Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Endosc ; 38(6): 3288-3295, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658391

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Surgery is currently the only effective treatment for retroperitoneal tumors that do not involve any specific organ. The use of robots for removing both benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors is considered safe and feasible. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether robotic retroperitoneal tumor resection (RMBRs) is superior to open retroperitoneal malignant resection (OMBRs). This study compares the short-term outcomes of robotic excision of benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors with open excision of the same-sized tumors. METHODS: The study compared demographics and outcomes of patients who underwent robotic resection (n = 54) vs open resection (n = 54) of retroperitoneal tumors between March 2018 and December 2022. A 1:1 matching analysis was conducted to ensure a fair comparison. RESULTS: The study found that RBMRs resulted in reduced operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBM), and postoperative hospital stay (PSH) when compared to OBMRs. Additionally, RBMRs reduced EBL, PHS, and OT for patients with malignant tumor involvement in major vessels. No significant differences were found in tumor size, blood transfusion rate, and morbidity rate between the RBMRs and OBMRs groups. CONCLUSION: When comparing RMBRs to OMBRs, it was observed that RMBR was associated with lower (EBL), shorter postoperative hospital stays (PHS), and reduced operative time (OT) in a specific group of patients with both benign and malignant tumors.


Assuntos
Aorta Abdominal , Tempo de Internação , Duração da Cirurgia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Veia Cava Inferior , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Veia Cava Inferior/cirurgia , Veia Cava Inferior/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Rim/cirurgia , Rim/patologia
2.
J Clin Invest ; 133(4)2023 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36626227

RESUMO

The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), along with the regulatory mechanisms underlying distinct macrophage activation states, remains poorly understood in prostate cancer (PCa). Herein, we report that PCa growth in mice with macrophage-specific Ubc9 deficiency is substantially suppressed compared with that in wild-type littermates, an effect partially ascribed to the augmented CD8+ T cell response. Biochemical and molecular analyses revealed that signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (STAT4) is a crucial UBC9-mediated SUMOylation target, with lysine residue 350 (K350) as the major modification site. Site-directed mutation of STAT4 (K350R) enhanced its nuclear translocation and stability, thereby facilitating the proinflammatory activation of macrophages. Importantly, administration of the UBC9 inhibitor 2-D08 promoted the antitumor effect of TAMs and increased the expression of PD-1 on CD8+ T cells, supporting a synergistic antitumor efficacy once it combined with the immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Together, our results demonstrate that ablation of UBC9 could reverse the immunosuppressive phenotype of TAMs by promoting STAT4-mediated macrophage activation and macrophage-CD8+ T cell crosstalk, which provides valuable insights to halt the pathogenic process of tumorigenesis.


Assuntos
Ativação de Macrófagos , Neoplasias da Próstata , Animais , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos , Ativação de Macrófagos/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Microambiente Tumoral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...