Improved vascular function and functional capacity following l-citrulline administration in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a single-arm, open-label, prospective pilot study.

There is accumulating evidence for both peripheral vascular dysfunction and impaired functional capacity in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Although derangements in the l-arginine-nitric oxide (l-Arg-NO) pathway are likely to contribute to these aspects of HFpEF pathophysiology, the impact of increased NO substrate on vascular health and physical capacity has not been evaluated in this patient population. Thus, using a single-arm study design, we evaluated the impact of enteral l-citrulline (l-Cit, 6 g/day for 7 days), a precursor for l-Arg biosynthesis, on vascular function [flow-mediated dilation (FMD), reactive hyperemia (RH), and passive limb movement (PLM)], functional capacity [6-min walk test (6MWT)], and biomarkers of l-Arg-NO signaling in 14 patients with HFpEF (n = 14, 4 M/10 F, 70 ± 10 yr, EF: 66 ± 7%). Compared with baseline (0d), 7 days of l-Cit administration improved FMD (0d: 2.5 ± 1.6%, 7d: 4.5 ± 2.9%), RH (0d: 468 ± 167 mL, 7d: 577 ± 199 mL), PLM blood flow area-under-the-curve (0d: 139 ± 130 mL, 7d: 198 ± 115 mL), and 6MWT distance (0d: 377 ± 27 m, 7d: 397 ± 27 m) (P < 0.05). An increase in plasma l-Cit (0d: 42 ± 11 µM/L, 7d: 369 ± 201 µM/L), l-Arg (0d: 65 ± 8 µM/L, 7d: 257 ± 25 µM/L), and the ratio of l-Arg to asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) (0d: 136 ± 13 AU, 7d: 481 ± 49 AU) (P < 0.05) was also observed. Though preliminary in nature, these functional and biomarker assessments demonstrate a potential benefit of l-Cit administration in patients with HFpEF, findings that provide new insight into the mechanisms that govern vascular and physical dysfunction in this patient group.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The current investigation has demonstrated that l-Cit administration may improve brachial artery endothelium-dependent vasodilation, upper and lower limb microvascular function, and physical capacity in patients with HFpEF, highlighting the potential therapeutic potential of interventions targeting the l-Arg-NO signaling cascade to improve outcomes in this patient group.

Cardiovascular responses to rhythmic handgrip exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Although the contribution of noncardiac complications to the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have been increasingly recognized, disease-related changes in peripheral vascular control remain poorly understood. We utilized small muscle mass handgrip exercise to concomitantly evaluate exercising muscle blood flow and conduit vessel endothelium-dependent vasodilation in individuals with HFpEF (n = 25) compared with hypertensive controls (HTN) (n = 25). Heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP), brachial artery blood velocity, and brachial artery diameter were assessed during progressive intermittent handgrip (HG) exercise [15-30-45% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)]. Forearm blood flow (FBF) and vascular conductance (FVC) were determined to quantify the peripheral hemodynamic response to HG exercise, and changes in brachial artery diameter were evaluated to assess endothelium-dependent vasodilation. HR, SV, and CO were not different between groups across exercise intensities. However, although FBF was not different between groups at the lowest exercise intensity, FBF was significantly lower (20-40%) in individuals with HFpEF at the two higher exercise intensities (30% MVC: 229 ± 8 versus 274 ± 23 ml/min; 45% MVC: 283 ± 17 versus 399 ± 34 ml/min, HFpEF versus HTN). FVC was not different between groups at 15 and 30% MVC but was ∼20% lower in HFpEF at the highest exercise intensity. Brachial artery diameter increased across exercise intensities in both HFpEF and HTN, with no difference between groups. These findings demonstrate an attenuation in muscle blood flow during exercise in HFpEF in the absence of disease-related changes in central hemodynamics or endothelial function.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The current study identified, for the first time, an attenuation in exercising muscle blood flow during handgrip exercise in individuals with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared with overweight individuals with hypertension, two of the most common comorbidities associated with HFpEF. These decrements in exercise hyperemia cannot be attributed to disease-related changes in central hemodynamics or endothelial function, providing additional evidence for disease-related vascular dysregulation, which may be a predominant contributor to exercise intolerance in individuals with HFpEF.

Impact of acute antioxidant administration on inflammation and vascular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Although it is now well established that heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with marked inflammation and a prooxidant state that is accompanied by vascular dysfunction, whether acute antioxidant (AO) administration can effectively target these disease-related decrements has not been evaluated. Thus, the present study sought to evaluate the efficacy of an acute over-the-counter AO cocktail (600 mg α-lipoic acid, 1,000 mg vitamin C, and 600 IU vitamin E) to mitigate inflammation and oxidative stress, and subsequently improve nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and vascular function, in patients with HFpEF. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and reactive hyperemia (RH) were evaluated to assess conduit vessel and microvascular function, respectively, 90 min after administration of either placebo (PL) or AO in 16 patients with HFpEF (73 ± 10 yr, EF 54-70%) using a double-blind, crossover design. Circulating biomarkers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, CRP), oxidative stress (malondialdehyde and protein carbonyl), free radical concentration (EPR spectroscopy), antioxidant capacity, ascorbate and NO bioavailability (plasma nitrate, [Formula: see text], and nitrite, [Formula: see text]) were also assessed. FMD improved following AO administration (PL: 3.49 ± 0.7%, AO: 5.83 ± 1.0%), whereas RH responses were similar between conditions (PL: 428 ± 51 mL, AO: 425 ± 51 mL). AO administration decreased CRP (PL: 4,429 ± 705 ng/mL, AO: 3,664 ± 520 ng/mL) and increased ascorbate (PL: 30.0 ± 2.9 µg/mL, AO: 45.1 ± 3.7 µg/mL) and [Formula: see text] (PL: 182 ± 21 nM, AO: 213 ± 24 nM) but did not affect other biomarkers. Together, these data suggest that acute AO administration can exert anti-inflammatory effects and improve conduit artery vasodilation, but not microvascular function, in patients with HFpEF.