RESUMO
A previous paper [Weston et al. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 4274-4284] by our group concluded that to distinguish between the wettability of different particles, heat of immersion is the best method, as opposed to the Washburn or sessile drop method. In this paper, heats of immersion of three different particles with three different wettabilities are measured at different temperatures to examine one critical assumption concerning the temperature dependence of the heat of immersion. In addition, surfactants are added to the water, and the effect of surfactant concentration on the heat of immersion is measured. One particularly noteworthy aspect of the current study is that some measurements were made at temperatures greater than 100 °C and hence pressures higher than atmospheric pressure with no more difficulty than measurements made at atmospheric pressure. The previous paper showed that, for certain particles, the relationship used by us and others between the heat of immersion and contact angle gave impossible values for certain surfaces. In this paper, the derivation of that expression is reexamined, and certain assumptions are highlighted. Because of issues with the assumptions, we agree with the conclusion from our previous paper that using the heat of immersion as a qualitative measure of wetting is appropriate. However, without measurement of the values of the liquid-solid interfacial energy with temperature as well as the gas-solid interfacial energy with temperature, conversion to the contact angle directly is not appropriate. However, for the same surface, using this approach to quantify the contact angle as a function of temperature is likely appropriate if the contact angle is measured using some other method at one temperature, at least over the limited temperature range (up to 150 °C) explored in this study.
