A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Prophylactic Manuka Honey for the Reduction of Chemoradiation Therapy-Induced Esophagitis During the Treatment of Lung Cancer: Results of NRG Oncology RTOG 1012.

PURPOSE: Randomized trials have shown that honey is effective for the prevention of radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. Because there is no efficacious preventative for radiation esophagitis in lung cancer patients, this trial compared liquid honey, honey lozenges, and standard supportive care for radiation esophagitis. METHODS: The patients were stratified by percentage of esophagus receiving specific radiation dose (V60 Gy esophagus <30% or ≥30%) and were then randomized between supportive care, 10 mL of liquid manuka honey 4 times a day, and 2 lozenges (10 mL of dehydrated manuka honey) 4 times a day during concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was patient-reported pain on swallowing, with the use of an 11-point (0-10) scale at 4 weeks (Numerical Rating Pain Scale, NRPS). The study was designed to detect a 15% relative reduction of change in NRPS score. The secondary endpoints were trend of pain over time, opioid use, clinically graded and patient-reported adverse events, weight loss, dysphagia, nutritional status, and quality of life. RESULTS: 53 patients were randomized to supportive care, 54 were randomized to liquid honey, and 56 were randomized to lozenge honey. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of change in the NRPS at 4 weeks between arms. There were no differences in any of the secondary endpoints except for opioid use at 4 weeks during treatment between the supportive care and liquid honey arms, which was found to be significant (P=.03), with more patients on the supportive care arm taking opioids. CONCLUSION: Honey as prescribed within this protocol was not superior to best supportive care in preventing radiation esophagitis. Further testing of other types of honey and research into the mechanisms of action are needed.

Interstitial brachytherapy for salvage treatment of vaginal recurrences in previously unirradiated endometrial cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether interstitial brachytherapy can effectively salvage vaginal recurrence from endometrial carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 1989 and September 2000, 13 previously unirradiated patients (mean age 70 years) with isolated vaginal recurrences from endometrial adenocarcinoma were treated with interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without additional external beam radiotherapy. Brachytherapy was delivered using a modified perineal Syed template loaded with (192)Ir. The central cylinder was loaded with high-activity (192)Ir (n = 12) or (137)Cs (n = 1). RESULTS: The patients had initially presented with FIGO Stage I (n = 11) or III (n = 2) cancer. Vaginal recurrences were diagnosed at a mean interval of 27.5 months after hysterectomy (range 2-83). The patients were followed for a median of 60 months (range 15-105). Ten patients had recurrence at the vaginal apex and three had recurrence in the lower two-thirds of the vagina. The median time to recurrence was 22 months. The tumor size ranged from 1.5 to 6 cm (mean 2.2, median 2.5). Eleven of 13 patients received 45-50-Gy pelvic external beam radiotherapy, followed by a mean interstitial brachytherapy boost of 28.3 Gy (range 18-35). The 2 other patients received brachytherapy only of 40 Gy and 50 Gy, respectively. All tumors were locally controlled. Three (23%) of 13 patients had a relapse at distant sites (two in the paraaortic region and one in the liver). The overall 8-year actuarial disease-specific survival rate was 77%. Major (Grade 3 and 4) long-term morbidity occurred in 2 patients (15%) and included Grade 3 vaginal ulceration in 1 patient, and Grade 4 colovesical fistula requiring surgical intervention in 1 patient. Additional long-term morbidity included Grade 2 proctitis in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Interstitial brachytherapy with or without supplementary external beam radiotherapy can effectively salvage vaginal recurrence from endometrial cancer with very favorable local control and overall survival and acceptable morbidity.