Efficacy and Safety of Different Antiplatelet Strategies in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

PURPOSE: Many patients with acute coronary syndrome may experience recurrent myocardial infarction although they are receiving optional therapy, but they are still associated with poor clincial outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess different antiplatelet strategies in these patients. METHODS: This retrospective trial compared ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90-mg BID maintenance dose) and clopidogrel (300- to 600-mg loading dose, 150-mg daily maintenance dose) for the prevention of cardiovascular events in 1083 patients with acute coronary syndrome and recurrent myocardial infarction admitted to the hospital undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. FINDINGS: At the 24-month follow-up, a major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) occurred in 10.5% of patients receiving ticagrelor compared with 13.2% in the clopidogrel group (P = 0.023). Meanwhile, ticagrelor caused a higher rate of minor bleeding (18.1% vs 15.3%; P = 0.008). A survival analysis showed that ticagrelor decreased the incidence of MACCE (log-rank test, P < 0.001) and all-cause death (log-rank test, P = 0.001). The advantage of ticagrelor was also presented according to analysis of Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores. IMPLICATIONS: In patients with recurrent myocardial infarction, the ticagrelor antiplatelet strategy significantly reduced the MACCE rate without increasing the risk of major bleeding, although patients did have a higher risk of minor bleeding.

Outcomes of spironolactone treatment in patients in Northeast China suffering from heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction.

AIM: The treatment effects of spironolactone on heart failure with reduced (HFrEF LVEF <40%) and preserved (HFpEF LVEF ≥50%) ejection fraction are well characterized. It is not clear whether heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, LVEF 40-49%) benefit from spironolactone. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of spironolactone in HFmrEF patients. METHOD: This study compared a high dosage of spironolactone (50 mg daily), a low dosage of spironolactone (25 mg daily), and an untreated group for the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in 279 patients admitted to hospital diagnosed with HFmrEF. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up duration of 1 year, the death and HF-rehospitalization rate demonstrated significantly lower incidence in those taking spironolactone, compared with the untreated group (21.3% vs 34.5%, p = .014, respectively). Further analysis showed no difference between two spironolactone groups (21.8% vs 20.7%, p = .861). Kaplan-Meier analysis of outcome-free survival illustrated a significant difference in survival rate among three groups (log-rank testing, p = .045). Compared with the baseline level, patients receiving 25 mg spironolactone had a lower physical score (p < .05) at 1-year follow-up. MLHFQ total scores in the two spironolactone groups markedly improved compared with the untreated group (p < .001); similar results were observed in the MLHFQ physical scores (p = .025, .001, respectively) and emotional sub-scale (p = .023, .011, respectively); however, paired comparison between the two spironolactone groups showed no difference. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFmrEF, treatment with spironolactone significantly reduced the incidence of the primary composite outcomes of all-cause death, and rehospitalization for the management of heart failure compared with placebo, and a high dosage of spironolactone did not show trends of reduction in MACE.

Development of Mass Spectrum Fingerprint Extraction Technology for Antibiotics in Surface Water / 分析化学

An extract method for the fingerprint feature of 49 kinds of antibiotics belonging to multiple classes in surface water was developed.Water sample was purified and concentrated by tandem dual column (MAX and HLB),and qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (SPE-UPLC-MS/MS) under multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode.The pretreatment was optimized in types of SPE column,loading pH,eluent and redissolution for multiclass antibiotics.The results showed that the linearity of target antibiotics was good in the range of 0.001-0.5 μg/mL (0.01-5 μg/mL for streptomycin).The recoveries were from 51.7% to 94.8%,and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) ranged from 2.19% to 9.67%.The limits of detection(LOD,S/N=3) were 0.01-3.23 μg/L and 0.05-3.43 μg/L and the limits of quantification (LOQ,S/N=10) were 0.04-10.8 μg/L and 0.17-11.4 μg/L in different redissolve solutions.This method was applied to the determination of antibiotics in water samples from 9 sites of Qinhuai River and Xuanwu Lake.

Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel with different dosage in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended as a standard antiplatelet strategy in acute coronary syndrome. For those with reduced pharmacologic response to clopidogrel, strengthening antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel 150mg daily) may reduce adverse clinical events. Ticagrelor is a direct-acting inhibitor of the adenosine diphosphate receptor P2Y12 that has a more rapid onset and offset than clopidogrel. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we compared ticagrelor (180mg loading dose 90mg twice daily thereafter), clopidogrel (300mg loading dose, 75mg or 150mg daily thereafter) for the prevention of cardiovascular events in 273 high-risk patients admitted to coronary care unit with acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS: The rate of IST in hospital was significantly reduced in patients of ticagrelor group comparing with those receiving clopidogrel 75mg (0.69% vs 8.2%, p=0.009). Moreover, the TVR rate was less in the ticagrelor group than clopidogrel 75mg group (2.7% vs 13.1%, p=0.007) 6months follow-up. The incidence of MACCE has no difference between the two clopidogrel groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis of MACCE-free indicated that there was no difference between the three groups. Ticagrelor significantly increased the rate of minor bleeding compared with clopidogrel 75mg daily during hospital (45.5% vs 26.2%,p=0.012) and 6-month follow-up (66.9% vs 45.9%,p=0.004).Bleeding-free prognosis was significantly better in the clopidogrel 75mg daily group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI, the rate of in-stent thrombosis and TVR were significantly reduced treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel 75mg daily, without an increase of overall major bleeding, but with an increase of minor bleeding.