Discrimination of vertebral fragility fracture with lumbar spine bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: This study is a case-control study to explore risk and protective factors, including clinical data and bone mineral density (BMD), affecting vertebral body fragility fracture in elderly men and postmenopausal women. In addition, we investigate the effectiveness of lumbar spine BMD by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in discriminating vertebral fragility fracture. METHODS: In this case-control study, 52 males and 198 females with vertebral fragility fracture were compared with sex- and age-matched healthy controls to analyse the risk factors that may affect vertebral fragility fracture. The L1-L3 vertebral BMDs were measured by QCT. The difference in risk factors between fracture cases and controls were analysed using student t test and Mann-Whitney U test. The correlation between BMD, age, height and weight were analysed using univariate analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to study statistically significant indexes. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the cut-off values for positive and negative predictive values of BMD for vertebral fracture discrimination. RESULTS: In males, body weight and BMD were significantly different between the fracture group and the control group, whereas BMD was only weakly correlated with age (r = -0.234). In females, only BMD was significantly different between the fracture and control groups. BMD was weakly correlated with height (r = 0.133) and weight (r = 0.120) and was moderately correlated with age (r = -0.387). There was no correlation between BMD and the remaining variables in this study. In both men and women, the BMD (p = 0.000) was the independent protective factor against vertebral fracture. The cut-off values of vertebral BMD for fractures were 64.16 mg/cm3 for males and 55.58 mg/cm3 for females. QCT-measured BMD has a high positive predictive value and negative predictive value for discriminating vertebral fragility fracture across a range of BMD values. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that BMD is closely related to vertebral fragility fracture and that QCT is an effective technique to accurately discriminate vertebral fragility fracture. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: The spine BMD measured by QCT is closely related to fracture, which may allow clinicians to more accurately discriminate which individuals are likely to experience vertebral fragility fracture.

Randomized controlled trial of the absorbency of four dressings and their effects on the evaporation of burn wounds / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Wound dressings are divided into traditional and new types. The new dressings are thought to accelerate wound healing. The purpose of this study was to supplement the scanty data on the absorbency of the new dressings and their effects on evaporation from the burn surface.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The water absorption rate of four dressings (carbon fiber dressing, hydrogel dressing, silver nanoparticle dressing, and vaseline gauze) were measured by the immersion-weight gain method. A total of 120 inpatients with 10% superficial partial-thickness burn wounds were randomly assigned to four groups, each with 30 participants. Carbon fiber dressing, hydrogel dressing, and silver nanoparticle dressing were used in groups A, B, and C as the primary dressing, and traditional vaseline gauze was used in group D as the control. Multi-spot evaporation from normal skin and naked wound, and from wounds covered with each of the four dressings was measured post-burn on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 by an EP-I evaporimeter under conditions of 21 degrees C - 22 degrees C ambient temperature and 74% - 78% humidity.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The absorption rates of the four dressings were 988% with carbon fiber dressing, 96% with silver nanoparticle, 41% with vaseline gauze, and 6% with hydrogel. Evaporation from the naked burn wounds was about 1/3 higher than from normal skin (P < 0.01). Compared with wounds without applied dressing, evaporation from dressed wounds decreased and was time-dependent (P < 0.01). The evaporation of wounds with carbon fiber dressing was the lowest ((13.40 +/- 2.82) mlxh(-1)xm(-2), P < 0.01) on day 1 post-burn, compared with the other groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>All four dressings have water retention capacity while carbon fiber dressing has the highest absorption rate and shows the best containment and evaporation from the burn wound.</p>

Effect of silver nanoparticle dressing on second degree burn wound / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the influence of silver nanoparticle dressing on prevention of infection and healing of the second degree burn wound.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and ninety-one burn patients with second degree including superficial and deep burn wound were randomly divided into three groups. Group A including 65 cases was treated by silver nanoparticle dressing on wounds, and group B (63 cases) and group C (63 cases) were treated by 1% silver sulfadiazine cream and vaseline gauze on their wounds, respectively. Dressing was changed daily, and wound swab bacterial cultures were performed before and after dressing change, and also wound healing times were recorded in each patient.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Group A and B were similar in their bacterium colonizations on wound after treatment with the silver nanoparticle dressing and 1% silver sulfadiazine cream, and they had a similar effect on reducing bacterium colonization on wound after treatment, while in vaseline gauze group bacterium colonization on wound increased after treatment. In group A the wound healing time of superficial second degree was significantly shorter than those in group B and group C (P < 0.01). In deep second degree wounds the healing time in group A was much shorter than that in group C (P < 0.01), but had no significant difference when compared with group B (P > 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Silver nanoparticle dressing can be used on second degree burn wound and can decrease the risk of wound infection and accelerate wound healing.</p>