Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Intern Med J ; 46(7): 834-9, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27130246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Insulin-induced weight gain is a key concern for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and their treatment team. This study aimed to document the prevalence of insulin-induced weight gain and its impact on cardiovascular risk factors in patients attending the Royal Melbourne Hospital diabetes clinic. METHODS: Clinical and biochemical data were extracted from a prospective clinic database and from the hospital record. These variables were correlated with the percentage weight change 1 year after starting insulin and compared between groups with or without clinically significant weight gain, defined as more than 7% of the baseline bodyweight. RESULTS: The population comprised 340 patients (184 male), representing 36% of people with T2D who commenced insulin at our clinic. Their mean ± SD age and duration of diabetes was 63 ± 11 and 13 ± 8 years respectively. The mean (95% CI) change in bodyweight at 1 year was 3.0 (2.5-3.5) kg, but this was not associated with deleterious changes in blood pressure or lipid profile. Weight gain was associated with higher insulin doses, the use of short-acting insulin and with lower baseline bodyweight. Clinically significant weight gain occurred in 87 patients and was associated with glucose-lowering regimens that included short-acting insulin or a thiazolidinedione, whereas regimens that incorporated other oral agents, particularly sulfonylureas, were associated with less weight gain. CONCLUSION: In this Australian tertiary hospital population with T2D, insulin-induced weight gain was common but was not associated with deleterious changes in blood pressure or lipids. Treatment regimens that avoid short-acting insulin but include oral agents other than thiazolidinediones might prevent insulin-induced weight gain in T2D.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Insulina/efeitos adversos , Aumento de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Austrália , Glicemia/análise , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Atenção Terciária
3.
Br Med J ; 4(5730): 281-2, 1970 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4920226

RESUMO

A comparison of tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole showed that all hasten the eradication of Vibrio cholerae from the stools of patients with cholera.A four-day period of tetracycline or trimethoprim/ sulphamethoxazole was adequate for eradicating V. cholerae from the stools of all patients, but three days, as suggested by the W.H.O. Expert Committee, was not. Four days of chloramphenicol therapy was sufficient for most patients, but a minority required up to seven days' therapy.Purging produced reappearance of V. cholerae in the stools of one-eighth of the patients who had had three successive daily negative stool cultures; such patients are a potential danger to the population.


Assuntos
Cloranfenicol/uso terapêutico , Cólera/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas do Ácido Fólico/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Tetraciclina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Catárticos/administração & dosagem , Criança , Cólera/microbiologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , Placebos , Vibrio/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...