The strategy of diminishing age gap effect on different donor-recipient combinations in living donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The disparity between kidney donation and the number of uremic patients on the waiting list has increased the demand for older live-donor kidneys (OLK). However, the donor-recipient age gap may have an impact on the recipient's outcome. METHODS: Patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation at our institute between 2005 and 2019 were enrolled and categorized into four donor-recipient groups according to age (≥50 years and <50 years). The Estimated Post-Transplant Survival (EPTS) score was used to quantify the recipient's condition. Adjusted models analyzed recipient outcomes and related risks among the four groups. RESULTS: Of the 154 pairs of live donors and recipients, OLK did not influence overall or death-censored graft survival. The four donor-recipient combinations had similar recipient outcomes, except it slightly worsened in the "old donor to young recipient" group. The EPTS score (adjusted HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; p = 0.014) and rejection (adjusted HR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.36-13.37; p = 0.013) were significant risk factors for overall and death-censored graft survival, respectively. Recipients with pretransplant diabetes or prior solid organ transplantation could have amplified risk effects. The main causes of graft loss were death in older recipients and chronic rejection in younger recipients. CONCLUSION: OLK is safe for young recipients. Nevertheless, adequate immunosuppression should be maintained to prevent rejection and subsequent graft loss, especially for those receiving second kidney transplantation. In contrast, older recipients should avoid overt immunosuppression and control their comorbidities, such as diabetes-related complications to improve their long-term outcomes.

Outcomes of kidney transplant tourism and risk factors for de novo urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To date, the outcomes of transplant tourism have not been reported extensively. In addition, data about the accuracy of urine cytology for the detection and the role of the BK virus (BKV) in the carcinogenesis of urothelial carcinoma (UC) after renal transplantation are lacking. METHODS: Three hundred seven patients who received deceased donor kidney transplants between January 2003 and December 2009 were retrospectively studied. The clinical parameters and outcomes between the domestic and tourist groups were compared. We also investigated the risk factors and role of BKV in the carcinogenesis of de novo UC by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The subjects in the tourist group were older at transplantation and had a shorter dialysis time before transplantation. There were significantly higher incidence rates of BKV viruria, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, and malignancy in the tourist group. Graft and patient survival were superior in the domestic group. A total of 43 cancers were identified, and the most common type of malignancy was UC (23 patients, 53.5%). The tourist group had a significantly higher incidence of tumors. The sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology for detecting UC were 73.9% and 94.7%, respectively. Independent predictors of UC included female sex, use of Chinese herbal medicine, and transplant tourism. Only two patients (8.7%) with UC had detectable BKV. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant tourism was a risk factor for infection and de novo malignancy. Urothelial carcinoma was the most common malignancy after kidney transplantation. Regular screening for the early detection of UC by urine cytology or periodic sonographic surveys is mandatory, especially for those at high risk.

Risk factors associated with elevated serum pancreatic amylase levels during hemodialysis.

Elevated levels of serum pancreatic enzymes are frequently observed in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The complex hemodynamic, biochemical, and physiological alterations in uremia were speculated to cause excessive release of pancreatic enzymes beyond decreased renal clearance. However, hemodynamic factors are seldom explored in this aspect. We performed the study to evaluate the association between intradialytic hemodynamic change and elevated serum pancreatic amylase (SPA). Eighty-three prevalent HD patients without any clinical evidence of acute pancreatitis underwent pre-HD and post-HD blood sampling for serum pancreatic enzyme levels. Demographic, biochemical, and hematological data were collected from patient record review. Hemodialysis information including intradialytic blood pressure changes and ultrafiltration (UF) amount were collected and averaged for 1 month before the blood sampling day. Patients with elevated SPA during the HD session had greater mean systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure reduction, greater UF volume, greater pre-HD blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine, higher serum phosphorus, lower pre-HD serum total CO2, and lower left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). Using multivariate linear and logistic regression analysis, the independent predictors of elevated SPA were determined to be mean arterial pressure reduction during HD, mean UF amount, pre-HD serum total CO2, and LVEF. Greater blood pressure reduction during HD, greater UF volume, lower pre-HD serum total CO2, and lower LVEF were significantly associated with elevated SPA during HD. This suggests that hemodynamic factors contribute to elevated serum pancreatic enzymes in HD patients.