A prospective evaluation of the feasibility of primary screening with unsedated colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is the most effective screening tool for colorectal cancer. In Taiwan, colonoscopy is used much less than sigmoidoscopy for screening because sedation significantly increases the cost and is not readily available, and unsedated colonoscopy is considered to be poorly tolerated. However, unsedated colonoscopy has been shown to be well accepted and may improve the cost-effectiveness and access to colonoscopic screening. OBJECTIVES: To compare the feasibility of unsedated colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy for primary screening and to analyze factors associated with acceptance of the procedures and need for sedation. DESIGN: Single center, prospective. SETTING: National Taiwan University Medical Center. POPULATION AND INTERVENTIONS: A consecutive series of 261 subjects without history of colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy who underwent unsedated colonoscopy (n = 176) or sigmoidoscopy (n = 85) for primary screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Pain scores, acceptance, and need for sedation. RESULTS: No significant differences in pain, acceptance, and need for sedation were found between the colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy groups. Only 9.6% in the colonoscopy group and 10.1% in the sigmoidoscopy group considered sedation necessary. Multivariate analyses revealed that the examinee's sex and the endoscopist, but not the type of endoscopic examination, were associated with the severity of pain and need for sedation. LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized study design. CONCLUSIONS: Unsedated colonoscopy for primary screening is well accepted in nine tenths of examinees who accept this option and is similar to sigmoidoscopy in pain, acceptance, and need for sedation. Primary screening with unsedated colonoscopy is feasible, as with sigmoidoscopy.

Brain damage by mild metabolic derangements in methylmalonic acidemia.

Methylmalonic acidemia caused by an l-methylmalonyl-CoA mutase deficiency. The mut(0) type is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, but tandem mass spectrometry has made early detection possible. Five patients were identified through newborn screening for elevated propionylcarnitine (C3-carnitine) levels. These patients received a positive screening result at a median age of 10 days (range, 5-18 days). When treated at a median age of 11 days (range, 3-50 days), 2 patients were asymptomatic, and only one was significantly acidotic (pH <7.2), but all had various degrees of hyperammonemia (range, 127-1,244 mumol/L). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was performed in 4 patients shortly after diagnosis, and the results were all abnormal. Four patients were followed. There was no further metabolic decompensation after the initial episodes, but their mean developmental quotient was only 50. These results suggest that early hyperammonemia can lead to significant brain damage in methylmalonic acidemia. Therefore, treatment of this disease in newborns must be more aggressive.

Serum interleukin-6 level but not genotype predicts survival after resection in stages II and III gastric carcinoma.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested that interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a prognostic indicator for survival in patients with gastric carcinoma, but this has not been proved using survival analysis. In Asians, the -634G allele is associated with increased IL-6 production. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between serum IL-6 levels, -634G/C polymorphism, and overall survival after resection for gastric carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 155 consecutive patients with gastric carcinoma were evaluated. Serum IL-6 levels were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. Genotype was determined by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism. Serum levels and survival were correlated with genotype and clinicopathologic factors. RESULTS: Age and stage, but not -634G/C genotype, were associated with serum IL-6 levels. The median survival for patients with stage II or stage III gastric carcinoma was 1,418 days in patients with low (< or =13 pg/mL) versus 618 days in patients with high (>13 pg/mL) serum IL-6 levels (P = 0.038). Results of a multivariate analysis showed that serum IL-6 level of >13 pg/mL was a significant predictor of poor survival (hazard ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.92; P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Serum IL-6 level of >13 pg/mL correlates with tumor progression and is an independent predictor of poor survival after resection. In patients with stage II and III gastric carcinoma, serum IL-6 level is more effective than stage as a prognostic indicator. By measuring IL-6, these patients can be divided into two groups with significant differences in survival. The -634G/C polymorphism is not associated with serum IL-6 level or survival.