RESUMO
Objective Through the cell block technique to detect the expression of P16 protein in the liquid-based cytology with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and high degree of cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL),to explore the significance of P16 protein in ASCUS re-evaluate.Methods Collected in our hospital in 2012 cervix liquid based cytology specimens of 45 patients,including of 15 ASCUS,11 HSIL cases,low in 11 cases of epithelial lesions (LSIL) and 2 cases of squamous cell carcinoma,2 cases of atypical glandular cells,4 cases of normal cells as a control.Immunocytochemical analysis of P16 protein control analysis,cytology and histology results.Results The expressing of P16 protein in normal cells,ASCUS,LSIL,HSIL,squamous cell carcinoma,atypical glandular cells in the positive expression rates were 0,20％,27.2％,63.6％,100％,100％.Cytology and biopsy results,cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS 15 cases,biopsy:12 cases of cervicitis,CIN Ⅱ-Ⅲ in 3 cases; cytology the in LSIL11,biopsy:5 cases of cervicitis,CIN Ⅰ 6 cases ; the cytological diagnosis HSIL11 cases,biopsy:cervical four cases of intlammation,CIN Ⅱ-Ⅲ ; cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in 2 cases,biopsy:adenocarcinoma; cytologic diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma in 2 cases,biopsy:squamous cell carcinoma.Conclusion Detection of P16 protein on the cell block can be used for ASCUS classification ASCUS reassessment.
RESUMO
Objective To explore the clinicopathological value of X-ray repair cross complementing gene 1(XRCC1) expression in colorectal carcinoma. Methods The XRCC1 gene expression in 107 cases of colorectal carcinomas, 25 cases of adjacent mucosa and 36 cases of normal colorectal mucosa was detected immunohistochemically, and the correlation between the expression and clinicopathological factors was analyzed. Results The positive rates of XRCC1 expression in colorectal carcinoma and adjacent mucosa,87.8 % (94/107) and 84.0 % (21/25) respectively, were significantly higher than that in the normal colorectal mucosa [27.8 %(10/36) (P=0.000, P =0.000)]. In colorectal carcinoma, the positive rate of XRCC1 expression in the group of poor differentiation [44.4 % (4/9)] was significantly lower than that in the groups of moderate and well differentiation [94.8 % (50/58)(P=0.000) and 87.5 %(35/40) (P=0.015)], while the positive rate of XRCC1 expression was not related to sex, age, location, infiltration depth and lymph node metastasis (P ＞0.05). Conclusion The results indicated that XRCC 1 protein can be used as a marker to diagnose colorectal carcinoma.
