Effectiveness of tacrolimus concomitant with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and tolerance of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) therapy administered concomitantly with tacrolimus (TAC) treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: 2792 patients who underwent therapy with five bDMARDs (etanercept: ETN, adalimumab, golimumab, tocilizumab, and abatacept: ABT) were enrolled. Among the study subjects, 1582 were concomitant methotrexate (MTX group), 147 were concomitant TAC (TAC group), and 1063 were non-concomitant MTX and TAC (non-MTX/TAC group). The primary outcome was the incident rate of discontinuation of bDMARDs by adverse events (AEs) or loss of efficacy. RESULTS: Concerning the analysis for each reasons of discontinuation, including AEs and loss of efficacy, the hazards ratio (HR) was significantly lower in the TAC group than in non-MTX/TAC groups (AEs: HR = 0.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.68, loss of efficacy: HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.78). The loss of efficacy with the use of ETN and ABT was lower in the TAC group than in non-MTX/TAC groups. Concomitant TAC did not induce elevated risk for discontinuation of AEs in all bDMARD analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant TAC with ABT or ETN showed higher retention rates than bDMARDs therapy without TAC or MTX. AEs did not increase over long-term observation.

Reasons and risk factors for discontinuation of treatment with any biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A long-term observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) usually switch to a second biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) when the first has proven to be ineffective, although some may discontinue bDMARDs treatment altogether. We investigated the total rate of bDMARDs retention and the risk of bDMARDs discontinuation in patients with RA. METHODS: The study included 564 patients with RA who started bDMARDs treatment before 2008 (<65 years old, n = 413; ≥65, n = 151). The primary outcome was the incidence of bDMARDs discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Risk factors were examined using Fine and Gray regression models. RESULTS: Among 564 patients, 74 had discontinued bDMARDs treatment due to AEs. Male sex and Steinbrocker class 3-4 were more frequent, while rheumatoid factor and concomitant methotrexate treatment were less frequent, in those aged ≥65 years than in those aged <65 years, respectively. The subdistribution hazard ratio for discontinuation was significantly higher in the ≥65 group than in the <65 years group (hazard ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval = 2.07-6.03). Lack of concomitant treatment with MTX was risk factor for discontinuation in patients ≥65 years. Advanced Steinbrocker class was a risk factor in patients <65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients are at higher risk of discontinuing bDMARDs treatment due to AEs than younger patients.

Comparison of the effects of baricitinib and tocilizumab on disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, and tocilizumab, a monoclonal anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, on disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to investigate the influence of inflammation on improvement in patient global assessment (PGA) of disease activity. METHODS: This study was performed based on data from a multicenter registry, and included 284 and 113 patients treated with tocilizumab and baricitinib, respectively, who were observed for longer than 24 weeks. Propensity score matching was performed to address potential treatment-selection bias. To assess the influence of inflammation on PGA, patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they achieved improvement in C-reactive protein (CRP, an objective marker of inflammation) at 24 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 48 matched pairs of patients were identified. Compared to treatment with tocilizumab, baricitinib showed a similar improvement in tender and swollen joint count and serum CRP levels, and a significantly greater improvement in PGA at 24 weeks. As a result, the baricitinib group had a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved Boolean remission at 24 weeks. In subgroups of patients who did not achieve 50% or 70% CRP improvement, significant decreases from baseline to 24 weeks were observed in PGA in patients treated with baricitinib, but not in those treated with tocilizumab. CONCLUSION: Compared to tocilizumab, baricitinib significantly improved PGA despite similar effects on inflammation in patients with RA. Moreover, the influence of inflammation on PGA improvement differed between baricitinib and tocilizumab. Key-points • Baricitinib and tocilizumab had similar effects on inflammation in RA patients. • Baricitinib improved patient global assessment (PGA) more than tocilizumab. • Baricitinib had a higher Boolean remission rate than tocilizumab at 24 weeks. • Influence of inflammation on PGA improvement differed between the two drugs.

Higher doses of methotrexate associated with discontinuation of oral glucocorticoids after initiation of biological DMARDs: A retrospective observational study based on data from a Japanese multicenter registry study.

OBJECTIVE: Glucocorticoids are important drugs used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. We recommend glucocorticoid discontinuation as soon as possible given the associated side-effects, but many patients continue to take oral glucocorticoids long-term. The present study aimed to explore factors associated with glucocorticoid discontinuation at 52 weeks after initiating biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS: Subjects were 564 patients from a Japanese multicenter registry who were administered glucocorticoids and methotrexate (MTX) followed by initiation of the first bDMARD. We examined the status of oral glucocorticoid use at 52 weeks after initiating the first bDMARD. RESULTS: By 52 weeks after bDMARD initiation, 164 patients (29.1%) discontinued glucocorticoids. Multivariable analysis identified age, MTX dose, and glucocorticoid dose as factors independently associated with glucocorticoid discontinuation. After adjusting for baseline characteristics using propensity score matching, among patient groups administered MTX ≤ 8 mg/week and MTX > 8 mg/week, 105 pairs remained. A significantly higher rate of glucocorticoid discontinuation (41.0%) was noted for patients administered MTX > 8 mg/week. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that glucocorticoids may be discontinued after initiating bDMARDs. Moreover, higher MTX doses (>8 mg/week) at the time of bDMARD initiation were associated with glucocorticoid discontinuation among patients treated with bDMARDs.

Predictors for clinical effectiveness of baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients in routine clinical practice: data from a Japanese multicenter registry.

This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effectiveness and safety profiles of baricitinib and explore factors associated with improved short-term effectiveness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical settings. A total of 113 consecutive RA patients who had been treated with baricitinib were registered in a Japanese multicenter registry and followed for at least 24 weeks. Mean age was 66.1 years, mean RA disease duration was 14.0 years, 71.1% had a history of use of biologics or JAK inhibitors (targeted DMARDs), and 48.3% and 40.0% were receiving concomitant methotrexate and oral prednisone, respectively. Mean DAS28-CRP significantly decreased from 3.55 at baseline to 2.32 at 24 weeks. At 24 weeks, 68.2% and 64.1% of patients achieved low disease activity (LDA) and moderate or good response, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that no previous targeted DMARD use and lower DAS28-CRP score at baseline were independently associated with achievement of LDA at 24 weeks. While the effectiveness of baricitinib was similar regardless of whether patients had a history of only one or multiple targeted DMARDs use, patients with previous use of non-TNF inhibitors or JAK inhibitors showed lower rates of improvement in DAS28-CRP. The overall retention rate for baricitinib was 86.5% at 24 weeks, as estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 6.5% at 24 weeks. Baricitinib significantly improved RA disease activity in clinical practice. Baricitinib was significantly more effective when used as a first-line targeted DMARDs.

A retrospective analysis of the relationship between anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and the effectiveness of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) by anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA) status on disease activity as well as radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical settings. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a multicenter registry. Data from a total of 553 consecutive RA patients treated with intravenous ABA were included. We primarily compared the status of disease activity (SDAI) and radiographic progression (van der Heijde modified total Sharp score: mTSS) between the ACPA-negative (N = 107) and ACPA-positive (N = 446) groups. 'ACPA positive' was defined as ≥ 13.5 U/mL of anti-CCP antibody. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar. The proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA; SDAI ≤ 11) at 52 weeks was significantly higher in the ACPA-positive group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified ACPA positivity as an independent predictor for achievement of LDA at 52 weeks. Drug retention rate at 52 weeks estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve was significantly higher in the ACPA-positive group. Achievement rate of structural remission (ΔmTSS ≤ 0.5) at 52 weeks was similar between groups. ABA treatment demonstrated a significantly higher clinical response and higher drug retention rate in ACPA-positive patients. Progression of joint destruction was similar between the ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive groups. Close attention should be paid to joint destruction even in patients showing a favorable response to ABA, especially when the ACPA status is positive.

Predictors of disease flare after discontinuation of concomitant methotrexate in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate predictors of disease flare after methotrexate discontinuation in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with sustained low disease activity undergoing tocilizumab plus methotrexate combination therapy. METHODS: Participants of this multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, prospective study were RA patients maintaining low disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI]≤10) for≥12weeks with tocilizumab plus methotrexate. Methotrexate was discontinued after 12weeks of biweekly administration while continuing tocilizumab therapy. Disease flare was defined as either a CDAI score>10 or intervention with rescue treatments for any reason even if the CDAI score was≤10. The impact of baseline characteristics on disease flare at week 64 (52weeks after methotrexate discontinuation) was assessed with logistic regression models. RESULTS: Efficacy analyses were performed in 49 patients, of whom 15 had a disease flare by week 64. The proportion (95% confidence interval [CI]) of patients who maintained low disease activity without a flare at week 64 was 69.4% (54.6-81.8%). The dosing interval of tocilizumab was longer than that described on the drug label in Japan (i.e., intravenously every 4weeks, or subcutaneously every 2weeks) in 27% and 6% of patients with and without a flare, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex (odds ratio [OR]: 18.00, 95% CI: 2.80-115.56) and extended dosing interval of tocilizumab (OR: 12.00, 95% CI: 1.72-83.80) were independent predictors of disease flare. CONCLUSION: Male patients and those receiving tocilizumab at an extended dosing interval are at high risk of disease flare after discontinuation of concomitant methotrexate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs041180071, UMIN000021247.

Improvement in matrix metalloproteinase-3 independently predicts low disease activity at 52 weeks in bio-switch rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept.

OBJECTIVES: To explore predictive factors including MMP-3 for achievement of low disease activity (LDA) at 52 weeks in bio-switch rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with abatacept, for whom obtaining a good clinical response can be difficult. METHODS: Participants were 423 consecutive patients with RA treated with abatacept who were observed for longer than 52 weeks and registered in the TBCR, a Japanese multicentre registry system. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study factors that predict the achievement of LDA at 52 weeks in bio-naïve (n=234) and bio-switch (n=189) groups. RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed that MMP-3 improvement rates at 12 weeks in bio-switch patients had the highest AUC with a cut-off value of 20.0% for predicting LDA achievement at 52 weeks. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, in addition to DAS28-CRP at baseline, achieving 20% improvement in MMP-3 levels at 12 weeks was an independent predictive factor (adjusted OR: 4.277, p=0.003) in the bio-switch group, whereas DAS28 was the only predictor in the bio-naïve group. Patients who achieved 20% improvement in MMP-3 levels at 12 weeks had significantly higher achievement rates of LDA at 52 weeks compared to those who did not achieve 20% improvement in the bio-switch group (60.0 vs. 33.3%, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that improvement in MMP-3 levels is key to predicting the clinical efficacy of abatacept. Closer attention paid not only to major clinical indices, but also changes in MMP-3 levels, could improve our ability to optimise clinical results when treating bio-switch patients.

Discontinuation of concomitant methotrexate in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab: An interventional study.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) discontinuation in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with sustained low disease activity undergoing combination therapy with tocilizumab (TCZ) plus MTX.Methods: This multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, prospective study included RA patients maintaining low disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤10) for ≥12 weeks with TCZ plus MTX. Methotrexate was discontinued following 12 weeks of biweekly administration while continuing TCZ therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients maintaining low disease activity with no flare at week 36.Results: A total of 49 patients completed 36 weeks of therapy. The proportion of patients maintaining low disease activity at week 36 was 75.5%. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval exceeded the assumed threshold response rate of 60%, demonstrating the clinical feasibility of MTX discontinuation. The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, defined as a Frequency Scale for Symptoms of Gastroesophageal reflux disease score ≥8, significantly decreased from week 0 to 12 (27.1-18.4%; p= .025).Conclusion: Discontinuation of concomitant MTX is clinically feasible for maintaining low disease activity, and may be beneficial from the perspective of reducing gastrointestinal symptoms in Japanese RA patients treated with TCZ. Trial registration number: UMIN000021247.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of additional administration of tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to abatacept: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Abatacept (ABT) demonstrates good clinical efficacy and retention in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, no rescue treatment option against inadequate response to ABT exists. Since tacrolimus (TAC) and ABT suppress T lymphocytes via different mechanisms and a combination of these agents could potentially be effective, this study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of add-on TAC therapy in RA patients with inadequate response to ABT. METHODS: Of 550 patients treated with ABT and registered in a Japanese multicenter registry, 25 consecutive patients who underwent add-on TAC therapy and were followed for longer than 24 weeks were included in this study. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 67.0 years, disease duration was 16.2 years, and duration of ABT treatment was 1.2 years at the initiation of add-on TAC therapy. Mean TAC dose was 1.2 mg/d at baseline and 1.6 mg/d at week 24. Mean Disease Activity Score of 28 joints - erythrocyte sedimentation rate was significantly improved at week 24 (3.35) relative to baseline (4.97). The proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity or remission was 40.0%, and the European League Against Rheumatism moderate or good response was 72.0%. ABT retention rate was 92.0% at week 24, as calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Only one patient discontinued add-on TAC therapy due to an adverse event (itching sensation). CONCLUSION: This is the first report describing the efficacy and safety profile of add-on TAC therapy with a focus on RA patients with inadequate response to ABT. Our findings suggest that add-on TAC therapy is a worthwhile complementary treatment option in daily clinical practice.

Association between seropositivity and discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors due to ineffectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Discontinuation of biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis is attributable to various reasons, with the most important cause being insufficient response. In this study, we investigated the association between rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibody (ACPA) status and the discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) therapy due to insufficient response in bio-naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHOD: This study included patients enrolled in the Tsurumai Biologic Communication Registry in Japan. The crude comparison of TNFi discontinuation due to ineffectiveness between seropositive and seronegative patients was analyzed using the cumulative incidence function of competing events and Gray test. We assessed the associations between baseline patient characteristics and discontinuation of TNFi therapy due to insufficient response using Fine-Gray proportional hazard regression. Fine-Gray proportional hazard analysis considered competing events of interest, including insufficient response, adverse event, palliation, and personal reasons. RESULTS: Of 1237 patients evaluated, 79.3% were positive for RF and 85.4% for ACPA; 72.6% were double positive and 11.1% were double negative. TNFi therapy had been discontinued because of insufficient response at 200 weeks in 19.8% RF-positive, 16.7% RF-negative, 23.0% ACPA-positive, and 13.8% ACPA-negative patients. There was a significantly higher discontinuation rate due to insufficient response in ACPA-positive patients than in ACPA-negative patients using Gray test, with a similar trend as that for RF status. RF positivity was significantly predictive of the discontinuation of TNFi therapy due to ineffectiveness using Fine-Gray proportional hazard regression analysis after adjusting for baseline characteristics, including age, sex, stage, class, disease activity at baseline, methotrexate use, and prednisolone use [hazard ratio 1.73 (95% confidence interval 1.07-2.80)]. CONCLUSIONS: Using Fine-Gray proportional hazard regression, we demonstrated that RF positivity was related to a higher discontinuation rate of TNFi therapy due to ineffectiveness in bio-naïve RA patients. Key Points • RF positivity is related to a higher discontinuation rate of TNFi therapy due to ineffectiveness. • ACPA is not predictive of a discontinuation of TNFi therapy due to ineffectiveness.

Concomitant methotrexate has little effect on clinical outcomes of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis: a propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of abatacept between rheumatoid arthritis patients with and without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment in daily clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a multicentre registry. A total of 176 consecutive rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept were included. The propensity score based on multiple baseline characteristic variables was calculated, and 41 of 86 patients treated without MTX (MTX(-)) and 41 of 90 patients treated with concomitant MTX (MTX(+)) were statistically extracted and analysed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups over a 52-week period. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were statistically comparable. No significant differences were observed in the following clinical outcomes from baseline throughout the 52-week period: drug retention rate (MTX(-)/MTX(+) 79.1%/80.5%), mean change in disease activity score based on 28 joints (DAS28-CRP) from baseline (- 1.35/- 1.54), low disease activity rate (48.8%/43.9%), clinical remission rate (31.7%/36.6%), moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response rate (68.3%/68.3%), and good EULAR response rate (36.6%/41.1%) at 52 weeks. CONCLUSION: In rheumatoid arthritis patients with similar background characteristics undergoing abatacept treatment, concomitant MTX does not seem to affect clinical outcomes. Abatacept would be a suitable treatment option in daily clinical practice in patients with contraindications to MTX. KEY POINTS: • This is the first study to directly compare the clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept between patients with and without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment in 'real-world' settings using the propensity score matching method. • There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes of abatacept between patients with and without concomitant MTX treatment. • We used data from a large Japanese multicentre registry for biologics in rheumatoid arthritis, thereby decreasing selection bias based on the personal preferences of physicians.

Clinical effectiveness and long-term retention of abatacept in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients: Results from a multicenter registry system.

Objective: To study the clinical effectiveness and long-term retention rate of abatacept (ABA) in elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in daily clinical practice.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a multicenter registry. Our study population comprised 500 consecutive RA patients treated with ABA. We compared clinical effectiveness and ABA retention rates between the Young (≤62 years), Middle (62 to 72 years), and Elderly (≥72 years) groups. We also performed separate examinations to identify predictive factors for ABA discontinuation in those with versus those without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment.Results: Mean age was 52.7 years in the Young group, 67.7 years in the Middle group, and 78.1 years in the Elderly group. No significant group-dependent differences were found in mean DAS28 score, categorical distribution of DAS28, and EULAR response rate across the 52 weeks. The ABA retention rates at three years as determined by the Kaplan-Meier method were similar in all three groups. Patient age was not a significant predictor of ABA discontinuation due to adverse events in patients with concomitant MTX; however, it was found to be a significant predictor for those who did not use MTX (Cox hazard model).Conclusion: ABA would be a reasonable treatment option for elderly RA patients from the viewpoints of both clinical effectiveness and long-term retention. However, physicians should watch carefully for any serious adverse reactions in elderly RA patients with intolerance to MTX.

High rate of improvement in serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 levels at 4 weeks predicts remission at 52 weeks in RA patients treated with adalimumab.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) levels can predict remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with adalimumab (ADA). METHODS: Subjects were 114 RA patients continuously treated with ADA for 52 weeks. Predictive factors at baseline and 4 weeks after initiation of ADA therapy for the achievement of remission (28-point count Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) < 2.3) at 52 weeks were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: DAS28-CRP at 4 weeks (odds ratio (OR) 0.614, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.382-0.988) and improvement in serum MMP-3 levels at 4 weeks (OR 1.057, 95% CI 1.002-1.032) were independent predictors of remission at 52 weeks. The best cut-off level of DAS28-CRP and improvement in serum MMP-3 levels at 4 weeks for predicting remission at 52 weeks was 3.73 (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 50%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 62%) and 39.93% (sensitivity: 47%, specificity: 83%, AUC: 64%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a high rate of improvement in serum MMP-3 levels at 4 weeks after initiation of ADA therapy can predict remission at 52 weeks in RA patients.

Predictors of biologic discontinuation due to insufficient response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who achieved clinical remission with biologic treatment: A multicenter observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate predictors of biologic discontinuation due to insufficient response as a surrogate for relapse in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved clinical remission with biologic treatment. METHODS: This study was performed based on data from a multicenter registry, and included 404 patients who achieved clinical remission within the first year of treatment with their first biologic. Cumulative retention rate of the first biologic was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the impact of patient characteristics on biologic discontinuation was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: During follow-up, 50 patients discontinued their first biologic due to insufficient response. Overall discontinuation rates due to insufficient response after achieving remission were 6%, 11%, and 19% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant glucocorticoids at achieving remission [hazard ratio (HR): 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89-7.64)] and a higher level of C-reactive protein (CRP) at achieving remission (HR: 1.47 per 1 mg/dL, 95% CI: 1.09-1.99) independently predict discontinuation due to insufficient response after achieving remission. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA who achieved remission with concomitant glucocorticoid treatment and a higher level of CRP are at high risk of subsequent biologic discontinuation due to insufficient response.

Longterm Retention Rate and Risk Factors for Adalimumab Discontinuation Due To Efficacy and Safety in Japanese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Observational Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rates of retention and discontinuation of adalimumab (ADA) due to efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: All patients with RA (n = 476) who were treated with ADA in the Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry were enrolled. RESULTS: The retention rate of ADA was 46% at 5 years. When focusing on insufficient efficacy, previous biologics use and high baseline disease activity were significant risk factors for up to 1 year. Methotrexate (MTX) use was a significantly low risk factor after 1 year of treatment. CONCLUSION: Concomitant MTX contributes to the longterm efficacy of ADA therapy.

Improved safety of biologic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis over the 8-year period since implementation in Japan: long-term results from a multicenter observational cohort study.

This study aimed to compare the long-term safety of biologics by initiation year of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan. RA patients who started their first biologics including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and tocilizumab between 2003 and 2008 were identified in the Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry (TBCR), multicenter observational cohort, and followed for 2 years or until discontinuation of the drugs. We identified baseline predictors for adverse events (AEs) resulting in discontinuation of the first TNFI using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. A total of 874 cases (1,340 person-years) were observed. During the observation period, 96 AEs (4.7 events/100 person-years) occurred. From 2003 to 2008, there were significant changes in disease duration, Steinbrocker stage, and disease activity in those aged ≤64 years with no increase of incidence of AEs, whereas those aged >64 years had no significant changes in these variables. In the later initiation year of treatment with biologics, the fewer AEs were observed (log-rank, p = 0.017, 2008 vs. 2003-2005). Multivariate analysis showed that the initiation year significantly impacted the incidence of AEs 6 months into the observation period [initiation at 2008 (vs. 2003-2005): OR: 0.30, 95 % CI: (0.14-0.68)] after adjusting for variables at baseline. The decrease of AEs in the later initiation year was evident in those aged >64 years. The safety of biologic therapy improved over the course of the 8 years from its implementation in Japan.

Predictive factors for achieving low disease activity at 52 weeks after switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitors to abatacept: results from a multicenter observational cohort study of Japanese patients.

This study aimed to identify predictive factors for achieving low disease activity (LDA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) to abatacept (ABT). Patients who were registered in the multicenter observational Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry (TBCR) were enrolled in this study. Predictive factors for LDA achievement at each time point were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The cutoffs of 28-point count Disease Activity Score (DAS28)-C-reactive protein (CRP) and ΔDAS28-CRP from baseline up to 24 weeks for LDA achievement at 52 weeks were explored using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Of 2771 RA patients registered until 2013, 76 with moderate or high disease activity were selected. Twenty-six percent of the patients achieved LDA. Multivariate analysis confirmed that DAS28-CRP at 12 weeks and ΔDAS28-CRP from baseline to 12 weeks were independent factors for LDA achievement at 52 weeks [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% confident interval (CI) (0.12-0.56), OR 0.25, 95% CI (0.11-0.57), respectively]. The best cutoff values of DAS28-CRP at 12 weeks and ΔDAS28-CRP from baseline to 12 weeks for LDA at 52 weeks were 3.9 (sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.78) and -0.97 (sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.70), respectively. Seventy-one percent of patients who achieved both of these cutoff values at 12 weeks achieved LDA at 52 weeks. Our findings suggest that the clinical course up to 12 weeks is important for predicting long-term outcomes when switching from TNFis to ABT.

Concomitant methotrexate and tacrolimus augment the clinical response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with a prior history of biological DMARD use.

This observational retrospective study examined whether abatacept efficacy could be augmented with concomitant methotrexate (MTX) or tacrolimus (TAC) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who experienced failure with prior biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and in whom favorable therapeutic efficacy is difficult to achieve. All patients with a prior biological DMARD history who were treated with abatacept for 52 weeks and registered in a Japanese multicentre registry were included. Clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept according to the concomitant drug used, i.e., none (ABT-mono), MTX (ABT-MTX), and TAC (ABT-TAC), were compared. A greater mean percent change of DAS28-ESR was observed in the ABT-TAC group compared with the ABT-mono group at weeks 12 (-20.5 vs. -5.4 %, p = 0.035) and 24 (-25.0 vs. -11.0 %, p = 0.036). ABT-MTX and ABT-TAC groups had a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA) within 52 weeks compared with the respective baselines, while no significant change was observed in the ABT-mono group. A higher proportion of patients in the ABT-TAC group achieved EULAR moderate response compared with the ABT-mono group at week 52 (66.7 vs. 35.0 %, p = 0.025). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that concomitant TAC use was independently associated with the achievement of LDA and EULAR response at 52 weeks, while concomitant MTX use was not. Concomitant TAC use may offer a suitable option for RA patients treated with abatacept after prior biological DMARD failure, likely because both abatacept and TAC affect T cell activation.

Effects of Concomitant Methotrexate on Large Joint Replacement in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) on the incidence of large joint replacement resulting from the progression of large joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using a multicenter registry. In total, 803 patients with RA who received etanercept or adalimumab were included. The first large joint replacement during treatment with etanercept or adalimumab was used as the outcome variable in predictive analyses. The cumulative incidence of large joint replacement was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the impact of concomitant MTX on the incidence of large joint replacement was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Of all patients, 601 (75%) received concomitant MTX at a median dosage of 8 mg/week (interquartile range 6-8). A total of 49 patients (62 joints) underwent large joint replacement during treatment with etanercept or adalimumab. The incidence of large joint replacement for patients with concomitant MTX was significantly lower than that for patients without MTX (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant MTX independently predicted large joint replacement (hazard ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.65). Additionally, propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated that patients with concomitant MTX had a significantly lower incidence of large joint replacement than those without concomitant MTX (P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Concomitant MTX reduces the incidence of large joint replacement in patients with RA treated with TNF inhibitors.