A novel adenosine signalling-based prognostic signature in gastric cancer and its association with cancer immune features and immunotherapy response.

Reliable prognostic signatures that can reflect the intrinsic characteristics of gastric cancer (GC) are still rare. Here, we developed an adenosine-based prognostic signature and explored its association with the tumour immune in GC patients, aiming at confirming the prognostic value of adenosine-related genes and guiding the GC risk stratification and immunotherapeutic response prediction. We collected adenosine pathway-related genes from STRING websites and manual searching. We enrolled the The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort and four gene expression omnibus cohorts of GC for generating and validating the adenosine pathway-based signature using the Cox regression method. Gene expression in the signature was verified using polymerase chain reaction. We also performed gene set enrichment analysis, immune infiltration assessment and immunotherapy response prediction based on this signature. Our study resulted in a six-gene adenosine signature (GNAS, CXCR4, PPP1R1B, ADCY6, NT5E and NOS3) for risk stratification of GC prognosis, with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve up to 0.767 for predicting 10-year overall survival (OS). In the training cohort, patients with signature-defined high risk had significantly poorer OS than those with low risk (p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified the signature as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 2.863, 95% confidence interval [1.871-4.381], p < .001). These findings were confirmed in four independent cohorts. Expression detection showed that all signature genes were upregulated in both GC tissues and cell lines. Further analysis revealed that the signature-defined high-risk patients were characterised by immunosuppressive states and associated with a poor immunotherapy response. In conclusion, the adenosine pathway-based signature represents a promising risk stratification tool for GC in guiding individualised prognostication and immunotherapy.

Case Report: Chemotherapy-free treatment with camrelizumab and anlotinib for elderly patients with KRAS and TP53 mutated advanced lung cancer.

Background: Lung cancer is a major public health issue and an enormous burden on society in China. Most lung cancers occur in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and many factors limit their treatment options. Chemotherapy-free therapy can avoid psychological fear, treatment pain, and adverse reactions caused by chemotherapy. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer with tumour protein p53 (TP53) gene mutations or Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) gene mutations tend to be more sensitive to anlotinib or programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) drugs. However, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue is a proto-oncogene downstream of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene; therefore, if the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue gene has an activating mutation, EGFR-targeted drug resistance may occur. Further studies are needed to explore whether patients with dual Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue and tumour protein p53 mutations can be treated with targeted immunotherapy without chemotherapy. Case presentation: A 74-year-old man was referred to the Lanzhou University Second Hospital due to chest tightness, shortness of breath, and weight loss for 2 months and was diagnosed with moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Laboratory examinations showed increased alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen (CA)-125, and CA199 levels, and gene sequencing indicated mutations in Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue and tumour protein p53. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positive PD-L1 and PD-1 expression. Peripheral blood immune checkpoint test using flow cytometry indicated that the PD-1 + CD8 levels were positive. After multi-disciplinary treatment, therapy with a combination of anlotinib and camrelizumab was initiated. Camrelizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks. Anlotinib 12 mg was administered orally daily before breakfast for 2 weeks with a week of rest in every cycle of 21 days. A reduction in alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125, CA199, and CA724 levels was observed up to the first cycle, which decreased within the normal limits up to the second cycle and continued until the eighteenth cycle. The patient's chest tightness, shortness of breath, weight loss, and other symptoms significantly improved following treatment. Computed tomography imaging showed that the neoplastic lesion was dramatically reduced. The patient is currently being followed-up for more than 2 years to evaluate the duration of the response. Conclusion: Chemotherapy-free immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy is an effective treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue and tumour protein p53 mutations. Such therapies should be supported with further clinical studies with larger sample sizes.

LAMC1 is a Novel Prognostic Factor and a Potential Therapeutic Target in Gastric Cancer.

Purpose: To investigate the role of LAMC1 in gastric cancer (GC), if it is of great importance to identify tumour driver genes with prognostic value. Patients and Methods: GC-related gene expression profile data were downloaded from TCGA. R-limma package and univariate Cox regression were used to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and survival-genes, respectively. Then, the ClusterProfiler package was used to analyse the Gene Ontology and pathway enrichment of DEGs. Cytoscape was used to build a protein interaction network (PPI) and identify key genes. The GEPIA2 and TIMER databases were used to validate the differential expression of LAMC1. The relationship between LAMC1 and the prognosis of GC was analysed by the KM. GSEA and GSVA were used to analyse the major activated and mutated pathways, respectively. Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was used to reidentify the expression of LAMC1 in GES-1 and 5 GC cell lines. Finally, we explored the relationship between LAMC1 and FGFR1. Results: A total of 266 DEGs were be selected, which were mainly enriched in extracellular structure organization. LAMC1 was identified as one of the hub genes. The expression of LAMC1 was significantly higher in GC tissue than in paracancerous tissues, and the prognosis of the GC patient with high expression of LAMC1 was relatively poor. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis indicated that LAMC1 could be used as an independent prognostic indicator. The results of GSEA and GSVA showed that LAMC1 was mainly enriched in pathways such as MYOGENESIS and UV_RESPONSE_DN. The RT-qPCR results showed that the expression level in AGS cells was significantly higher than that in gastric epithelial cells. LAMC1 may play a role in the development of gastric cancer by influencing FGFR1. Conclusion: LAMC1 may mediate the occurrence and development of GC and has potential as a biomarker for the prognosis and treatment of GC.

Prognostic significance of tissue factor in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive digestive system tumour with poor prognosis. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication of pancreatic cancer, and tissue factor (TF) contributes to the generation of a hypercoagulable state and thrombotic disease in pancreatic cancer. Several studies showed that an elevated TF level was related to the development of VTE and influenced the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. Thus, we wish to conduct a systematic review of literature to clarify the prognostic significance of TF in pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Studies comparing the circulating microparticle-associated TF (MP TF) level between patients who had pancreatic cancer with and without VTE will be included to evaluate the roles of TF in VTE development. Studies comparing the survival data between patients with high TF expression and low TF expression will also be included to explore the association of TF expression with patient survival. The outcomes are plasma MP TF level and survival endpoints (overall and progression-free survival), respectively. Primary studies of any type published in English will be included. Two reviewers will search Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from inception to June 2020, retrieve relevant studies, and independently select the literatures and extract data from the included studies. The quality of each included study will be assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score. The HR and 95% CI of each study will be pooled for survival outcome, and the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs will be used for continuous outcomes. If meta-analysis is inappropriate, the result will only be reported qualitatively. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be considered to identify sources of heterogeneity. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method will be applied to assess the level of evidence of this systematic review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There are no concerning ethical issues. The results will be published. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019133665.

Long Noncoding RNA AFAP1-AS1 Promotes Cell Proliferation and Metastasis via the miR-155-5p/FGF7 Axis and Predicts Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Actin filament-associated protein 1-antisense RNA 1 (AFAP1-AS1) plays an important role in the development and progression of several human cancers. However, its biological function in gastric cancer (GC) progression is still unknown. METHODS: We used qRT-PCR to detect the relative expression of AFAP1-AS1 in GC tissues and cell lines. The loss-of-function assays were conducted to detect the effect of AFAP1-AS1 on GC development. Bioinformatics analysis, luciferase reporter gene analysis, and RIP analysis were used to identify and validate target genes of AFAP1-AS1. Finally, rescue tests were performed to confirm the influence of the AFAP1-AS1-miR-155-5p-FGF7 axis on GC development. RESULTS: AFAP1-AS1 was upregulated in GC tissues and cell lines and was closely correlated with poor prognosis of GC patients. AFAP1-AS1 knockdown inhibited proliferation, migration, and invasion of GC cells, indicating that AFAP1-AS1 acts as an oncogene in GC. Bioinformatics analysis, dual-luciferase reporter gene detection, and RIP assays validated that AFAP1-AS1 directly interacts to miR-155-5p and could positively affect cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by regulation of the expression of miR-155-5p and FGF7. Further rescue assays revealed that AFAP1-AS1 promotes cell proliferation and metastasis through the miR-155-5p/FGF7 axis in GC. CONCLUSIONS: AFAP1-AS1 might be an oncogenic lncRNA that promoted GC progression by acting as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) that regulates the expression of FGF7 through sponging miR-155-5p, suggesting that AFAP1-AS1 may be a novel potential therapeutic target for GC.