Duration of viral shedding and factors associated with prolonged shedding among inpatients with influenza treated with oseltamivir: a prospective cohort study.

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of decline in the diagnostic yield of influenza PCR assay after oseltamivir administration, and to identify risk factors for prolonged shedding. This was a prospective observational study. We included adult inpatients with clinical signs of influenza during the influenza seasons 2015 and 2016, who had positive influenza PCR tests and who were treated with oseltamivir. Clinical follow-up and repeat PCR testing were performed on days 2, 4 and 6 after the first positive test. We defined prolonged shedders as patients who still required hospitalization and had a positive PCR assay on day 4. Risk factors for prolonged shedding were assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 215 patients were included in our study. The median age was 64 years and 49.3% were men. The main influenza type was H1N1 (50.1%). Rates of PCR positivity among evaluable patients on days 2, 4 and 6 were 142/215 (66%), 50/78 (64.1%) and 20/30 (66.6%), respectively. Independent risk factors for prolonged shedding (50 patients) included hypoxemia [odds ratio (OR) 2.55, 95% confidence interval (1.3-5.1)] and lower diastolic blood pressure [OR 0.94, 95% CI (0.92-0.97)] on admission. Negative PCR tests taken more than 48 h after initiation of treatment had low diagnostic yield. More severe disease, manifested by hypoxemia and lower blood pressure, is associated with prolonged shedding on oseltamivir treatment.

Pros and cons of circumcision: an evidence-based overview.

Based on three large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in Africa, it can clearly be stated that circumcision lowers the risk of infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and some sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among males in settings of high HIV and STI endemicity. Similar effects on STI risk may exist for females, although this may result from an indirect effect of decreasing risk of infection among male partners. It is unknown whether circumcision prevents HIV acquisition in men who have sex with men (MSM), although there might be a protective effect for men who engage mainly in insertive anal intercourse. When the effects of adult circumcision on sexual function and satisfaction of men are examined, high-quality evidence strongly supports lack of harm. Whether circumcision alters sexual satisfaction of female partners is not known as fewer and smaller studies reported conflicting results. Circumcision rarely causes serious complications if practiced by trained practitioners, in a sterile setting, and with a proper follow-up. These conclusions are limited by the lack of high-quality data from areas outside of Africa. RCTs have not been conducted to assess the effects of circumcising infants or MSM. Circumcision has well-proven benefits for people residing in areas with high prevalence of STIs, including HIV, and is not unethical for those who choose to be circumcised or have their children circumcised on religious, social, or cultural grounds. For many others, a definite pro or con recommendation, based on a risk-benefit ratio, cannot be made.