Plasma cell-free DNA 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and whole-genome sequencing signatures for early detection of esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer is a highly incidence and deadly disease with a poor prognosis, especially in developing countries. Owing to the lack of specific symptoms and early diagnostic biomarkers, most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease, leading to a 5-year survival rate of less than 15%. Early (n = 50) and middle-advanced (n = 50) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, as well as 71 healthy individuals, underwent 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) sequencing on their plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). A Northern Chinese cohort of cfDNA 5hmC dataset of 150 ESCC patients and 183 healthy individuals were downloaded for validation. A diagnostic model was developed using cfDNA 5hmC signatures and then improved by low-pass whole genome sequencing (WGS) features of cfDNA. Conserved cfDNA 5hmC modification motifs were observed in the two independent ESCC cohorts. The diagnostic model with 5hmC features achieved an AUC of 0.810 and 0.862 in the Southern and Northern cohorts, respectively, with sensitivities of 69.3-74.3% and specificities of 82.4-90.7%. The performance was well maintained in Stage I to Stage IV, with accuracy of 70-100%, but low in Stage 0, 33.3%. Low-pass WGS of cfDNA improved the AUC to 0.934 with a sensitivity of 82.4%, a specificity of 88.2%, and an accuracy of 84.3%, particularly significantly in Stage 0, with an accuracy up to 80%. 5hmC and WGS could efficiently differentiate very early ESCC from healthy individuals. These findings imply a non-invasive and convenient method for ESCC detection when clinical treatments are available and may eventually prolong survival.

Ideal Anatomical Landmark Points for Thoracic Esophagus Segmentation in the Chinese Population.

Introduction: The standards of esophagus segmentation remain different between the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) guideline and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guideline. This study aimed to present variations in the location of intrathoracic esophageal adjacent anatomical landmarks (EAALs) and determine an appropriate method for segmenting the thoracic esophagus based on the relatively fixed EAALs. Patients and Methods: The distances from the upper incisors to the upper border of the esophageal hiatus, lower border of the inferior pulmonary vein (LPV), tracheal bifurcation, lower border of the azygous vein (LAV), and thoracic inlet were measured in the patients undergoing thoracic surgery. The median distances between the EAALs and the specified starting points, as well as reference value ranges and ratios, were obtained. The variation coefficients of distances and ratios from certain starting points to different EAALs were calculated and compared to determine the relatively fixed landmarks. Results: This study included 305 patients. The average distance from the upper incisors to the upper border of the cardia, the midpoint between the tracheal bifurcation and esophageal hiatus (MTBEH), LPV, LAV, tracheal bifurcation, and thoracic inlet were 41.6, 35.3, 34.8, 29.4, 29.5, and 20.3 cm, respectively. The distances from the upper incisors or thoracic inlet to any intrathoracic EAALs in men were higher than in women. In addition, the height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were correlated with the distances. The ratio of the distance between the upper incisors and tracheal bifurcation to the distance between the upper incisors and upper border of the cardia and the ratio of the distance between the thoracic inlet and tracheal bifurcation to the distance between the thoracic inlet and upper border of the cardia possessed relatively smaller coefficients of variation. Conclusion: The distances from the EAALs to the upper incisors vary with height, weight, BMI, and gender. Compared with distance, the ratios are more suitable for esophagus segmentation. Tracheal bifurcation and MTBEH are ideal EAALs for thoracic esophagus segmentation, and this is consistent with the JES guideline recommendation.