Retreatment for Local Recurrence of Prostatic Carcinoma After Prior Therapeutic Irradiation: Efficacy and Toxicity of HDR-Like SBRT.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the use of high dose-rate-like stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) retreatment for biopsy-proven local persistence in prostate postradiation therapy, evaluating efficacy and toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2009 to 2018, 50 patients with biopsy-proven recurrent prostate cancer >2 years after prior treatment were retreated with a high dose-rate-like dose of 3400 cGy over 5 fractions. Previous radiation therapy dose measured 75.6 Gy (64.8-81.0) and median salvage interval was 8.1 years (32-241 mo.). Eighty-three percent of patients had Gleason score 7 or higher disease at retreatment. Those with preexisting toxicity >grade 1 from their prior course were excluded. The planning target volume was comprised of the clinical target volume (prostate + any contiguous extension only) with no additional expansion. Toxicity assessment used CTCAE v.3.0 criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 44 months (3-110). Median pre-SBRT salvage baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 3.97 ng/mL decreased to 0.6 ng/mL and 0.16 ng/mL at 1 and 5 years in nonrelapsed patients, respectively. Actuarial 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (DFS) measured 60%, with corresponding 5-year actuarial local, distant, and salvage androgen deprivation therapy free rates of 94%, 89%, and 69%, respectively. Actuarial 5-year biochemical DFS measured 78% if PSA at salvage was <6.92 ng/mL versus 12% with ≥6.92 ng/mL (P = .0001). Toxicity was primarily in the GU domain, with an 8% 5-year actuarial rate of grade 3+, 3% when limited to salvage of "conventional external beam only" local relapse. No gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity >grade 1 occurred. Of the 30% sexually potent at the time of salvage, 82% subsequently lost potency. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT salvage of local prostate recurrence in previously irradiated patients appears clinically feasible in this challenging group. It demonstrates favorable PSA and DFS response, typically deferring the need for salvage androgen deprivation therapy or other treatment by over 5 years, with low GU and GI toxicity.

High-dose-rate stereotactic body radiation therapy for postradiation therapy locally recurrent prostatic carcinoma: Preliminary prostate-specific antigen response, disease-free survival, and toxicity assessment.

PURPOSE: Patients with locally recurrent adenocarcinoma of the prostate following radiation therapy (RT) present a challenging problem. We prospectively evaluated the use of "high-dose-rate-like" prostate stereotactic body RT (SBRT) salvage for this circumstance, evaluating prostate-specific antigen response, disease-free survival, and toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 2009 and March 2014, 29 patients with biopsy-proven recurrent locally prostate cancer >2 years post-RT were treated. Median prior RT dose was 73.8 Gy and median interval to SBRT salvage was 88 months. Median recurrence Gleason score was 7 (79% was ≥7). Pre-existing RT toxicity >grade 1 was a reason for exclusion. Magnetic resonance imaging-defined prostate volume including any suspected extraprostatic extension, comprising the planning target volume. A total of 34 Gy/5 fractions was given, delivering a heterogeneous, high-dose-rate-like dose-escalation pattern. Toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-nine treated patients had a median 24-month follow-up (range, 3-60 months). A median pre-SBRT salvage baseline prostate-specific antigen level of 3.1 ng/mL decreased to 0.65 ng/mL and 0.16 ng/mL at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Actuarial 2-year biochemical disease-free survival measured 82%, with no local failures. Toxicity >grade 1 was limited to the genitourinary domain, with 18% grade 2 or higher and 7% grade 3 or higher. No gastrointestinal toxicity >grade 1 occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Two-year disease-free survival is encouraging, and the prostate-specific antigen response kinetic appears comparable with that seen in de novo patients treated with SBRT, albeit still a preliminary finding. Grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicity was occasionally seen with no obvious predictive factor. Noting that our only brachytherapy case was 1 of the 2 cases with ≥grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, caution is recommended treating these patients. SBRT salvage of post-RT local recurrence appears clinically feasible, with longer term evaluation required to assess ultimate efficacy and late toxicity rates.

Preoperative simultaneous fractionated cisplatin and radiation therapy in the treatment of advanced operable stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: In Stage III/IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, multidisciplinary treatment is not standardized. This study evaluated preoperative simultaneous radiation therapy and Cisplatin 20 mg/M(2)/4 days during weeks 1, 4, and 7 of irradiation (CTRT). METHODS: Records of 143 CTRT and 48 patients treated with other surgery/radiation/chemotherapy regimens (CONTROL) were reviewed. Chi-square, analysis of variance, and Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis were performed. RESULTS: CTRT improved outcomes in Grade 2 to 5 toxicity (76% CONTROL vs 45% CTRT, P < .0001), complete clinical response (68% CTRT vs 36% CONTROL, P < .003), histologic complete response (67% in CTRT vs 28% in CONTROL, P = .0002), recurrence (33% in CTRT vs 66% in CONTROL, P = .0007), and distant metastases (2% CTRT vs 37% CONTROL, P = .0003); Kaplan-Meier disease-free survival was 65% CTRT versus 34% CONTROL. CONCLUSIONS: CTRT increases complete clinical response, histologic complete response, organ preservation, and survival, with lower recurrence and reduced toxicity and rare recurrence. CTRT may be the first treatment for Stage III/IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Postsurgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer with electronic brachytherapy: outcomes and health-related quality of life at 1 year.

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter registry followed up patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and electronic brachytherapy (EBT). This report provides 1- and 2-year updates to the initial publication. METHODS: Patients were of age 50 years or more with invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ, tumor size ≤3 cm, and negative surgical margins. After lumpectomy, patients received EBT in 10 fractions over 5 days (34 Gy total). RESULTS: Of the 69 patients enrolled, 62 were evaluated at 1 year and 20 patients at 2 years after treatment. At 1 year, 28 (45.2%) patients reported adverse events that were possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment. Most (90%) were grade 1: manageable and typical of radiation therapy. Four events were grade 2: induration/firmness (2), field contracture (1), and seroma (1). One event was grade 3: a draining fistula at the lumpectomy site due to residual effects of a breast infection at 1 month. No recurrences have been reported. Cosmetic ratings were excellent or good in 93.4% of patients at 1 year. Most patients (69%) were energetic most or all of the time. Most patients (69% to 98%) were not affected by individual symptoms of breast disease at 1 year. Generally patients who had an adverse event did not report the corresponding symptom on the quality-of-life questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This registry followed up patients with early-stage breast cancer at 1 and 2 years after breast-conserving surgery and EBT. No recurrences have been reported, and adverse effects were acceptable.

Electronic brachytherapy as adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated treatment and clinical outcomes of patients with early stage breast cancer who received adjuvant high-dose rate (HDR) electronic brachytherapy (EBT) treatment post-lumpectomy using the Axxent(®) EBT system. Dosimetric data from the EBT treatment plans were compared with those based on iridium-192 HDR brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of 63 patients with early stage breast cancer (Tis, T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2) who were treated post-lumpectomy with EBT alone or in combination with external beam radiation therapy were reviewed. The prescribed EBT dose was 34 Gy (10 fractions over 5 days, 3.4 Gy each) to 1 cm from the balloon surface. Dosimetry data from 12 patients were compared with these of treatment plans using an iridium-192 source prepared for the same 12 patients. RESULTS: The majority of patients (90.5%) were older than 50 years and had one or more risk factors for breast cancer (80.6%). Tumor sizes were 0.1 cm to 3.5 cm (mean 1.3 cm). Median follow-up was 7 months (1 to 18 months) post-EBT. Balloon applicators were implanted 0 to 85 days (mean 13.4 days) post-lumpectomy/re-excision. The most common adverse events were erythema, rash dermatitis, and pain or breast tenderness. No recurrences were reported. Dosimetric analyses demonstrated comparable target coverage, increased high-dose regions, and a significantly reduced dose to the ipsilateral breast and lungs as well as the heart with EBT as compared with the iridium-192 treatment plans. CONCLUSION: This retrospective, multicenter study showed that postsurgical adjuvant radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer can be administered using the EBT system with similar toxicity outcomes to those reported with iridium-192 brachytherapy. EBT offers a convenient, portable, nonisotope alternative to HDR brachytherapy using iridium-192.

Post-surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer with electronic brachytherapy: an intersociety, multicenter brachytherapy trial.

INTRODUCTION: Electronic brachytherapy (EBT) was developed to allow accelerated partial breast irradiation to be performed in a patient procedure room with minimal shielding. This observational, nonrandomized, multicenter study evaluated EBT as a post-surgical adjuvant radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer. METHODS: This study included women aged 50 years or more with invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ, tumor size ≤3 cm, negative lymph node status, and negative surgical margins. The endpoints were skin and subcutaneous toxicities, efficacy outcomes, cosmetic outcomes, and device performance. In this interim report, 1-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up data are available on 68, 59, and 37 patients, respectively. RESULTS: The EBT device performed consistently, delivering the prescribed 34 Gy to all 69 patients (10 fractions/patient). Most adverse events were Grade 1 and included firmness, erythema, breast tenderness, hyperpigmentation, pruritis, field contracture, seroma, rash/desquamation, palpable mass, breast edema, hypopigmentation, telangiectasia, and blistering, which were anticipated. Breast infection occurred in two (2.9%) patients. No tumor recurrences were reported. Cosmetic outcomes were excellent or good in 83.9%-100% of evaluable patients at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year. CONCLUSION: This observational, nonrandomized, multicenter study demonstrates that this EBT device was reliable and well tolerated as an adjuvant radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer.

Use of electronic brachytherapy to deliver postsurgical adjuvant radiation therapy for endometrial cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective, multicenter study evaluated the feasibility and safety of high-dose rate electronic brachytherapy (EBT) as a postsurgical adjuvant radiation therapy for endometrial cancer. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed from 41 patients (age 40-89 years) with endometrial cancer (Federation of International Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IA-IIIC) treated at nine centers between April 2008 and October 2009. Treatment included intracavitary vaginal EBT alone (n = l6) at doses of 18.0-24.0 Gy in 3-4 fractions and EBT in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT, n = 25) at a total radiation dose range of 40.0-80.4 Gy. Doses were prescribed to a depth of 5 mm from the applicator surface and to the upper third (n = 15) and the upper half (n = 26) of the vagina. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.8 (range 0.5-12.0) months. All 41 patients received the intended dose of radiation as prescribed. Adverse events occurred in 13 of 41 patients and were mild to moderate (Grade 1-2), consisting primarily of vaginal mucositis, rectal mucosal irritation and discomfort, and temporary dysuria and diarrhea. There were no Grade 3 adverse events in the EBT-only treatment group. One patient, who was being treated with the combination of EBT and EBRT for recurrent endometrial cancer, had a Grade 3 adverse event. No recurrences have been reported to date. CONCLUSION: Electronic brachytherapy provides a feasible treatment option for postoperative adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy as sole radiation therapy and in combination with EBRT for primary endometrial cancer. Early and late toxicities were mild to moderate.