Efficacy and Toxicity of Moderately Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy with Helical TomoTherapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy in Patients with Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Concurrent Chemotherapy: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase 3 Trial.

PURPOSE: The standard treatment schedule for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is chemotherapy with concurrent radiation therapy (60 Gy delivered in 30 fractions), although moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy (Hypo-RT) has also been considered as an alternative strategy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of moderately Hypo-RT with helical TomoTherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (Con-RT) in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC receiving concurrent chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this randomized, multicenter, nonblinded phase 3 clinical trial, eligible patients were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to either the Hypo-RT group (60 Gy in 20 fractions) or Con-RT group (60 Gy in 30 fractions). All patients received 2 cycles of concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy plus 2 cycles of consolidation therapy. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were enrolled from July 27, 2018, to November 1, 2021. The median follow-up was 46 months. The 3-year OS rates in the Hypo-RT and Con-RT groups were 58.4% and 38.4%, respectively (P = .02). The median OS from randomisation was 41 months in the Hypo-RT group and 30 months in the Con-RT group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.94; P = .02). There was no significant difference in the rates of grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse events between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Moderately Hypo-RT using helical TomoTherapy may improve OS in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, while maintaining toxicity rates.

Expression of γ-H2AX and patient prognosis in breast cancer cohort.

H2AX phosphorylation is a novel marker of DNA double-stranded breaks. In the present study, we assessed the γ-H2AX expression, its association with other clinicopathologic characteristics, and the prognosis in a cohort of 97 patients with breast cancer. Ninety-seven specimens of tumor tissue and 77 adjacent normal tissues from patients with breast cancer were examined. All patients underwent modified radical mastectomy or local tumor resection without lymph node dissection. γ-H2AX expression was assessed by standard immunohistochemistry. Patients were followed after surgery for a mean duration of 70.1 ± 18.7 months (range, 6-93 months). The γ-H2AX staining was positive in 27 (27.8%) patients. The positive rates of H2AX were 26.0% and 2.6% in tumor tissue and adjacent normal tissues, respectively. γ-H2AX positive status was negatively associated with TNM staging, with 24 positive cases (32.4%) in TNM staging I-II, while no positive cases in TNM staging III-IV (P = 0.026). Sixteen patients (16.5%) died during the follow-up. No significant association between γ-H2AX expression and patient survival was detected. The unadjusted HR (hazard ratio) for γ-H2AX positive was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.27, 2.60). In TNM staging subgroup analysis, death only occurred in γ-H2AX negative patients. Our study is the first study to demonstrate that expression of γ-H2AX is associated with TNM staging. Due to the small sample and limited follow-up time, we did not observe a significant association between γ-H2AX and patient survival. γ-H2AX expression could be a potential biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prediction, and further studies are in need.

Synergistic effect of phenformin in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ionizing radiation treatment.

Biguanides, used for anti-diabetic drugs, bring more attention in cancer research for their beneficial effects. Phenformin is more potent than metformin. However its potential application as a anti-cancer regent is far behind metformin. In order to investigate any beneficial effect of combination of Phenformin and radiotherapy, non-small cell lung cancer cell lines A549 and H1299 were exposure under different dose of ionizing radiation with or without Phenformin. Results indicated Phenformin showed synergistic effect and could induce more cancer cell apoptosis and inhibition of tumor growth compared with ionizing radiation alone. Furthermore, this synergistic effect may be through different pathway according to cancer cell genotype background. Our results showed Phenformin induced AMPK activation in A549 but not H1299. However, Phenformin activated eIF2α in both cell lines. Our findings implicated Phenformin may be used as radiosensitizer for non-small cell lung cancer therapy.

[A bi-isocentric irradiation technique in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Although the problem of fields gap in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) was solved by mono-isocentric technique, the dose distribution was heterogeneous with "hot" and/or "cold" spots. This study was to explore the best way to solve the problems of both fields gap and dose distribution using bi-isocentric technique. METHODS: Mono-isocentric and bi-isocentric irradiation techniques were used to simulate irradiation, respectively. Mono-isocentric irradiation technique was used to design the beam-split facio-upper neck field and the tangential low neck-supraclavicular field at the match plane. Bi-isocentric irradiation technique was used to design the facio-upper neck field and the tangential low neck-supraclavicular field at the match plane, namely the upper border of the tangential field and the lower border of the facio-upper neck fields. RESULTS: Both mono-isocentric and bi-isocentric irradiation techniques were conformed well to QA at the junction of the neighboring portals, without "hot" or "cold" spots, by dosimetry. But the CADplan Three Dimensions Treatment Planning System showed that the dose distributional uniformity of sagittal plane in nasopharynx was much better in bi-isocentric technique than in mono-isocentric irradiation technique, without cold region in gross tumor volume (GTV) and/or hot region in normal tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Bi-isocentric irradiation technique takes a perfect match-plane and a satisfied dose distributional uniformity.