A virtual dissemination framework to inform and evaluate a neonatal project ECHO (NeoECHO).

AIM: To present the development, implementation and evaluation of a theoretically grounded novel virtual dissemination evaluation (VDE) framework. BACKGROUND: Care of intensive care unit patients requires access to the most up-to-date knowledge and best practices. To address this challenge, we present the development, implementation and evaluation of a theoretically grounded novel VDE framework. This framework is applied to a dissemination strategy, NeoECHO, in neonatal intensive care units. Evidence-based virtual education is implemented to prevent, detect and treat necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates. DESIGN: Research Methodology: Discussion Paper-Methodology. METHODS: The virtual dissemination evaluation framework is a sequential combination of Integration of Integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services and Moore's Expanded Outcomes frameworks. The framework's conceptual determinants, virtual facilitators and implementation evaluations were operationalized in the NeoECHO dissemination strategy and evaluated for feasibility. The virtual dissemination evaluation framework was conceptually mapped, and operational activities were examined including theoretical constructs drawing on insights of nursing theorists, especially Fawcett's criteria (2005) for frameworks with practical application (significance, internal consistency, parsimony, testability and design fit). The NeoECHO strategy was evaluated for virtual dissemination evaluation adherence, operationalization and feasibility of implementation evaluation. RESULTS: The virtual dissemination evaluation framework meets the criteria for a practical application and demonstrates feasibility for adherence and operationalization consistency. The implementation evaluation was usable in the virtual dissemination of best practices for neonatal care for necrotizing enterocolitis and healthcare providers were actively engaged in using NeoECHO as an implementation strategy. CONCLUSION: This examination of the foundational aspects of the framework underscores the rigour required for generalization of practical application. Effective virtual dissemination of evidence-based practices to hospital units requires structured delivery and evaluation, enabling engaged healthcare providers to actualize education rapidly. The virtual dissemination evaluation frameworks' potential for narrowing the evidence-based practice gap in neonatal care showcases its wider significance and applicability. IMPLICATIONS: Care of neonates in NICUs requires a multidisciplinary approach and necessitates access to the most up-to-date knowledge and best practices. More than traditional dissemination methods are required to bridge the implementation gap. IMPACT: The effective use of the VDE framework can enhance the design, implementation and evaluation of knowledge dissemination, ultimately elevating neonatal care quality. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This paper introduces the VDE framework, a sequential combination of the iPARIHS and Moore's EO frameworks-as a methodological tool for designing, implementing and evaluating a neonatal strategy (NeoECHO) for virtual dissemination of education in NICUs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Neonatal Intensive Care Workflow Analysis Informing NEC-Zero Clinical Decision Support Design.

Decision support in neonatal ICUs is needed, especially for prevention and risk awareness of the devastating complication of necrotizing enterocolitis, a major cause of emergency surgery among fragile infants. The purpose of this study was to describe the current clinical workflow and sociotechnical processes among clinicians for necrotizing enterocolitis risk awareness, timely recognition of symptoms, and treatment to inform decision support design. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Focus groups were held in two neonatal ICUs (five groups in Unit A and six in Unit B). Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis and compared with field notes. Clinicians (N = 27) included nurses (37%), physicians (30%), neonatal nurse practitioners (19%), and other staff (16%). Workflow processes differed for nurses (who see necrotizing enterocolitis signs and notify providers to order diagnostic tests and treatments) and providers (who receive notification of necrotizing enterocolitis concern and then decide how to act). Clinicians desired (1) a necrotizing enterocolitis-relevant dashboard to support nutrition tracking and necrotizing enterocolitis recognition; (2) features to support decision-making (eg, necrotizing enterocolitis risk and adherence scoring); (3) breast milk tracking and feeding clinical decision support; (4) tools for necrotizing enterocolitis surveillance and quality reporting; and (5) general EHR optimizations to improve user experience.

Engaging Parents of Fragile Infants in the Design and Appraisal of Health Literature: An Español Toolkit for Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

WHAT WAS OBSERVED OR INVESTIGATED: The increased morbidity of diverse infants is unacceptable, and methods to reduce necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in their communities are needed. This article discusses the importance of the Español toolkit; provides a backstory of how the Español toolkit came about and how it was verified and validated; and concludes with impressions from involving parents in the research process. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: After research evidence was translated from English into Spanish, a cross-sectional exploratory, descriptive, mixed-methods study was conducted, guided by the knowledge translation into practice (Translating Research Into Practice [TRIP]) framework. Twenty bilingual English-Spanish parents of fragile infants evaluated the NEC-Zero Español toolkit from a single neonatal intensive care unit. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The NEC-Zero Español toolkit was found to be easy-to-use and useful and provided information that can be used to augment information sharing. Having access to health information offers a meaningful way to start a conversation and may even impact positive behaviors such as breastfeeding promotion. To lessen Spanish speakers' linguistic barriers, providing materials in Spanish can help meet their information needs and initiate conversations with healthcare providers. This is particularly important because Hispanic infants are at high risk for NEC.

Exploring Internal Facilitators' Experience With NeoECHO to Foster NEC Prevention and Timely Recognition Through the iPARIHS Lens.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains a major complication in the neonatal population. Standard practices regarding the care of premature infants and attitudes toward NEC prevention strategies vary across neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Evidence-based best practice dissemination was presented through the NEC-Zero bundle. To close gaps between evidence and practice, a telehealth-delivered intervention (ie, NeoECHO) was provided to NICUs. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to enable adoption of best practice for NEC prevention using NeoECHO through describing the local volunteer unit leaders', or internal facilitators' (IFs'), experiences in participating in NeoECHO and identifying the extent to which the facilitation activities within the NeoECHO experience were consistent with constructs from the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (iPARHIS) framework. METHODS: The design of this study was qualitative descriptive. Six IFs were recruited in the Southwest. After 6 NeoECHO sessions, individual interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was applied. Codes were informed by the iPARIHS framework. RESULTS: Major themes were (1) Innovation: Quality Improvement Projects, Bundles of Care, and Huddle; (2) Recipient: Reluctant Stakeholders and Technical Modalities; (3) Context: Buy-In, Timing, Resources, Leadership, and Blame; (4) Facilitation: Betterment, Buddy System, Passionate Care, and Empowerment; and (5) Adoption: Continuous Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Honest Discussions. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: NeoECHO fostered a learning community to share current practices, policies, and strategies for NEC prevention, but the IFs were essential to foster local participation. The long-term impacts of NeoECHO are the focus of current research.Video Abstract available athttps://journals.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/Pages/videogallery.aspx.

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Neonatal Project ECHO (NeoECHO) as a Dissemination and Implementation Strategy to Prevent Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

BACKGROUND: Caregivers in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) often determine care practices in silos, although access to learning communities can improve quality. Project ECHO, a telehealth-delivered mentoring intervention, provides specialists' expertise but not in the NICU until now. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) prevention and timely recognition is one area where specialist support and engaging with a learning community could improve outcomes. NEC-Zero is one care bundle that aims to improve care quality by providing tools to implement NEC prevention in family-engaged ways. AIMS: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of NeoECHO to disseminate NEC-Zero education and describe the intentions of internal facilitators (IFs) and clinicians to initiate quality improvement changes. METHODS: This was a convergent mixed-methods study. Our team delivered the first neonatal adaptation of Project ECHO called "NeoECHO" to leverage facilitation as an implementation strategy to disseminate NEC-Zero evidence and support practice change. RESULTS: Six IFs and seven NICUs participated. All units and IFs that began the series finished it. Of the 261 session attendees, 206 (79%) study evaluations were completed. Of those who completed evaluations, 89 (100%) completed at least one session and 29 (33%) completed three or more. Satisfaction was high. Participants appreciated the engaged and accessible format to learn from experts using real case examples and didactic sessions. Individuals and IFs reported intentions to adopt evidence based on NeoECHO. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: NeoECHO was an acceptable and feasible way to engage under-resourced NICUs and share NEC-Zero evidence and tools. More research is needed to examine the impact of NeoECHO on care processes and patient outcomes.

Development of the NEC-Zero Toolkit: Supporting Reliable Implementation of Necrotizing Enterocolitis Prevention and Recognition.

The goal of the NEC-Zero project is to reduce the burden of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) by increasing access to evidence-based tools to help clinicians and parents integrate evidence into daily care. It involves (a) human milk feeding with prioritized mother's own milk; (b) use of a unit-adopted standardized feeding protocol; (c) a unit-adopted strategy for timely recognition that integrates risk awareness and a structured communication tool when symptoms develop; and (d) stewardship of empiric antibiotics and avoidance of antacids. A toolkit for caregivers and parents was developed to make implementation consistent. For clinicians the toolkit includes: the GutCheckNEC risk score, a structured communication tool, the "Avoiding NEC" checklist, and the NEC-Zero website. For parents, NEC-Zero tools include the website, three educational brochures in English and Spanish, and a collaborative care video produced with the NEC Society. This article describes the toolkit and how it has been accessed and used.

"Tipping point" concept analysis in the family caregiving context.

AIM: Analyze the concept "tipping point" in the older adult family caregiving context to further knowledge about caregiving families, enhancing transdisciplinary theory, research, and practice. BACKGROUND: While used commonly in some disciplines, how "tipping point" has been used in health care, generally, and in relation to caregiving families, specifically, is less clear. This project was conducted to offer conceptual clarity to tipping point. DESIGN: Walker and Avant's framework. DATA SOURCE: Searches of scholarly literature in PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed using the search term "tipping point" in either title or abstract. REVIEW METHODS: Definitions used were extracted; instances when the concept was implied but the actual term "tipping point" was not used and contexts where the term was used or implied were identified. RESULTS: The composite definition of a caregiving tipping point is a seemingly abrupt, severe, and absolute change event involving either the older adult or caregiver(s), or both that indicates a breakdown in the status quo of the caregiving system. CONCLUSIONS: Transdisciplinary research, care, and policy should treat caregiving families as complex systems, use longitudinal assessments, and include colloquial communication. Early detection of impending tipping points will provide family-centered decisional support and enhance families' quality of life and safety.

Expert consensus to weight an adherence score for audit and feedback of practices that prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants.

OBJECTIVE: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a catastrophic abdominal complication threatening the life of premature infants, but adoption of prevention and early recognition practices differs as do NEC rates in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs). The purpose of this research was to validate and weight an evidence-based adherence score (aka NEC-Zero Adherence Score) to prevent and foster timely recognition of NEC. STUDY DESIGN: An electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) approach was used to identify consensus. NEC experts were recruited via the NEC Society and surveyed until consensus and stability criteria for the Delphi were met (≥70% consensus and mean responses changed <15% between rounds). RESULTS: Expert panelists (n=22) were experienced (M=17.6, SD 11years) and predominately physicians (68%) or neonatal nurse practitioners (18%). Consensus (>70% by item) supported a 10 point score. Points were distributed across 1) an exclusive human milk diet (5 points), 2) standardized feeding protocols (3 points), 3) antibiotic stewardship (1 point), and 4) a unit-specified approach to early recognition (1 point). Withholding feeding during transfusion was controversial (M=0.50, SD 0.73) and met consensus criteria to drop from the score. CONCLUSIONS: Holding feeding during transfusion was dropped from the score. Relationships between the score and unit NEC rates as well as its utility for use in audit and feedback should be studied in the future.

NEC-zero recommendations from scoping review of evidence to prevent and foster timely recognition of necrotizing enterocolitis.

BACKGROUND: Although decades have focused on unraveling its etiology, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains a chief threat to the health of premature infants. Both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors contribute to varying rates of disease across neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to present a scoping review with two new meta-analyses, clinical recommendations, and implementation strategies to prevent and foster timely recognition of NEC. METHODS: Using the Translating Research into Practice (TRIP) framework, we conducted a stakeholder-engaged scoping review to classify strength of evidence and form implementation recommendations using GRADE criteria across subgroup areas: 1) promoting human milk, 2) feeding protocols and transfusion, 3) timely recognition strategies, and 4) medication stewardship. Sub-groups answered 5 key questions, reviewed 11 position statements and 71 research reports. Meta-analyses with random effects were conducted on effects of standardized feeding protocols and donor human milk derived fortifiers on NEC. RESULTS: Quality of evidence ranged from very low (timely recognition) to moderate (feeding protocols, prioritize human milk, limiting antibiotics and antacids). Prioritizing human milk, feeding protocols and avoiding antacids were strongly recommended. Weak recommendations (i.e. "probably do it") for limiting antibiotics and use of a standard timely recognition approach are presented. Meta-analysis of data from infants weighing <1250 g fed donor human milk based fortifier had reduced odds of NEC compared to those fed cow's milk based fortifier (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.13, 1.00; p = 0.05; 4 studies, N = 1164). Use of standardized feeding protocols for infants <1500 g reduced odds of NEC by 67% (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.17, 0.65, p = 0.001; 9 studies; N = 4755 infants). Parents recommended that NEC information be shared early in the NICU stay, when feedings were adjusted, or feeding intolerance occurred via print and video materials to supplement verbal instruction. DISCUSSION: Evidence for NEC prevention is of sufficient quality to implement. Implementation that addresses system-level interventions that engage the whole team, including parents, will yield the best impact to prevent NEC and foster its timely recognition.

A 5-year analysis of peer-reviewed journal article publications of pharmacy practice faculty members.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate scholarship, as represented by peer-reviewed journal articles, among US pharmacy practice faculty members; contribute evidence that may better inform benchmarking by academic pharmacy practice departments; and examine factors that may be related to publication rates. METHODS: Journal articles published by all pharmacy practice faculty members between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2010, were identified. College and school publication rates were compared based on public vs. private status, being part of a health science campus, having a graduate program, and having doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) faculty members funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). RESULTS: Pharmacy practice faculty members published 6,101 articles during the 5-year study period, and a pharmacy practice faculty member was the primary author on 2,698 of the articles. Pharmacy practice faculty members published an average of 0.51 articles per year. Pharmacy colleges and schools affiliated with health science campuses, at public institutions, with NIH-funded PharmD faculty members, and with graduate programs had significantly higher total publication rates compared with those that did not have these characteristics (p<0.006). CONCLUSION: Pharmacy practice faculty members contributed nearly 6,000 unique publications over the 5-year period studied. However, this reflects a rate of less than 1 publication per faculty member per year, suggesting that a limited number of faculty members produced the majority of publications.