RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Endotracheal intubation is an essential skill for the pediatric airway management. Although direct laryngoscopy (DL) is the standard method, several videolaryngoscopes (VLs) have been recently enhanced as an alternative especially for difficult intubations. We aimed to compare McGrath MAC (McG) and Storz C-MAC PM (ST) VLs with DL in terms of intubation success rate, time to intubation (TTI), and duration of obtaining glottis view of intubation attempts performed by pediatric residents on different pediatric airway manikins. METHODS: The pediatric residents with no experience in videolaryngoscopy were included. After a brief demonstration, intubation attempts with 3 randomly handled different devices with 6 different blades were performed on a child manikin, an infant manikin, a Pierre-Robin sequence infant manikin, and a child manikin with cervical immobilization sequentially. RESULTS: Fifty pediatric residents were enrolled. The attempts of DL on child manikin and attempts of all devices on child with cervical immobilization simulation were completely successful. For the attempts on both infant manikin and Pierre-Robin sequence infant manikin, the success rate of McG was significantly lower than ST and DL (P = 0.011 and P = 0.001). In the child manikin, McG and ST had prolonged TTI compared with DL (P = 0.016 and P = 0.001). For the child with cervical immobilization simulation, TTI of DL was significantly shorter than McG and ST (P = 0.011 and P = 0.001). Time to intubation of McG was significantly longer than DL and ST for the attempts on both 2 infant manikins. The rate of Cormack-Lehane grade I glottis view was similar for the attempts on both 2 child airway simulations. For infant manikin and Pierre-Robin sequence infant simulation, the rate of Cormack-Lehane grade I of ST was higher than attempts of DL and McG. CONCLUSIONS: The attempts of pediatric residents on infant normal airway and Pierre-Robin sequence infant airway simulations resulted with enhanced glottis view by the utilization of Storz C-MAC PM, but both 2 VLs did not provide the improvement of intubation success rate and TTI compared with DL on these 4 different pediatric manikins. Further clinical studies of different VLs in different clinical courses are required for a reliable utilization in children.
