing issues of tolerance and efficacy, respectively. Disease-related inpatient services utilization costs were lower for the FDC strategy compared with the uptitration strategy. However, disease-related inpatient services utilization costs were not significantly different for the downtitration strategy compared with the switch strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Health care costs following treatment modifications vary by type of strategy. The high costs of FDCs may be offset by the reduction of inpatient services utilization costs. Careful consideration should be given to the differences in costs between alternative strategies. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The dataset used in this study was created for dissertational research on the patterns and outcomes of treatment modification in hypertensive patients. Data and database support were provided by University of Texas School of Public Health/BlueCross BlueShield of Texas research program in payment systems and policy. Sonawane Deshmukh was an employee of Anthem BlueCross BlueShield from August 2015 to August 2016. Hansen has received consulting funds from Daichii Sankyo and has provided expert testimony for Allergan and Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors have no known conflicts of interest. Study concept and design were contributed by Sonawane Deshmukh, Garza, Wright, and Hansen. Sonawane Deshmukh and Ganduglia Cazaban collected the data, and data interpretation was performed by Sonawane Deshmukh, Qian, Wright, and Zeng. The manuscript was written primarily by Sonawane Deshmukh, along with Qian and Garza, and revised by Sonawane Deshmukh, Qian, Ganduglia Cazaban, and Hansen.

Achieving Adherence After First-Line Antihypertensive Treatment: Should Fixed-Dose Combinations Receive Priority?

Data on the long-term outcomes of the use of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) or free-pill combinations (FPCs), titration of doses, and switching are currently unavailable for identifying a preferred strategy for adherence. In the lack of these evidences, adherence can be a useful guiding criteria. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study using the BlueCross BlueShield of Texas (2008-2012) database to compare adherence among 5998 patients who received treatment modifications (TMs). Results of the propensity score-adjusted model indicate that FDC and uptitration strategies have higher odds of adherence compared with the switch strategy (P<.05). Among patients with a history of poor adherence, the odds of adherence were up to 26% higher for the FDC strategy compared with alternative strategies (P<.05). Factors including age, number of comedications, first-line drug class, and health services utilization are associated with adherence. In conclusion, FDCs should be prioritized for TM, particularly if the patient has a history of poor adherence.

Patterns of treatment modifications among newly treated hypertensive patients: does choice of modification strategy affect likelihood of treatment discontinuation?

OBJECTIVES: Treatment modifications--addition, uptitration, switching, and downtitration--are necessary to address issues such as unattained blood pressure goals, adverse drug events, drug cost, or patient dissatisfaction which lead to treatment discontinuation. This study assessed the patterns of treatment modifications, and compared the rates of treatment modification and time-to-treatment modification across five antihypertensive drug classes (ADCs). Additionally, the association between treatment modification strategies and the likelihood of treatment discontinuation was assessed. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the BlueCross-BlueShield of Texas commercial claims database (2008-2012). Treatment modifications that occurred within 1 year of starting hypertension treatment were identified. Patients who received treatment modifications were followed for 12 months to determine if and when they discontinued treatment. Cox regression models were used to determine the likelihood of treatment modification and treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: About 48.5% of patients received treatment modifications within 1 year of treatment initiation. Rates of treatment modification were significantly different across ADCs; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker users were less likely to receive treatment modifications compared with other ADCs. Mean time-to-treatment modification was more than 100 days for adding and uptitrating, and more than 140 days for switching and downtitrating. Patients intensifying treatment by adding medications were about 25% (vs. uptitration) and 50% (vs. switching) less likely to discontinue treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment modifications are common among newly treated hypertensive patients, and the rates vary significantly across ADCs. In the real world, treatment modifications occur much later than the 30-day timeline recommended by guidelines. Addition of drugs may be a preferred approach for intensifying treatment of patients at a high risk of treatment discontinuation.

The role of aclidinium bromide in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

INTRODUCTION: Inhaled bronchodilators remain a cornerstone of treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); current guidelines recommend initiating inhaled bronchodilators as either monotherapy or combination therapy depending on disease severity and exacerbation risk to improve air flow and reduce breathlessness. Aclidinium bromide is a twice-daily, long-acting muscarinic antagonist recently approved in the United States and Europe and carries significant promise as an alternative long-acting inhaled antimuscarinic agent for the treatment of moderate-to-severe COPD. OBJECTIVE: This review describes the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects of aclidinium bromide. DISCUSSION: Clinical trials have demonstrated improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, nighttime symptom control, disease-related quality of life, and delay in time to first COPD exacerbation with aclidinium use compared with placebo. Commonly reported adverse effects include headache, nasopharyngitis, and cough. One trial reported narrow-angle glaucoma; however, no other serious adverse events have been reported to date. CONCLUSION: Overall, aclidinium bromide has been found to be safe and effective for the treatment of moderate-to-severe COPD. Further clinical trials comparing aclidinium bromide to standard therapies are needed to fully elucidate its role in the treatment of COPD.

The polyamine catabolic enzyme SAT1 modulates tumorigenesis and radiation response in GBM.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and severe form of brain cancer. The median survival time of patients is approximately 12 months due to poor responses to surgery and chemoradiation. To understand the mechanisms involved in radioresistance, we conducted a genetic screen using an shRNA library to identify genes in which inhibition would sensitize cells to radiation. The results were cross-referenced with the Oncomine and Rembrandt databases to focus on genes that are highly expressed in GBM tumors and associated with poor patient outcomes. Spermidine/spermine-N1-acetyltransferase 1 (SAT1), an enzyme involved in polyamine catabolism, was identified as a gene that promotes resistance to ionizing radiation (IR), is overexpressed in brain tumors, and correlates with poor outcomes. Knockdown of SAT1 using shRNA and siRNA approaches in multiple cell and neurosphere lines resulted in sensitization of GBM cells to radiation in colony formation assays and tumors, and decreased tumorigenesis in vivo. Radiosensitization occurred specifically in G2-M and S phases, suggesting a role for SAT1 in homologous recombination (HR) that was confirmed in a DR-GFP reporter system. Mechanistically, we found that SAT1 promotes acetylation of histone H3, suggesting a new role of SAT1 in chromatin remodeling and regulation of gene expression. In particular, SAT1 depletion led to a dramatic reduction in BRCA1 expression, explaining decreased HR capacity. Our findings suggest that the biologic significance of elevated SAT1 expression in GBM lies in its contribution to cell radioresistance and that SAT1 may potentially be a therapeutic target to sensitize GBM to cancer therapies.

Augmentation with atypical antipsychotics for depression: a review of evidence-based support from the medical literature.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic mental illness that affects an estimated 5-26% of adults at some time in their lives. Treatment is often started as pharmacotherapy using a single drug such as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. If a patient fails to respond adequately to the initial antidepressant, typically three pharmacotherapy options are available to the practitioner. The dose of the current therapy can be maximized, a change can be made to a different drug, or the current regimen can be augmented with another drug. Atypical antipsychotics have recently become a major focus for augmentation of traditional antidepressant therapy. This review summarizes the evidence for efficacy and safety of augmenting treatment-refractory or treatment-resistant depression with atypical antipsychotics. The National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE database was searched for all English-language articles published from January 1966-December 2011 describing the use of atypical antipsychotics in treatment-resistant depression. The literature retrieved was limited to case series, open-label trials, and randomized controlled trials (RCT). Studies of bipolar depression, psychotic depression, or studies conducted in children and adolescents were excluded. Thirty-five studies using atypical antipsychotics for augmentation treatment of depression were included in this analysis. Trials were identified for aripiprazole (six open-label; three RCT), clozapine (one case series), olanzapine (three open-label, including two case series; four RCT), quetiapine (four open-label; five RCT), risperidone (two open-label; five RCT), and ziprasidone (two open-label). The atypical antipsychotics may be effective as adjunctive therapy in MDD; however, their adverse effect profile may be unfavorable to some patients. Trying at least one alternative treatment strategy after an initial antidepressant is indicated before augmentation is implemented with these agents. If atypical antipsychotics are used, safety and efficacy should be frequently reassessed and dosage should be individualized.

Evaluation and pharmacologic approach to patients with resistant hypertension.

Patients are diagnosed as having resistant hypertension when they have blood pressure readings that remain above goal despite the concomitant use of 3 optimally dosed antihypertensive agents from different classes, with 1 of the agents being a diuretic. Prior to diagnosing a patient as having resistant hypertension, it is important to document adherence and exclude white-coat hypertension, inaccurate measurement of blood pressure, and secondary causes of hypertension (eg, aldosterone excess). After determining resistance, optimization of the medication regimen is essential. Combination strategies, which might include dual renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade with spironolactone as 1 agent, have been proven successful. This article focuses on the safety and efficacy of spironolactone when added to an optimized 3-drug regimen. Additionally, the use of spironolactone in chronic kidney disease and obstructive sleep apnea complicated by resistant hypertension is discussed. These 2 clinical entities are frequently accompanied by resistant hypertension and are indications for the use of spironolactone as well.

Retrospective Analysis of Clinical and Cost Outcomes Associated with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Treated with Daptomycin, Vancomycin, or Linezolid.

Objective. The objective of this analysis was to compare clinical and cost outcomes associated with patients who had suspected or documented methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections treated with daptomycin, vancomycin, or linezolid in complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs). Design. This was a retrospective analysis conducted from February to June of 2007. Appropriate data was collected, collated, and subsequently evaluated with the purpose of quantifying length of stay, antibiotic therapy duration, clinical cure rates, adverse drug events, and cost of hospitalization. Results. All 82 patients included in the analysis experienced clinical cure. The duration of antibiotic therapy was similar among the three groups yet the length of hospitalization was slightly shorter in the daptomycin group. Conclusions. The incidence of resistant staphylococcal infections is increasing; therefore, judicious use of MRSA active agents is paramount. Future studies are necessary to determine if MRSA treatment options can be stratified based on the severity of the infectious process.

Alternate-day statin therapy for the treatment of hyperlipidemia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost of alternate-day statin therapy in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches were conducted for primary literature sources involving alternative statin regimens using PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (January 1966-March 2010). Articles selected were limited to those published in the English language. Reference citations from relevant publications identified were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language articles identified were reviewed and 17 trials (14 prospective and 3 retrospective) involving alternate-day statin dosing were included. Studies involving alternative statin dosing regimens other than alternating days were excluded from this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Daily administration of statins is the standard of therapy used to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels as well as atherosclerosis that may lead to coronary events. Through LDL-C lowering and pleiotropic effects, statins decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, due to cost and adverse effects of statins, some patients are nonadherent to statin therapy. Several small studies have found alternate-day statin therapy to be as effective at reducing LDL-C as daily administration, while also lowering the incidence of adverse reactions and potentially lowering cost. CONCLUSIONS: Alternate-day statin therapy may decrease cost and therapy-limiting adverse reactions while potentially increasing regimen adherence and positively affecting the lipid panel. Further research is needed to determine whether this alternative regimen produces similar cardiovascular outcomes as those with daily statin therapy.

A review of insulin pen devices.

Optimization of glycemic control is a fundamental aspect of diabetes management, and rates of diabetes-related microvascular complications are significantly decreased when glycemic control is improved. Currently, > 5 million Americans require insulin therapy to manage their diabetes, and this number is expected to multiply as the prevalence of type 2 diabetes increases secondary to several factors. The distinct pharmacodynamic properties of each insulin product help physicians decide which type of insulin is the most appropriate for each patient. The method of delivery that will ensure both patient and provider satisfaction must also be carefully considered. Insulin pen devices are designed to provide a convenient and easy means of insulin administration for the patient and can be divided into 2 categories: the reusable, durable pen, and the disposable, prefilled pen. These insulin pen devices are an alternative to the traditional insulin vial-and-syringe method and offer many advantages. Insulin pens have also been found to be less painful than the vial-and-syringe method and are often associated with greater patient preference and social acceptability. As a result, this method of insulin delivery may ultimately help to improve glycemic control and should be considered when prescribing insulin products.

A review of insulin pen devices and use in the elderly diabetic population.

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the elderly population currently represents almost one-half of the overall diabetic population. Treatment of DM often requires a multidrug regimen that includes insulin therapy; however, due to concomitant comorbidities such as dementia, vision loss, neuropathies, poor mobility, and poor manual dexterity, elderly patients may be at increase risk for hypoglycemia and other dosing errors that are associated with insulin administration. Insulin pen devices have been shown to provide more reliable, accurate, and simplified dosing, and therefore may be a safer, easier, and more acceptable method of insulin delivery in the elderly population. This review will describe the various insulin pen devices available today, as well as discuss the potential advantages of these devices in the elderly population.