Cartilage Matrix Changes in Hindfoot Joints in Chronic Ankle Instability Patients After Anatomic Repair Using T2-Mapping: Initial Experience With 3-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic repair is widely accepted as the primary surgical treatment for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). T2-mapping is a powerful tool for quantitative assessment of biochemical changes in cartilage matrix. PURPOSE: To longitudinally evaluate cartilage matrix changes in the hindfoot joints of CLAI patients before and after anatomic repair by using T2-mapping with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Thirty-two CLAI patients (males/females = 20/12) and 21 healthy controls (males/females = 13/7). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T; sagittal multi-echo spin-echo technique (T2-mapping), coronal, sagittal, and axial spin-echo PD-FS, and sagittal T1WI sequences. ASSESSMENT: MRI examinations were performed in CLAI patients at baseline (prior to surgery) and 3 years after anatomic repair and in healthy controls. On T2-maps, the hindfoot joints were segmented into 16 cartilage subregions. The T2 value of each subregion was measured. All patients were evaluated with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale at baseline and after surgery. STATISTICAL TESTS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test were used. The differences corresponding to P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: At baseline, the T2 values in most cartilage subregions of talar dome and medial posterior subtalar joint (pSTJ) were higher in CLAI patients than in healthy controls. After surgery, only the T2 value of anteriomedial talar dome decreased from that at baseline (31.11 ± 3.88 msec vs. 34.27 ± 5.30 msec). The T2 values of other subregions with elevated T2 values remained higher than healthy controls. There were no significant differences in T2 values in the midtarsal joints between CLAI patients and healthy controls (P = 0.262, 0.104, 0.169, 0.103). Postoperatively, the patients' AOFAS scores improved significantly from 67.81 to 89.13. DATA CONCLUSION: CLAI patients exhibited elevated T2 values in most subregions of talar dome and medial pSTJ. After anatomic repair, although the patients exhibited good clinical outcomes, the elevated T2 values could not be fully recovered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 4.

Evaluation of Cam Deformity on 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography With the Best-Fit Sphere Technique and the Alpha Angle Marking Method.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) is commonly used for the evaluation of cam deformity; however, it does not display the cam border directly. PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of the best-fit sphere (BFS) method and the alpha angle marking (AAM) method in 3D-CT evaluation for the cam border. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Twenty-six cases of cam deformity, confirmed during hip arthroscopy, were included in this study. All patients underwent a CT scan before surgery. Using multiplanar reconstruction, we obtained reformatted CT images of oblique axial, oblique coronal, and radial views. The alpha angle and femoral head-neck offset ratio (hnoR) were measured on the reformatted CT images. The cam area on 3D-CT was displayed in 4 different ways: by importing the markers from the reformatted CT images of the oblique axial view (cam-oa), the oblique coronal view (cam-oc), or the radial view (cam-r) using the AAM method, or by using the BFS method (cam-bfs). The sizes and locations of the displayed cams were compared. RESULTS: All hips in this study had an alpha angle greater than 60° and an hnoR smaller than 0.17. The radial view measured a larger alpha angle and smaller hnoR than the oblique axial and coronal views (P < .05). The areas of cam-oa, cam-oc, cam-r, and cam-bfs were 161.47 ± 27.96, 89.78 ± 19.23, 241.73 ± 34.55, and 329.75 ± 42.73 mm2, respectively, and their medial-to-lateral ranges along the acetabulum (clockface referents) were 12:30 to 03:00, 11:30 to 01:30, 11:30 to 03:00, and 11:00 to 03:30, respectively. Among the 4 displays, cam-bfs had the largest area and medial-to-lateral range (P < .05), and cam-r had the second largest area and range (P < .05). No significant difference in the mean distances from the acetabular rim to the superior border was detected among the 4 displays (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The cam area displayed by the BFS method on 3D-CT was larger than those evaluated by the AAM method. In the reformatted CT, the sizes and locations of cam deformity differed among the oblique axial, oblique coronal, and radial views, with the radial view showing the greatest area.