Carpal Joint Malalignment With Distal Radius Malunion and Factors in Correction After Distal Radius Osteotomy.

Purpose: There is a paucity of data regarding recommendations on when to correct for distal radius malunions and if the initial severity of the radiographic outcomes is correlated with the ability to correct to baseline. We evaluated the effects of distal radius corrective osteotomy on preoperative carpal joint malalignment resulting from distal radius malunions, correlated injury severity and osteotomy timing to radiographic outcomes, and developed a straightforward classification system for predicting radiocarpal and midcarpal maladaptive patterns. Methods: A retrospective review included 26 patients (27 wrists) who reported initial closed treatment for a distal radius fracture and who subsequently underwent a corrective osteotomy for malunion. Data included patient demographics, range of motion, preoperative fracture deformity, fracture deformity correction, and preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements of the radiocarpal and midcarpal alignment patterns. Results: Of 27 dorsally angulated malunions, 16 were classified as type 1 midcarpal adaptation and 11 as type 2 radiocarpal adaptation. The midcarpal group showed significant improvements in distal radius and carpal alignment parameters after surgery, except for the ulnar variance. The radiocarpal group showed significant improvements in distal radius and carpal alignment parameters, except for the radiolunate angle, radioscaphoid angle, and capitolunate angle. The radiocarpal group exhibited an overall decrease in range of motion compared with that of the midcarpal group. Severity of the fracture and time taken from injury to corrective osteotomy correlated with the ability to correct carpal radiographic parameters in dorsally angulated malunions of the distal radius, especially beyond 40 weeks. Conclusions: The severity of the initial fracture and time taken from injury to corrective osteotomy correlate with the ability to correct radiographic parameters in dorsally angulated malunions of the distal radius. Early correction of distal radius malunions is recommended, especially in radiocarpal malalignment patterns. A useful analysis for predicting midcarpal and radiocarpal adaptation patterns is the direct measurement of the distal articular surface of the radius to the lunate, termed the relative-radiolunate angle. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Bridge Plating of a First Proximal Phalanx Intra-articular Base Fracture-Benefits Over External Fixation.

A 62-year-old right-handed man presented with an intra-articular fracture of the proximal phalanx base of the right thumb after a motor vehicle accident. Computed tomography revealed severe comminution, apex volar angulation, and minimal bone stock at the proximal phalanx base. The patient consented to open reduction internal fixation with a locking plate to bridge the fracture and cancellous bone grafting of the distal radius. The hardware was removed at 8 weeks, without complications. The patient began therapy, and at 19 weeks following the surgery, the patient's thumb metacarpophalangeal joint motion was 10° to 30° and the interphalangeal motion was 30° to 50°. Radiographs showed fracture union and proper alignment, with modest shortening. The patient was satisfied with this result. Bridge plating may be an alternative to external fixation for certain thumb fractures, with the potential to maintain alignment and articular congruity while permitting earlier return to activities of daily living and avoiding the risk of pin-track infections.

Patient Perspectives on Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Patients received care over telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, and their perspective is useful for hand surgeons. METHODS: Online surveys were sent October-November 2020 to 497 patients who received telemedicine care. Questions were free-response and multi-item Likert scales asking about telehealth in general, limitations, benefits, comparisons to in-person visits, and opinions on future use. RESULTS: The response rate was 26% (n = 130). Prior to the pandemic, 55% had not used telemedicine for hand surgery consultation. Patients liked their telemedicine visit and felt their provider spent enough time with them (means = 9/10). In all, 48% would have preferred in-person visits despite the pandemic, and 69% would prefer in-person visits once the pandemic concludes. While 43% had no concerns with telemedicine, 36% had difficulties explaining their symptoms. Telemedicine was easy to access and navigate (M = 9/10). However, 23% saw telemedicine of limited value due to the need for an in-person visit soon afterward. Of these patients, 46% needed an in-person visit due to inadequate physical examination. Factors that make telemedicine more favorable to patients included convenience, lack of travel, scheduling ease, and time saved. Factors making telemedicine less favorable included need for in-person examination or procedure, pain assessment, and poor connectivity. There was no specific appointment time the cohort preferred. Patient recommendations to improve telemedicine included decreasing wait times and showing patient queue, wait time, or physician status online. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine was strongly liked by patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, nearly 70% of patients still preferred in-person visits for the future.

Return to Sport Following Distal Triceps Repair.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to examine the timeline of return-to-sport following distal triceps repair; evaluate the degree of participation and function upon returning to sport; and identify risk factors for failure to return to sport. METHODS: Patients who underwent distal triceps repair with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients completed a subjective sports questionnaire and were scored on a visual analog scale for pain; the Mayo Elbow Performance Index; the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; and the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation. RESULTS: Out of 113 eligible patients who had a distal triceps repair, 81 patients (71.7%) were contacted. Sixty-eight patients (84.0%) who participated in sports prior to surgery were included at 6.0 ± 4.0 years after surgery, and the average age was 46.6 ± 11.5 years. Sixty-one patients (89.7%) resumed playing at least 1 sport by 5.9 ± 4.4 months following distal triceps repair. However, 18 patients (29.5%) returned to a lower level of activity intensity. The average postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; Mayo Elbow Performance; visual analog scale for pain; and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores were 8.2 ± 14.0, 89.5 ± 13.4, 2.0 ± 1.7, and 82.2 ± 24.3, respectively. No patients underwent revision surgery at the time of final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Distal triceps repair enables 89.7% of patients to return to sport by 5.9 ± 4.4 months following surgery. However, 29.5% of patients were unable to return to their preinjury level of activity. It is imperative that patients are appropriately educated to manage postoperative expectations regarding sport participation following distal triceps repair. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Recovery from open osteocapsular débridement for primary elbow osteoarthritis is rapid and does not depend on preoperative motion.

Background and Hypothesis: Osteocapsular débridement is a surgical treatment for functionally limiting primary elbow osteoarthritis (PEOA). We hypothesized that postoperative improvement in range of motion (ROM) following elbow osteocapsular débridement could be grouped into predictable patterns. We also hypothesized that significant improvements in ROM frequently take place for up to 6 months after surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open elbow débridement for PEOA was performed. Demographic information and surgical approach were recorded. ROM data were also collected at preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative intervals of 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Growth mixture modeling and latent class growth analysis were performed to identify groups of motion recovery trajectories, while Student's t-tests were performed to compare ROM data between intervals. Results: Our study included 76 patients who underwent open elbow débridement (9 with a lateral approach, 55 medial, and 12 both) for PEOA. The mean preoperative arc of motion was 95° ± 22°. This improved to a mean final motion arc of 127° ± 11 at final follow-up, which was 92% of the mean intraoperative arc. The mean time to achieve final motion was 3 months, with 79% of patients achieving their final ROM arc by this point. Patients achieved an average of 85% of their final arc of motion by the 2-week postoperative visit (92% of final flexion and 61% of final extension). Growth mixture modeling and latent class growth analysis did not identify any statistically significant groupings for postoperative ROM progression trajectories. Arc of motion preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at 2 weeks postoperatively did not correlate with the final arc of motion. There were no characteristics or thresholds of motion which conferred a higher likelihood of achieving a better result postoperatively. Conclusions: ROM recovery after osteocapsular débridement for PEOA is not dependent on preoperative, intraoperative, or 2-week postoperative arcs of motion. Most of the ROM recovery occurs in the early postoperative period, with flexion restored preferentially faster than extension. The final arc of motion can be expected by 3 months postoperatively. This knowledge has potential benefit in affecting patients' personal time commitment to rehabilitation and the overall cost for therapy and splinting beyond the 3-month time point.

Relationship Between Preoperative and Postoperative Motion After Four-Corner Wrist Fusion for Osteoarthritis: Clustering and Regression Analyses.

PURPOSE: Four-corner fusion (4CF) is a surgical option for refractory scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrist arthritis. Preoperative range of motion (ROM) predicts outcomes in many orthopedic procedures. This study investigates ROM in a cohort of 4CF patients to examine the relationship between preoperative and postoperative motion and identifies different clinical patterns. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 4CF patients. Patients with a history of inflammatory arthritis and radiographic characteristics of inflammation were excluded. Demographics, prior wrist surgery history, and ROM data were collected at preoperative and postoperative intervals after cast removal at 8 weeks, 3 months, and 8 months. Regression analysis compared the motion before and after 4CF. Subsequent cluster analysis to reduce confounding compared postoperative motion differences in the top 20% to the bottom 20% of patients by preoperative motion. RESULTS: We included 148 patients; 27 had prior surgery on the ipsilateral wrist. Preoperative arc averaged 86° ± 28° (flexion 46° ± 17°, extension 40° ± 15°); 8-week arc 43° ± 19° (flexion 19° ± 12°, extension 24° ± 12°); 3-month arc 62° ± 17° (flexion 30° ± 12°, extension 32° ± 11°); and 8-month arc 74° ± 17° (flexion 36° ± 11°, extension 37° ± 12°). Preoperative and final arcs were (r = 0.39). Clustering by the preoperative arc, the top 20% (mean 124° ± 15°) achieved a mean final arc of 81° ± 16°, while the bottom 20% (mean 47° ± 16°) achieved a mean final arc of 65° ± 19°. Intercluster differences were statistically significant. The bottom 20% gained motion postoperatively. Most patients in the middle 60% did not differ significantly in postoperative motion. CONCLUSIONS: Although wrist motion following 4CF correlates positively with preoperative motion, most patients do not differ significantly in postoperative motion. Patients with substantial preoperative motion deficits gain motion after 4CF. This information is important when counseling patients, determining the timing of surgical intervention, and managing expectations related to motion outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Traction Tenolysis for Flexor Tendon Adhesions: Outcomes in 97 Patients.

PURPOSE: Traction tenolysis is an alternative, less invasive way of performing flexor tendon tenolysis by winding affected tendons around a surgical instrument. This study assessed outcomes and complications in a cohort of patients who underwent traction tenolysis to determine its effectiveness. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients who underwent traction tenolysis performed by 4 fellowship-trained hand surgeons from 2010 to 2019. We collected data on preoperative and postoperative ranges of motion, the number and type of prior ipsilateral hand surgeries, and the duration of therapy and follow-up. Cases of traditional open tenosynovectomy tenolysis were excluded. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds of the patients achieved more than 75% of the normal total active motion, and 80% achieved at least 50% of the normal total active motion. The mean total active flexion increased significantly by 42° and passive flexion by 25°. The differences in active and passive flexion significantly decreased from 28° before the surgery to 9° after the surgery. The active and passive flexion of the distal interphalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints improved similarly, at approximately 20° and 10°, respectively. The average duration of follow-up was 11 ± 8 weeks. The complication rate was 5%: 1 case of intraoperative flexor digitorum superficialis tendon rupture, 1 case of postoperative infection, and 3 reoperations because of failure to progress. CONCLUSIONS: Traction tenolysis is an alternative to traditional open tenolysis surgery in selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Telemedicine Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of an International Survey.

Objective The aim of the study is to survey hand surgeons' perspectives on telemedicine during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and intended applications after the pandemic. Methods Online surveys were sent to 285 Canadian and American surgeons in late April and early May 2020. Results Response rate was 63% (180)-84% (152) American and 16% (28) Canadian. Forty-three percent (76) of respondents were in private practice, 36% (64) academics, 13% (24) privademics, and 6% (12) hospital employed. The most common telemedicine platform was Zoom. During the pandemic, 42% of patient visits were conducted via telemedicine; however, 37% required a subsequent in-person office visit. The most common complaint by surgeons was the inability to provide routine in-office procedures. The most beneficial feature was ease of use, and the most frustrating feature was connectivity difficulty. Time spent was similar to in-person visits, and surgeons were likely to recommend their platforms. Surgeons were neutral about using telehealth in the future and were most likely to use it for follow-up visits. New patient visits for traumatic injuries or fractures were of limited value. Canadians used telemedicine for a greater proportion than Americans (50 vs. 40%, p <0.05) and spent more time than in-person visits (7/10 vs. 5/10, p <0.05). Americans were more likely to use telemedicine for postoperative follow-up visits (6/10 vs. 4/10, p <0.05) and in mornings before clinic opens (4/10 vs. 2/10, p <0.05). Private practices were more likely to use telemedicine for future allied health provider visits than all other practice types ( p <0.05). Conclusion Telemedicine comprised nearly half of patient encounters during the COVID-19 pandemic, but limitations remain.

Progression patterns of range of motion progression after open release for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

Background & Hypothesis: Post-traumatic stiffness of the elbow may be treated surgically with open osteocapsular release. This study investigated postoperative range of motion (ROM) improvements after this procedure. We hypothesized that there would be predictable recovery patterns and significant progress up to 6 months after surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open elbow release for post-traumatic stiffness (PTS) was performed. Demographic information and surgical approach were recorded. Patients with ipsilateral primary elbow osteoarthritis were excluded. Range of motion (ROM) data were collected at preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative intervals of 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) and latent class growth analysis (LCGA) were performed to identify motion recovery trajectory groups, and Student's t-tests were performed to compare ROM data between intervals. Results: One hundred and eighty-seven patients who underwent open elbow release for PTS were included (112 with a medial approach, 50 lateral, and 25 both). The mean preoperative arc was 84° ± 31, and the arc of motion at final follow-up was 119° ± 19 (P < .05). The mean time to the final follow-up arc of motion was 16 weeks, with 56% of patients achieving their final arc by their 3-month follow-up visit. The largest improvement was seen with extension between 6 weeks and 3 months, where 26% of the extension at final follow-up was gained. Most of the recovery occurred within the first 3 months postoperatively, with small improvements thereafter. GMM and LCGA did not identify statistically significant groups for postoperative ROM progression trajectories. Arc of motion preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at 2 weeks postoperatively did not correlate with the final arc of motion. There were no demographic or historical characteristics, or thresholds of motion, which conferred a higher likelihood of achieving a better result postoperatively. Conclusions: ROM recovery after surgical release for post-traumatic elbow stiffness did not depend on the preoperative, intraoperative, or 2-week postoperative arcs of motion. Most ROM recovery occurs early after surgery, and maximal arc of motion can be expected by approximately 16 weeks postoperatively. This knowledge may inform patients about their expected rehabilitation and splinting time and reduce the total costs of therapy.

Spontaneous Diabetic Myonecrosis Presenting as Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

A 57-year-old man with diabetes mellitus presented with a 4-day history of left palm pain out of proportion, with swelling, erythema, and dense median and ulnar nerve distribution sensory changes. Magnetic resonance imaging with and without contrast revealed diffuse hand edema and myonecrosis. The patient was treated surgically because the examination was concerning for acute carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar nerve compression. Spontaneous diabetic myonecrosis is a complication of diabetes mellitus that can be confused with several other conditions. It presents as acute-onset painful swelling in any muscle, and in the hand, may cause compressive neuropathies that necessitate surgical intervention.

Timing of Complications following Hand Surgery.

Introduction Our purposes were to (1) characterize the timeline of eight postoperative complications following hand surgery, (2) assess complication timing for the procedures that account for the majority of adverse events, and (3) determine any differences in complication timing between outpatient and inpatient procedures. Materials and Methods Patients undergoing hand, wrist, and forearm procedures from 2005 to 2016 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Timing of eight adverse events was characterized. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compare adverse event timing between inpatient and outpatient procedures. Results A total of 59,040 patients were included. The median postoperative day of diagnosis for each adverse event was as follows: myocardial infarction 1, pulmonary embolism 2, acute kidney injury 3, pneumonia 8, deep vein thrombosis 9, sepsis 13, urinary tract infection 15, and surgical site infection 16. Amputations, fasciotomies, and distal radius open reduction internal fixation accounted for the majority of adverse events. Complication timing was significantly earlier in inpatients compared with outpatients for myocardial infarction. Conclusion This study characterizes postoperative adverse event timing following hand surgery. Surgeons should have the lowest threshold for testing for each complication during the time period of greatest risk. Level of Evidence This is a therapeutic, Level III study.

The use of tranexamic acid in open elbow release surgery.

Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been effective in reducing perioperative blood loss in hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty. Our purpose was to assess the effect of TXA on perioperative blood loss for open elbow release. Methods: Consecutive open elbow releases performed between October 2016 and March 2020 were identified. Patients were included if both anterior and posterior joint releases with a single medial approach was performed. From November 2018 onward, intravenous TXA and topical TXA infused through a deep hemovac drain were administered as part of the perioperative protocol. Drain output, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative aspiration rate, and postoperative transfusion frequency were assessed. Results: Fifty patients (25 TXA, 25 non-TXA) were included. Drain output was significantly lower in the TXA-treated group compared to the non-treated group (121 mL vs. 221 mL; p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and the incidence of postoperative aspiration between groups. None of the patients received a blood transfusion or had a documented thromboembolic event. Discussion: The use of tranexamic acid with open elbow release surgeries resulted in decreased drain output, with no thromboembolic events. Perioperative tranexamic acid can be a safe and effective modality in reducing perioperative blood loss for open elbow release surgery.

Radiographic evaluation of partial articular radial head fractures: assessment of reliability.

BACKGROUND: Historically, treatment of partial articular radial head fractures has hinged on radiographic assessment and application of the Mason classification. The inter- and intra-rater reliability of radiographic assessment and classification of radial head fractures may be lower than previously reported. We hypothesized that radiographic assessment leads to an underestimation of the number of fragments, percentage of articular surface involved, and displacement in millimeters. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all Mason II radial head fractures treated at our institution. Four independent observers performed radiographic assessment of the cohort. An independent observer performed these measurements on high-resolution computed tomography (CT) imaging, the reference standard. Radiographic assessments were then correlated with the CT findings using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Kappa statistic, where indicated. RESULTS: Fifty-nine Mason II radial head fractures were reviewed. These results were not impressive, with all comparisons showing a Kappa statistic less than 0.5 (ie, weak agreement). Intra-rater reliability was similar: displacement (measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient) was 0.58, percent articular involvement was 0.74, and the number of fragments (measured by the Kappa statistic) was 0.28. Fracture displacement was generally underestimated on radiographic measurements when compared to CT scan. Nearly half (45%) of all cases demonstrated inaccurate fragment number assessment when compared to the reference standard. CONCLUSION: Radiographs show poor inter- and intra-observer reliability for determining radial head fracture morphology. Assessment of the number of fragments was particularly inaccurate. High-resolution CT should be considered for patients with Mason II radial head fractures, especially in cases of poorly visualized fracture characteristics or borderline amounts of displacement, in an effort to appropriately indicate patients for the variety of treatment options available today.

Return to Yoga Rates Are High After Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures.

Background: Yoga is a popular activity involving extreme wrist positioning and extension loading. Our purpose was to quantify the prevalence of preoperative yoga participation and characterize subsequent ability to return to yoga in patients undergoing volar locked plating of distal radius fractures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of distal radius open reduction internal fixation between August 2015 and March 2017. Patients were included if they were treated with volar locked plating and if they participated in yoga on a regular basis preoperatively. Patients were contacted at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively and surveyed about yoga participation. Results: A total of 149 patients who underwent distal radius volar plating were surveyed. Thirty-one patients (32 procedures, 20.8% of surveyed patients) participated in yoga on a regular basis preoperatively. Overall, 90.3% returned to yoga in some capacity. Mean times to return to yoga in any capacity, with weight-bearing, and in a "steady state" were 5.7, 7.4, and 10.0 months, respectively. Of patients who resumed yoga, 65.5% returned to the same or better level of yoga. Satisfaction with participation in yoga was 8.9 (out of 10). Conclusions: We found a relatively high yoga participation rate in patients undergoing distal radius fracture fixation, suggesting the need to be able to effectively counsel these patients. Our results demonstrate a high rate of return to yoga, although approximately one-third of patients experienced a decreased level of participation. Surgeons can use this information to set appropriate expectations.

Report on the Evidence-Based Practice Committee's Survey on Dupuytren Disease.

Purpose: The Evidence-Based Practice Committee of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) set out to assess the membership's practice patterns (PPs) and knowledge of evidence-based principles for Dupuytren disease (DD). Methods: A 21-item multiple-choice survey was distributed to all ASSH members via email in June 2020. Questions were divided into 2 types: evidence-based practice (EBP) and PPs. The survey addressed the following subtopics: nonsurgical, percutaneous, and open surgical management of DD. Results: The response rate was 18% (n = 419). Of 13 EBP questions, 5 were answered with the preferred response by >75% of surgeons. The remaining 8 EBP questions had greater frequencies of less preferred responses, which concerned the current evidence for percutaneous management, as well as nonsurgical and postoperative management of DD. Of the PP questions, there were differences in opinion on how to manage a painful nodule, the percutaneous technique (eg, collagenase injection vs percutaneous needle aponeurotomy), and the choice of surgical incision for open fasciectomy (eg, Bruner incision with Z-plasties, partial closure with an open transverse palmar component, or longitudinal incision with Z-plasties). Conclusions: Hand surgeons continue to be well informed about current evidence-based practices for treating DD and can improve their knowledge by familiarizing themselves with current data on percutaneous and nonsurgical methods. There exist differences in PPs for DD in the ASSH membership, specifically with less invasive management; and knowledge of peer practices can help navigate differences, critically interpret the evidence, and optimize patient care. Type of study/level of evidence: Economic/Decision Analyses V.

Return to work following distal triceps repair.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate and duration of return to work in patients undergoing distal triceps repair (DTR). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing DTR from 2009 to 2017 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Patients completed a standardized and validated work questionnaire; a visual analog scale for pain; the Mayo Elbow Performance Score; the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; and a satisfaction survey. RESULTS: Of 113 eligible patients who underwent DTR, 81 (71.7%) were contacted. Of these patients, 74 (91.4%) were employed within 3 years prior to surgery (mean age, 46.0 ± 10.7 years; mean follow-up, 5.9 ± 3.9 years). Sixty-nine patients (93.2%) returned to work by 2.2 ± 3.2 months postoperatively. Sixty-six patients (89.2%) were able to return to the same level of occupational intensity. Patients who held sedentary-, light-, medium-, and high-intensity occupations were able to return to work at a rate of 100.0%, 100.0%, 80.0%, and 76.9%, respectively, by 0.3 ± 0.5 months, 1.8 ± 1.5 months, 2.5 ± 3.6 months, and 4.8 ± 3.9 months, respectively, postoperatively. Of the workers' compensation patients, 15 (75%) returned to work by 6.5 ± 4.3 months postoperatively, whereas 100% of non-workers' compensation patients returned to work by 1.1 ± 1.6 months (P < .001). Seventy-one patients (95.9%) were at least somewhat satisfied, with 50 patients (67.6%) reporting excellent satisfaction. Seventy-two patients (97.3%) would undergo the operation again if presented the opportunity. A single patient (1.4%) required revision DTR. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 93% of patients who underwent DTR returned to work by 2.2 ± 3.2 months postoperatively. Patients with higher-intensity occupations had an equivalent rate of return to work but took longer to return to their preoperative level of occupational intensity. Information regarding return to work is imperative in preoperative patient consultation to manage expectations.

Reoperation Risk After Total Elbow Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Distal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare reoperation risk after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for intra-articular distal humerus fractures in elderly patients. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative. SETTING: Five percent Medicare Part B claims database. PATIENTS: Patients older than 65 years of age with closed distal humerus fractures undergoing TEA or ORIF from 1996 to 2016. INTERVENTION: TEA and ORIF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reoperation risk based on multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: A total of 142 TEA and 522 ORIF cases were identified. TEA patients had a greater age and Charlson Comorbidity Index , as well as a higher prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis than ORIF patients (P < 0.05). Although reoperation risk was lower for TEA than that for ORIF within the entire cohort (11.3% vs. 25.1%; hazard ratio = 0.49; P = 0.014), no significant difference was found for TEA and ORIF performed between 2006 and 2016 (12.6% vs. 18.4%; hazard ratio = 0.73; P = 0.380). The death rate was 65.5% in the TEA group at 3.6 years and 55.7% in the ORIF group at 4.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: TEA was associated with a decreased reoperation risk compared with ORIF, although this difference did not exist for more recent procedures after popularization of the locking plate technology and half of the reoperations after ORIF were for instrumentation removal. The high death rate within several years of the index procedure may contribute to the low TEA revision rate beyond the short-term when following patients into the medium and long term. Further study comparing TEA and locked plating using prospective, randomized data with long-term follow-up and functional outcomes is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Elbow Arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a potentially devastating complication after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) that can lead to significant morbidity for the patient as well as increased health care-related costs. Despite the potential morbidity associated with TEA PJI, evidence is limited regarding an optimal treatment algorithm. Initial management typically consists of either irrigation and debridement or 2-stage revision. A stable implant, a functioning triceps, and an intact soft tissue envelope are necessary to perform irrigation and debridement. Irrigation and debridement is associated with a relatively high risk of infection recurrence especially in chronic infections. Two-stage revision offers a lower recurrence risk, although there is a 25% chance of not completing the second stage. Resection arthroplasty, arthrodesis, and amputation are salvage options, whereas medical treatment, in the form of antibiotics alone, is reserved for poor surgical candidates. Further multicenter prospective study and retrospective review of registry data focusing on different treatment algorithms, prevention strategies, and functional outcomes would be helpful to elucidate the ideal management of elbow PJI.

Anatomic Restoration of the Biceps Brachii Insertion Through a Single Anterior Incision.

Treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures with surgical repair has been shown to restore peak elbow flexion and supination strength, as well as minimize fatigue with repetitive activity. The anatomic footprint of the biceps is slightly posterior to the apical prominence of the bicipital tuberosity. Single-incision and double-incision methods for repairing distal biceps tendon ruptures have been described. However, previously described single-incision techniques have been unable to accurately re-establish the anatomic position of the tendinous insertion. We describe our technique of performing an anatomic distal biceps repair using a single anterior incision. The proposed benefits of this technique include the restoration of the anatomic footprint area, insertion site, and consequently the native cam effect of the bicipital tuberosity all through a single incision. From a patient's perspective, the proposed benefit of this technique includes the restoration of supination strength using a single incision.

Restoration of peak strength and endurance following distal biceps reconstruction with allograft for chronic ruptures.

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps reconstruction for chronic rupture often requires a graft to recover length and allow for distal tendon reattachment to bone. Our purpose was to assess peak strength and endurance recovery following biceps reconstruction with tendon grafts. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that allograft reconstruction would result in decreased flexion and supination peak strength and endurance. METHODS: Consecutive distal biceps reconstructions with allograft, performed for chronic ruptures between January 2008 and March 2018 at a single institution, were reviewed. Isokinetic dynamometry for peak strength and endurance testing was performed on the operative and contralateral arms in flexion and supination. Functional outcomes and overall satisfaction with the operation were determined. RESULTS: Eleven patients were available for a complete evaluation, including dynamometry, at a mean of 46 months postoperatively. Reconstructions demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward decreased peak flexion strength (P = .06), and significantly decreased peak supination strength (P = .01) compared with the unaffected arm. There were no differences in flexion and supination endurance between the affected and unaffected arms. Using standardized outcome scales, patients reported excellent function. CONCLUSION: Chronic biceps ruptures undergoing reconstruction are highly functional and patients are satisfied. Somewhat surprisingly, supination and flexion endurance were equal to the contralateral, uninvolved arm. However, this procedure does not restore peak supination strength.