A case of nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor with atypical imaging findings due to prominent fibrosis of the tumor stroma.

The patient, a 56-year-old woman, was found during routine checkup to have a disorder of hepatic function. Abdominal ultrasonography showed an ill-defined hypoechoic mass in the head and body of the pancreas; however, no blood-flow signal was observed within the tumor on Doppler ultrasonography. Abdominal computed tomography showed a low-density area in the arterial and portal venous phases. The lesion was visualized as an area of low signal intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images, whereas fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography showed fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in the tumor. Although a preoperative diagnosis was difficult to make, a rapid cytologic examination revealed evidence of a pancreatic endocrine tumor, and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection was performed. Histopathological examination showed tumor cell nests scattered in abundant fibrotic tissue; the tumor cells had proliferated in a cord-like fashion and showed immunostaining for chromogranin A. Staining for fibroblast activation protein α was seen in the fibroblastic cells contained within the fibrous stroma surrounding the tumor cell nests, whereas both the fibroblastic cells in the tumor and those in the stroma showed a high rate of staining for thrombospondin. We presume that tumor-associated fibroblasts were involved in the fibrosis of the tumor stroma.

T tube drainage for spontaneous perforation of the extrahepatic bile duct.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous perforation of the extrahepatic bile duct is very rare. We report a patient with a spontaneous perforation of the left hepatic bile duct who was diagnosed preoperatively. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital complaining of a right upper quadrant pain lasting for two days. She was diagnosed as having a perforated bile duct and peritonitis and underwent a laparotomy. After a cholecystectomy, T-tube drainage of the left hepatic duct was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. The T tube was removed 25 days after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A more noninvasive procedure, such as endoscopic treatment, should play a central role in the management of extra bile duct perforation. For this case, however, we chose to perform a laparotomy based on the patient's general condition and the presence of peritonitis. T tube decompression is effective and a safe and reliable method. The goal of treatment is to stop the bile leakage, resolve the choledocholithiasis and cholangitis, and reconstruct the bile duct.