Predictors and consequences of hemodynamic instability after carotid artery stenting.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors and consequences of hemodynamic instability (HI) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: The records of all patients undergoing CAS in a single institution were reviewed. Patient demographics and risk factors were recorded. Indications for CAS, medications including statins, atropine, and beta blockers, anatomic risk factors, balloon and stent length and diameter, and degree of stenosis were noted. The presence of periprocedural hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] >160), hypotension (SBP <90), and bradycardia (heart rate <60) lasting longer than 1 hr was documented, as was more transient HI. Rates of transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death within 30 days of the procedure were calculated. Chi-squared analysis was used to determine the role of periprocedural factors in predicting the risk of HI and to determine if patients experiencing HI were more likely to experience major adverse events (MAEs) than those who did not. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2012, 199 CAS were performed in 191 patients. One hundred seventeen were men and 74 were women. Their ages ranged from 46 to 92 years (mean, 73.6 years). Eighty-seven percent had hypertension, 48.5% were smokers, 48% had coronary disease, and 38% were diabetic. CAS was performed for asymptomatic stenosis in 55% of patients, 24% had previous TIA, and 20% previous stroke. Sixty-three percent of patients were on statins, 41.4% on beta blockers, and 92% received atropine before balloon dilatation or stent placement. Overall, 130 (65.3%) patients experienced HI and 67 patients (33.7%) experienced HI lasting longer than 1 hr. Octogenarians were more likely to experience both transient and prolonged HI, whereas angina or contralateral occlusion was predictive of any HI, and female sex was predictive of prolonged HI. Transient HI was not predictive of MAE. Patients with HI persisting longer than 1 hr were more likely to experience a TIA than those who did not (P = 0.045), but they were no more likely to experience stroke, MI, or death (P > 0.35 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Periprocedural HI occurs frequently during CAS even with prophylactic atropine administration. Although patients experiencing HI were more likely to experience a TIA, its presence is not associated with an increase in stroke, MI, or death.

Patients at elevated risk of major adverse events following endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is the subject of much debate. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2012 was queried. Patients undergoing CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis were identified. Preoperative risk factors and patient demographics were compared using chi-square analysis and logistic regression to determine their relation with stroke and death. RESULTS: During an 8-year period, 24,211 CEAs performed for asymptomatic carotid stenosis were identified. Patients with dependent functional status (12.5%), recent myocardial infarction (6.3%), chronic heart failure (5.0%), hypoalbuminemia (4.8%), angina (4.1%), dialysis dependence (3.4%), steroid dependence (3.4%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3.3%), and American Society of Anesthesiologists > 3 (3.2%) had a clinically significant increase in risk of stroke and death. Patients with none of the above risk factors had a stroke and death rate of 1.08%, which was significantly less than the overall stroke and death rate (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A high-risk subset of patients undergoing CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis can be identified. If patient selection is optimized and perioperative morbidity and mortality are minimized, CEA will continue to play an important role in stroke prevention for those with significant asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Agreement among observers in the assignment of TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus classification and runoff score.

OBJECTIVE: Productive communication among clinical practitioners is essential if recommendations regarding practice are to exist. The durability of vascular procedures is often influenced by factors such as lesion classification and runoff quality. It is the purpose of this article to determine how reproducible these measures are in the hands of various specialists who deal extensively with peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: The peripheral arteriograms of 100 patients undergoing percutaneous intervention were distributed to six specialists (three vascular surgeons, two interventional radiologists, and one interventional cardiologist). Each was provided with the reference document describing TASC II classification, Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) runoff score, and simplified runoff score. With no further instruction, each individual was asked to assign each angiogram a TASC II class, SVS runoff score, and a simplified runoff score. Comparisons between the scores assigned were made using kappa statistic. RESULTS: When using the simplified runoff score for grading peripheral arterial disease, there was excellent correlation among readers (k = 0.81; P = .001), even across different specialties. When using TASC II class to grade lesions, there was a greater degree of variation when compared with the simplified runoff score (k = 0.44; P < .05). Finally, there was poor correlation between readers when using the SVS runoff score (k = 0.10; P < .05) and the modified SVS runoff score (k = 0.26; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Descriptors of clinical disease severity are not universally reproducible. The simplified runoff score is reproducible when interpreted by multiple readers across different specialties and can be used without further modification. The TASC II classification may need minor alterations in description to obtain good correlation among readers. Before the SVS runoff score can be universally adapted, it will need to be described in much better detail or significantly modified.