RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nodal factors are important predictors of prognosis for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), but their synergy effect is not well understood. We aimed to explore their synergy effect in predicting recurrence of clinical N1b PTC. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for cN1b PTC from 2013 to 2017 were enrolled. The association between nodal factors and recurrence was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Interaction and stratified analyses were conducted according to significant nodal factors. RESULTS: Of 1067 cN1b PTC patients included, all nodal factors (bilateral metastasis, largest dimension>3cm, micro and gross extranodal extension (mENE, gENE), No. of metastatic lymph nodes (MLN), lymph node yield (LNY) and ratio (LNR)) were significantly associated with all site and nodal recurrence in the univariate analysis (all P<0.05). Multivariate analyses revealed largest dimension>3cm, gENE and LNR>0.21 were associated with elevated both all site (HR [95%CI], 2.58 [1.67-4.00], 1.87[1.26-3.01], 1.68[1.11-2.42], all P<0.01) and nodal recurrences (HR[95%CI], 2.63[1.67-4.13], 1.90[1.15-3.12], 1.76[1.17-2.66], all P<0.01). LNR and gENE had interactive effect (all site recurrence: P for interaction = 0.009; nodal recurrence: P for interaction = 0.02). LNR was significantly associated with recurrence in patients without gENE (HR[95% CI], all site recurrence: 2.41[1.50-3.87]; nodal recurrence: 2.51[1.52-4.14], all P< 0.001), while when gENE appeared, LNR was no longer associated with recurrence (HR [95% CI], all site recurrence: 0.81[0.43-1.54], P=0.53; nodal recurrence: 0.85[0.43-1.67], P=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Nodal factors have synergy effect in predicting recurrence in cN1b PTC patients. Increasing lymph nodes harvest may only decrease recurrence in patients without gENE, while not in gENE patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The discussion about surgical treatment of patients with papillary thyroid cancer(PTC) has been an ongoing issue, which is mainly focused on characteristics of tumor, but rarely on nonsuspicious contralateral nodules. We aimed to compare recurrence-free survival(RFS)/progression-free survival(PFS) of unilateral PTC patients with nonsuspicious contralateral nodules after different extents of surgery. METHODS: Unilateral PTC patients with nonsuspicious contralateral nodules underwent surgery from 2015 to 2017 were enrolled. The association between surgical extent and RFS/PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 1293 PTC patients (595[46.0%]TT,523[40.4%]lobectomy+nodule enucleation(LNE),175[13.5%]lobectomy) were analyzed. Patients with a greater surgical extent were more likely to be older, have a greater multifocality of the tumor and contralateral nodules, larger contralateral nodules and primary tumors, and more micro extrathyroidal extension (P < 0.05). After a median follow-up of 45 months, significant growth(>3 mm) was identified in 24 (4.6%) and 19 (10.9%) patients in the LNE and lobectomy group, 7 (1.2%), 14 (2.7%) and 11 (6.3%) structural recurrences and 7 (1.2%), 11 (2.1%) and 7 (4.0%) progression in disease were identified in the TT, LNE and lobectomy groups, respectively. Unadjusted and adjusted RFS/PFS were significantly worse for patients treated with lobectomy than for those who underwent LNE or TT(3-year RFS, 95.5%, 98.2% vs. 99.0%; 3-year PFS, 97.9%, 98.9% vs. 99.0%, P < 0.05), but difference in PFS between LNE and TT lost statistical significance (unadjusted P = 0.226, adjusted P = 0.150). CONCLUSIONS: Due to subtle changes in nodules and acceptable prognosis, lobectomy is a considerable option for unilateral PTC patients with nonsuspicious nodules, when a similar prognosis to TT is expected, LNE may be an effective alternative to optimize quality of life.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the methodological and reporting quality of Chinese- and English -language systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) published by Chinese authors between 2016 and 2018. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We searched MEDLINE and Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) for SRs/MAs led by Chinese authors published between 2016 and 2018. We used random sampling to select 10% of the eligible SRs/MAs published in each year from CSCD, and then matched the same number of SRs/MAs in MEDLINE. Reporting quality was evaluated using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and methodological quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) tool. Stratified analyses were conducted to compare the differences of quality between Chinese- and English language SRs/MAs. RESULTS: We identified 336 SRs/MAs (168 in Chinese and 168 in English). The reporting quality in Chinese-language SRs/MAs was slightly lower than English-language SRs/MAs (mean PRISMA scores: 20.58 vs. 21.71 in 2016, 19.87 vs. 21.24 in 2017, and 21.29 vs. 22.38 in 2018). Less than half of both Chinese- and English-language SRs/MAs complied with item 5 (protocol and registration), item 7 (information sources), item 8 (search) and item 27 (funding)). The methodological quality in Chinese -language SRs/MAs was also slightly lower than English -language SRs/MAs (mean AMSTAR-2 scores: 8.07 vs. 9.36 in 2016; 9.21 vs. 10.26 in 2017; 8.86 vs. 9.28 in 2018). Three items (item 2: established a protocol; item 4: use a comprehensive literature search; and item 10: report the sources of funding) were adhered to by less than 10% of both Chinese- and English -language SRs/MAs. Only one (0.6%) Chinese-language SRs/MA and nine (5.4%) English-language SRs/MAs were rated as high methodological quality. CONCLUSION: The reporting and methodological quality of English-language SRs/MAs conducted by authors from China between 2016 and 2018 were slightly better than those of Chinese -language SRs/MAs.
