Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics: An Australian Cost-Benefit Study.

OBJECTIVE: Chest pain is a large health care burden in Australia and around the world. Its management requires specialist assessment and diagnostic tests, which can be costly and often lead to unnecessary hospital admissions. There is a growing unmet clinical need to improve the efficiency and management of chest pain. This study aims to show the cost-benefit of rapid access chest pain clinics (RACC) as an alternative to hospital admission. DESIGN: Retrospective cost-benefit analysis for 12 months. SETTING: RACCs in three Sydney tertiary referral hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost per patient. RESULTS: Hospitals A, B and C implemented RACCs but each operating with slightly different staffing, referral patterns, and diagnostic services. All RACCs had similar costs per patient of AUD$455.25, AUD$427.12 and AUD$474.45, hospitals A, B and C respectively, and similar cost benefits per patient of AUD$1,168.75, AUD$1,196.88 and AUD$1,149.55, respectively. At least 28%, 26% and 29% of these RACC patients for hospitals A, B, and C, respectively, would have otherwise had to have been admitted to hospital for the model to be cost-beneficial. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a RACC model of care is cost-beneficial in the state of NSW as an alternative strategy to inpatient care for managing chest pain. Scaling up to a national level could represent an even larger benefit for the Australian health system.

Rapid Access Cardiology (RAC) Services Within a Large Tertiary Referral Centre-First Year in Review.

BACKGROUND: Rapid Access Cardiology (RAC) services are hospital co-located cardiologist-led outpatient clinics providing prompt assessment and management of chest pain. This service model is part of chest pain management in the United Kingdom. However, little data exists on RAC services in Australia. Our aim was to describe the introduction of RAC services to an Australian tertiary centre (utility, safety, and acceptability). METHODS: Referrals were accepted for low-intermediate risk chest pain. Referrer and patient clinical data was collected prospectively in the first year of RAC - 4 February 2015 to 4 February 2016. Data was linked to hospital presentations/admissions to identify readmissions/mortality data. RESULTS: Among 520 patients (55.0% male, mean age 55.2 years), 87.6% were referred from emergency and 68.4% assessed within 5 days. The final diagnosis was new coronary artery disease (CAD) in 7.9%, and 81.3% had ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, overweight/obesity, smoker, pre-existing CAD, and chronic renal failure). On average, 0.8 cardiac tests were ordered per person. In total, 35 (6.7%) had invasive coronary angiograms, with 51.4% having obstructive CAD. Patients reported in surveys (82.8% response rate) that 93.0% "strongly agreed" RAC services were useful to the community. Referrers were also "very satisfied" with RAC (7/17) or "satisfied" (9/17). Furthermore, of 336 referrals, referrers reported without RAC they would admit the patient in 11.3% of cases. There were 4.8% (25/520) unplanned cardiovascular readmissions and 0.6% (3/520) of these were for acute coronary syndromes and no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient RAC services are an accepted, effective and safe pathway for management of low-intermediate risk chest pain.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion using different technologies in the United Kingdom: A multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at assessing the feasibility and long-term efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in a "real world" setting. BACKGROUND: Although LAAO has recently emerged as an alternative to oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation for the prevention of thromboembolic stroke, "real world" data about the procedure with different devices are lacking. METHODS: Eight centers in the United Kingdom contributed to a retrospective registry for LAAO procedures undertaken between July 2009 and November 2014. RESULTS: A total of 371 patients (72.9 ± 8.3 years old, 88.9% males) were enrolled. The overall procedure success was 92.5%, with major events in 3.5% of cases. The device choice was Watchman in 63% of cases, Amplatzer Cardiac Plug in 34.7%, Lariat in 1.7%, and Coherex WaveCrest in 0.6%. A significant improvement in procedure success (from 89.2% to 95.7%; P = 0.018) and reduction of acute major complications (from 6.5% to 0.5%; P = 0.001) were observed between procedures in the first and the second half of the recruitment time. An annual 90.1% relative risk reduction (RRR) for ischemic stroke, an 87.2% thromboembolic events RRR, and a 92.9% major bleeding RRR were observed, if compared with the predicted annual risks based on CHADS2, CHA2DS2-Vasc, and HAS-BLED scores, respectively, over a follow-up period of 24.7 ± 16.07 months. CONCLUSIONS: LAAO can be performed safely in a real world setting with good implant success rates and procedural outcomes. The long-term benefits of the procedure are reassuring in terms of both ischemic events and avoidance of severe bleeding associated with anticoagulation in this patient group. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Patent foramen ovale closure following cryptogenic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: Long-term follow-up of 301 cases.

Patent foramen ovale has been identified as a conduit for paradoxical embolism resulting in cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We aimed to establish rates of death, recurrent stroke or TIA among patients undergoing PFO closure for stroke or TIA at our unit. A retrospective analysis of all PFO closure patients was performed between May 2004 and January 2013. Follow up was performed by mortality tracing using the Medical Research Information Service of the Office of National Statistics. With regard to stroke or TIA recurrence, written consent forms and questionnaires were mailed with follow up telephone calls. Medical notes and imaging records were consulted where adverse events were noted. 301 patients aged 48.6 ± 11.0 years, 54.4% male, with ≥1 thromboembolic neurovascular event had percutaneous PFO closure with one of eight devices, with successful implantation in 99% of cases. Follow-up duration was 40.2 ± 26.2 months (range 1.3-105.3); complete in 301 patients for mortality (100%) and 283 patients (94.0%) for neurovascular events. Two patients died during follow-up (respiratory failure n = 1; road traffic accident n = 1). Recurrent stroke (MRI or CT confirmed) was observed in five patients (0.5%; 0.55 per 100 person-years) and TIA in 9 (1.1%; 0.98 per 100 person-years). Atrial fibrillation requiring treatment was documented in 14 patients (1.7%). Percutaneous PFO closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA is a safe treatment with a low incidence of procedural complications and recurrent neurovascular events. Registry data like these may help to demonstrate the utility of PFO closure in stroke.

Transradial Secondary Arterial Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Experience and Limitations.

OBJECTIVES: The transradial approach limits vascular complications in coronary interventions. The same may be true for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We present our experience using secondary transradial arterial access. METHODS: Secondary transradial arterial access has been our default strategy for TAVI since 2007. Procedural data is collected prospectively. We assessed procedural success and complications. RESULTS: Data from 282 patients aged 81±5.2 yrs was examined. Secondary arterial access was transradial (74%), femoral (24%) and none (2%). Secondary femoral access was reserved for failed radial access (3%), anatomical anomalies (4%), operator preference (7%), trial requirements (6%) or proctor preference (4%). The principal pathology was aortic stenosis (90.8%), aortic regurgitation (6.7%) or a combination (2.5%). CoreValve (91.4%), Edwards (7%) or Lotus valves (1.7%) were delivered via transfemoral (88.6%), direct aortic (5.3%), subclavian (3.9%) or transapical approaches (1.8%). Significant vascular complications occurred in 25 cases (9.4%), including surgical repair of a failed percutaneous closure device (n=16), ilio-femoral dissection (n=3), iliac perforations (n=3), plaque disruption (n=1) and false aneurysm (n=2), one of which was from the secondary femoral access site. There was no local vascular complication from the secondary radial site. CONCLUSIONS: The transradial secondary access route for TAVI is safe and effective. The transradial route may limit vascular access complications from secondary transfemoral access.

Radiation dose during percutaneous treatment of structural heart disease.

BACKGROUND: With the increased application of structural heart intervention techniques, there is concern over increasing radiation dose, especially during lengthy procedures. METHODS: We compared data from 91 consecutive single-vessel percutaneous coronary interventions, 69 patent foramen ovale closures, 25 atrial septal defect closures, 49 percutaneous transluminal mitral valvuloplasties, 57 balloon aortic valvuloplasties, 53 trans-catheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI), 21 left atrial appendage occlusions and 7 MitraClip procedures. RESULTS: The following fluoroscopy times and dose-area product (median, interquartile range) were recorded: patent foramen ovale closure (7.8, 5.3-10.9 minutes; 16.9, 7.5-30.6 Gycm(2)), atrial septal defect closure (10.1, 7.3-13 minutes; 15.5, 11.6-30.5 Gycm(2)), percutaneous transluminal mitral valvuloplasty (14.3, 11.4-24.2 minutes; 37.4, 19.8-87.0 Gycm(2)), balloon aortic valvuloplasty (8.4, 5.2-13.2 minutes; 19.8, 10.2-30.0 Gycm(2)), Edwards Sapien TAVI (24.0, 19.3-34.4 minutes; 86.4, 64.0-111.4 Gycm(2)), Medtronic CoreValve TAVI (19.4, 15.0-26.0 minutes; 101.9, 52.6-143.2 Gycm(2)), left atrial appendage occlusion (18.5, 15.7-29.1 minutes; 84.1, 36.4-140.0 Gycm(2)), Mitraclip procedures (37.2, 14.2-59.9 minutes; 89.1, 26.2-118.7 Gycm(2)), coronary angiography and single vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (6.6, 5.1-11.0 minutes; 62.5, 37.0-95.8 Gycm(2)). CONCLUSION: For structural heart interventions, dose-area product was not significantly greater than for coronary angiography with single-vessel percutaneous coronary artery intervention. This should be reassuring to patients and staff attending prolonged structural heart interventions.

Percutaneous closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defect: in-hospital outcomes and long-term follow-up of UK experience.

BACKGROUND: Postinfarction ventricular septal defect carries a grim prognosis. Surgical repair offers reasonable outcomes in patients who survive a healing phase. Percutaneous device implantation represents a potentially attractive early alternative. METHODS AND RESULTS: Postinfarction ventricular septal defect closure was attempted in 53 patients from 11 centers (1997-2012; aged 72±11 years; 42% female). Nineteen percent had previous surgical closure. Myocardial infarction was anterior (66%) or inferior (34%). Time from myocardial infarction to closure procedure was 13 (first and third quartiles, 5-54) days. Devices were successfully implanted in 89% of patients. Major immediate complications included procedural death (3.8%) and emergency cardiac surgery (7.5%). Immediate shunt reduction was graded as complete (23%), partial (62%), or none (15%). Median length of stay after the procedure was 5.0 (2.0-9.0) days. Fifty-eight percent survived to discharge and were followed up for 395 (63-1522) days, during which time 4 additional patients died (7.5%). Factors associated with death after postinfarction ventricular septal defect closure included the following: age (hazard ratio [HR]=1.04; P=0.039), female sex (HR=2.33; P=0.043), New York Heart Association class IV (HR=4.42; P=0.002), cardiogenic shock (HR=3.75; P=0.003), creatinine (HR=1.007; P=0.003), defect size (HR=1.09; P=0.026), inotropes (HR=4.18; P=0.005), and absence of revascularization therapy for presenting myocardial infarction (HR=3.28; P=0.009). Prior surgical closure (HR=0.12; P=0.040) and immediate shunt reduction (HR=0.49; P=0.037) were associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defect is a reasonably effective treatment for these extremely high-risk patients. Mortality remains high, but patients who survive to discharge do well in the longer term.