Impact of national Human Development Index on liver cancer outcomes: Transition from 2008 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: Liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Socioeconomic development, indicated by the Human Development Index (HDI), is closely interconnected with public health. But the manner in which social development and medical advances influenced liver cancer patients in the past decade is still unknown. AIM: To investigate the influence of HDI on clinical outcomes for patients with existing liver cancer from 2008 to 2018. METHODS: The HDI values were obtained from the United Nations Development Programme, the age-standardized incidence and mortality rates of liver cancer were obtained from the GLOBOCAN database to calculate the mortality-to-incidence ratio, and the estimated 5-year net survival of patients with liver cancer was provided by the CONCORD-3 program. We then explored the association of mortality-to-incidence ratio and survival with HDI, with a focus on geographic variability across countries as well as temporal heterogeneity over the past decade. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2018, the epidemiology of liver cancer had changed across countries. Liver cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios were negatively correlated and showed good fit with a modified "dose-to-inhibition response" pattern with HDI (r = -0.548, P < 0.0001 for 2018; r = -0.617, P < 0.0001 for 2008). Cancer survival was positively associated with HDI (r = 0.408, P < 0.01) and negatively associated with mortality-to-incidence ratio (r = -0.346, P < 0.05), solidly confirming the interrelation among liver cancer outcome indicators and socioeconomic factors. Notably, in the past decade, the HDI values in most countries have increased alongside a decreasing tendency of liver cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios (P < 0.0001), and survival outcomes have simultaneously improved (P < 0.001), with significant disparities across countries. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic factors have a significant influence on cancer outcomes. HDI values have increased along with improved cancer outcomes, with significant disparities among countries.

Combination of transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib improves outcomes of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma are controversial in some studies. This meta-analysis aims to compare efficacy and safety, as well as regional disparities, between transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib and transarterial chemotherapy alone for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: We systematically searched multiple databases to select eligible studies. Studies comparing transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization alone for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included. RESULTS: Thirteen studies including five randomized clinical trials with 2538 patients (1121 in combination therapy group and 1417 in monotherapy group) were selected. The combination therapy significantly improved time to progression (hazard ratio 0.66; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.89; P = 0.006) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.72; P < 0.001) in Asian region but not in non-Asian countries (overall survival: hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.20; time to progression: hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.60). Additionally, disease control rate also favored combination therapy (hazard ratio 1.30; 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.69; P = 0.05), which simultaneously caused higher incidences of adverse events, including hand-foot skin reaction (relative ratio 7.03; 95% confidence interval 4.77-10.37), hematological events (relative ratio 3.14; 95% confidence interval 0.99-10.01), diarrhea (relative ratio 2.75; 95% confidence interval 1.74-4.35), hypertension (relative ratio 2.58; 95% confidence interval 1.33-4.99), rash (relative ratio 2.87; 95% confidence interval 1.86-4.43) and alopecia (relative ratio 4.88; 95% confidence interval 1.67-14.13). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of transarterial chemoembolizaiton and sorafenib significantly improves outcomes of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma compared with transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy, especially in Asian region.