RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the diseases with high disability and mortality worldwide. Recent studies have shown that TBI-related factors may change the complex balance between bleeding and thrombosis, leading to coagulation disorders. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the prediction of coagulopathy and subdural hematoma thickness at admission using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) in patients with severe TBI at 6 months after discharge. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 1,006 patients with severe TBI in large medical centers in three different provinces of China from June 2015 to June 2021 were enrolled after the exclusion criteria, and 800 patients who met the enrollment criteria were included. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the best cut-off values of platelet (PLT), international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and subdural hematoma (SDH) thickness. The ROC curve, nomogram, calibration curve, and the decision curve were used to evaluate the predictive effect of the coagulopathy and Coagulopathy-SDH(X1) models on the prognoses of patients with severe TBI, and the importance of predictive indicators was ranked by machine learning. RESULTS: Among the patients with severe TBI on admission, 576/800 (72%) had coagulopathy, 494/800 (61%) had SDH thickness ≥14.05 mm, and 385/800 (48%) had coagulopathy combined with SDH thickness ≥14.05 mm. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that age, pupil, brain herniation, WBC, CRP, SDH, coagulopathy, and X1 were independent prognostic factors for GOS after severe TBI. Compared with other single indicators, X1 as a predictor of the prognosis of severe TBI was more accurate. The GOS of patients with coagulopathy and thick SDH (X1, 1 point) at 6 months after discharge was significantly worse than that of patients with coagulopathy and thin SDH (X1, 2 points), patients without coagulopathy and thick SDH (X1, 3 point), and patients without coagulopathy and thin SDH (X1, 4 points). In the training group, the C-index based on the coagulopathy nomogram was 0.900. The C-index of the X1-based nomogram was 0.912. In the validation group, the C-index based on the coagulopathy nomogram was 0.858. The C-index of the X1-based nomogram was 0.877. Decision curve analysis also confirmed that the X1-based model had a higher clinical net benefit of GOS at 6 months after discharge than the coagulopathy-based model in most cases, both in the training and validation groups. In addition, compared with the calibration curve based on the coagulopathy model, the prediction of the X1 model-based calibration curve for the probability of GOS at 6 months after discharge showed better agreement with actual observations. Machine learning compared the importance of each independent influencing factor in the evaluation of GOS prediction after TBI, with results showing that the importance of X1 was better than that of coagulopathy alone. CONCLUSION: Coagulopathy combined with SDH thickness could be used as a new, accurate, and objective clinical predictor, and X1, based on combining coagulopathy with SDH thickness could be used to improve the accuracy of GOS prediction in patients with TBI, 6 months after discharge.
RESUMO
Objective To observe the value of drug-eluting bead TACE(D-TACE)combined with apatinib and camrelizumab for treating massive hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods Data of 35 patients with massive HCC who underwent D-TACE sequential apatinib and camrelizumab were retrospectively analyzed.The overall survival(OS)and progression free survival(PFS)were recorded,and the objective response rate(ORR),disease control rate(DCR)and treatment-related adverse event(TRAE)were evaluated.Results Combination treatment were all successfully performed in all 35 cases.At the last follow-up,the median PFS was 8.09 months,and the median OS was 20.00 months.One,3,6,and 12 months after treatments,ORR was 65.71%(23/35),71.43%(25/35),65.71%(23/35)and 60.71%(17/28),respectively,DCR was 94.29%(33/35),88.57%(31/35),80.00%(28/35)and 67.86%(19/28),respectively.TRAE of combination treatment mainly ranged from grade 1 to 2,and all relieved after symptomatic treatments.Conclusion D-TACE combined with apatinib and camrelizumab was effective and safe for treating massive HCC,with controllable adverse reactions.
RESUMO
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of 125I intraluminal irradiation combined with lenvatinib in the treatment of progressive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for 25 patients with progressive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who attended Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, from January 2018 to November 2021, and according to the treatment modality, they were divided into combination group with 13 patients (125I intraluminal irradiation combined with lenvatinib) and control group (125I intraluminal irradiation alone). The two groups were compared in terms of technical success rates, changes in liver function, stent patency, survival time, and incidence rates of adverse events. The independent-samples t test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between two groups, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for comparison of continuous data with skewed distribution between two groups; the Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to evaluate survival time and stent patency. ResultsAll patients had successful implantation of biliary stents and 125I particles, with a technical success rate of 100%. After 1 month of treatment, both groups had significant improvements in the serum levels of total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase (all P<0.05). There were significant differences between the control group and the combination group in the duration of stent patency (7.0 months vs 9.5 months, P=0.022) and median survival time (11.5 months vs 15.6 months, P=0.008). There were no intolerable adverse events in the combination group during treatment. ConclusionCompared with 125I intraluminal irradiation alone, 125I intraluminal irradiation combined with lenvatinib has better efficacy and is a safe and effective treatment regimen for progressive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.