Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Fam Med ; 45(6): 424-7, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23743943

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Family medicine residents increasingly work collaboratively with psychology trainees. One type of collaborative experience involves dual interviewing of clinic patients. The goal of this observational study was to provide an initial description of what occurs during dual interviews as it relates to behavioral health assessments and interventions. METHODS: Psychology trainees provided detailed descriptions of 550 collaborative patient encounters involving 348 patients from the Wayne State University/Crittenton Family Medicine Residency clinic. Psychology trainees coded the frequency of behavioral health assessments and interventions by the resident, psychology trainee, or both. RESULTS: Eighty percent of the encounters contained a behavioral health assessment, and 29% contained a behavioral health intervention. Most of these clinical activities were collaboratively done. Interestingly, residents and psychology trainees tended to provide different behavioral health interventions. Moreover, residents provided different behavioral health interventions in repeat dual interviews (n=202) as opposed to first-time visits (n=348), while psychology trainees did not. CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about the process of dual interviewing, and this study is an important first step in describing how residents and psychology trainees actually interact during these encounters. More research is needed about the impact of dual interviewing on residents' behavior.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/educação , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Entrevistas como Assunto/métodos , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos
2.
Am J Public Health ; 103(5): 938-42, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22994177

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We assessed expected ethics competencies of public health professionals in codes and competencies, reviewed ethics instruction at schools of public health, and recommended ways to bridge the gap between them. METHODS: We reviewed the code of ethics and 3 sets of competencies, separating ethics-related competencies into 3 domains: professional, research, and public health. We reviewed ethics course requirements in 2010-2011 on the Internet sites of 46 graduate schools of public health and categorized courses as required, not required, or undetermined. RESULTS: Half of schools (n = 23) required an ethics course for graduation (master's or doctoral level), 21 did not, and 2 had no information. Sixteen of 23 required courses were 3-credit courses. Course content varied from 1 ethics topic to many topics addressing multiple ethics domains. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent ethics education and competency evaluation can be accomplished through a combination of a required course addressing the 3 domains, integration of ethics topics in other courses, and "booster" trainings. Enhancing ethics competence of public health professionals is important to address the ethical questions that arise in public health research, surveillance, practice, and policy.


Assuntos
Bioética/educação , Educação Profissional em Saúde Pública/normas , Competência Profissional/normas , Prática de Saúde Pública/ética , Faculdades de Saúde Pública/normas , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação/normas , Educação de Pós-Graduação/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação Profissional em Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , América do Norte , Faculdades de Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...