An affective disorder in zebrafish with mutation of the glucocorticoid receptor.

Upon binding of cortisol, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) regulates the transcription of specific target genes, including those that encode the stress hormones corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone. Dysregulation of the stress axis is a hallmark of major depression in human patients. However, it is still unclear how glucocorticoid signaling is linked to affective disorders. We identified an adult-viable zebrafish mutant in which the negative feedback on the stress response is disrupted, due to abolition of all transcriptional activity of GR. As a consequence, cortisol is elevated, but unable to signal through GR. When placed into an unfamiliar aquarium ('novel tank'), mutant fish become immobile ('freeze'), show reduced exploratory behavior and do not habituate to this stressor upon repeated exposure. Addition of the antidepressant fluoxetine to the holding water and social interactions restore normal behavior, followed by a delayed correction of cortisol levels. Fluoxetine does not affect the overall transcription of CRH, the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), the serotonin transporter (Serta) or GR itself. Fluoxetine, however, suppresses the stress-induced upregulation of MR and Serta in both wild-type fish and mutants. Our studies show a conserved, protective function of glucocorticoid signaling in the regulation of emotional behavior and reveal novel molecular aspects of how chronic stress impacts vertebrate brain physiology and behavior. Importantly, the zebrafish model opens up the possibility of high-throughput drug screens in search of new classes of antidepressants.

A conformational switch in the ligand-binding domain regulates the dependence of the glucocorticoid receptor on Hsp90.

Steroid hormone receptors (SRs) are transcription factors that act as regulatory switches by altering gene expression in response to ligands. The highly conserved ligand-binding domain of SRs is a precise but versatile molecular switch that can adopt distinct conformations. Differential stabilization of these conformations by ligands, DNA response elements and transcriptional coregulators controls the activity of SRs in a gene-specific and cell-specific manner. In the case of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), high-affinity ligand binding requires the interaction of the LBD with the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90). Here, we show that the dependence of the ligand binding ability of GR on Hsp90 can be modified by the replacement of single amino acids within an allosteric network that connects the buried ligand-binding pocket and a solvent-exposed coregulator interaction surface. Each of the identified mutations altered the equilibrium between alternative GR conformations distinctively, indicating that the Hsp90 dependence of SRs may correlate with differences in the conformational dynamics of these receptors. Our results suggest that Hsp90 stabilizes the GR ligand-binding pocket indirectly by utilizing the allosteric network, while allowing the receptor to remain structurally uncommitted. Thus, in addition to ensuring the accessibility of the GR ligand-binding pocket to ligands, Hsp90 seems to enable hormones and coregulators to act as allosteric effectors, which forms the basis for gene-specific and cell-specific responses of GR to ligands.

Factor recruitment and TIF2/GRIP1 corepressor activity at a collagenase-3 response element that mediates regulation by phorbol esters and hormones.

To investigate determinants of specific transcriptional regulation, we measured factor occupancy and function at a response element, col3A, associated with the collagenase-3 gene in human U2OS osteosarcoma cells; col3A confers activation by phorbol esters, and repression by glucocorticoid and thyroid hormones. The subunit composition and activity of AP-1, which binds col3A, paralleled the intracellular level of cFos, which is modulated by phorbol esters and glucocorticoids. In contrast, a similar AP-1 site at the collagenase-1 gene, not inducible in U2OS cells, was not bound by AP-1. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) associated with col3A through protein-protein interactions with AP-1, regardless of AP-1 subunit composition, and repressed transcription. TIF2/GRIP1, reportedly a coactivator for GR and the thyroid hormone receptor (TR), was recruited to col3A and potentiated GR-mediated repression in the presence of a GR agonist but not antagonist. GRIP1 mutants deficient in GR binding and coactivator functions were also defective for corepression, and a GRIP1 fragment containing the GR-interacting region functioned as a dominant-negative for repression. In contrast, repression by TR was unaffected by GRIP1. Thus, the composition of regulatory complexes, and the biological activities of the bound factors, are dynamic and dependent on cell and response element contexts. Cofactors such as GRIP1 probably contain distinct surfaces for activation and repression that function in a context-dependent manner.

Continuous recycling: a mechanism for modulatory signal transduction.

Modulatory signal transduction commonly requires efficient "on demand" assembly of specific multicomponent cellular machines that convert signals to cellular actions. This article suggests that for these signaling machines to detect and respond to fluctuations in signal strength, they must be continuously disassembled in an energy-dependent process that probably involves molecular chaperones.

A genetic analysis of glucocorticoid receptor signaling. Identification and characterization of ligand-effect modulators in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

To find novel components in the glucocorticoid signal transduction pathway, we performed a yeast genetic screen to identify ligand-effect modulators (LEMs), proteins that modulate the cellular response to hormone. We isolated several mutants that conferred increased glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activity in response to dexamethasone and analyzed two of them in detail. These studies identify two genes, LEM3 and LEM4, which correspond to YNL323w and ERG6, respectively. LEM3 is a putative transmembrane protein of unknown function, and ERG6 is a methyltransferase in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway. Analysis of null mutants indicates that LEM3 and ERG6 act at different steps in the GR signal transduction pathway.

The glucocorticoid receptor inhibits NFkappaB by interfering with serine-2 phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain.

Glucocorticoids repress NFkappaB-mediated activation of proinflammatory genes such as interleukin-8 (IL-8) and ICAM-1. Our experiments suggest that the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) confers this effect by associating through protein-protein interactions with NFkappaB bound at each of these genes. That is, we show that the GR zinc binding region (ZBR), which includes the DNA binding and dimerization functions of the receptor, binds directly to the dimerization domain of the RelA subunit of NFkappaB in vitro and that the ZBR is sufficient to associate with RelA bound at NFkappaB response elements in vivo. Moreover, we demonstrate in vivo and in vitro that GR does not disrupt DNA binding by NFkappaB. In transient transfections, we found that the GR ligand binding domain is essential for repression of NFkappaB but not for association with it and that GR can repress an NFkappaB derivative bearing a heterologous activation domain. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation assays in untransfected A549 cells to infer the mechanism by which the tethered GR represses NFkappaB-activated transcription. As expected, we found that the inflammatory signal TNFalpha stimulated preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly at the IL-8 and ICAM-1 promoters and that the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (pol II) in those complexes became phosphorylated at serines 2 and 5 in its carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) heptapeptide repeats (YSPTSPS); these modifications are required for transcription initiation. Remarkably, GR did not inhibit PIC assembly under repressing conditions, but rather interfered with phosphorylation of serine 2 of the pol II CTD.

Mutations in the glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding domain mimic an allosteric effect of DNA.

Two previously isolated mutations in the glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding domain (DBD), S459A and P493R, have been postulated to mimic DNA-induced conformational changes in the glucocorticoid receptor DBD, thereby constitutively triggering an allosteric mechanism in which binding of specific DNA normally induces the exposure of otherwise silent glucocorticoid receptor transcriptional activation surfaces. Here we report the three-dimensional structure of the free S459A and P493R mutant DBDs as determined by NMR spectroscopy. The free S459A and P493R structures both display the conformational changes in the DBD dimerization interface that are characteristic of the DNA-bound wild-type DBD, confirming that these mutations mimic an allosteric effect of DNA. A transition between two packing arrangements of the DBD hydrophobic core provides a mechanism for long-range transmission of conformational changes, induced either by the mutations or by DNA binding, to protein-protein contact surfaces.

Crosstalk pathway for inhibition of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis by T cell receptor signaling.

Activation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) triggers apoptosis in T cells. However, activation of the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) blocks glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis, implying functional crosstalk between these two distinct signaling systems. By reconstructing or selectively blocking TCR-stimulated signaling pathways, we show here that TCR activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal regulated kinase (MEK/ERK) cascade via Ras is necessary and sufficient to inhibit GR-mediated death in immortalized T and thymocyte cell lines and in primary T cells. Moreover, we found that activation of various pathway components (TCR, Ras, MEK1) altered the transcriptional regulatory activity of GR. In contrast, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Akt, which down-regulate other lymphocyte apoptosis pathways, did not inhibit glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. Our findings, which link signaling from the TCR cell surface receptor to that from the GR intracellular receptor, demonstrate the importance of the integration of signal transduction pathways in defining regulatory circuits. Because the TCR/Ras/MEK pathway has been shown previously to be essential for positive selection of thymocytes, the TCR/Ras/MEK signaling to GR crosstalk described herein may affect T cell development and homeostasis.

The p23 molecular chaperones act at a late step in intracellular receptor action to differentially affect ligand efficacies.

Multiple molecular chaperones, including Hsp90 and p23, interact with members of the intracellular receptor (IR) family. To investigate p23 function, we compared the effects of three p23 proteins on IR activities, yeast p23 (sba1p) and the two human p23 homologs, p23 and tsp23. We found that Sba1p was indistinguishable from human p23 in assays of seven IR activities in both animal cells and in yeast; in contrast, certain effects of tsp23 were specific to that homolog. Transcriptional activation by two IRs was increased by expression of any of the p23 species, whereas activation by five other IRs was decreased by Sba1p or p23, and unaffected by tsp23. p23 was expressed in all tissues examined except striated and cardiac muscle, whereas tsp23 accumulated in a complementary pattern; hence, p23 proteins might contribute to tissue-specific differences in IR activities. Unlike Hsp90, which acts on IR aporeceptors to stimulate ligand potency (i.e., hormone-binding affinity), p23 proteins acted on IR holoreceptors to alter ligand efficiencies (i.e., transcriptional activation activity). Moreover, the p23 effects developed slowly, requiring prolonged exposure to hormone. In vitro, p23 interacted preferentially with hormone-receptor-response element ternary complexes, and stimulated receptor-DNA dissociation. The dissociation was reversed by addition of a fragment of the GRIP1 coactivator, suggesting that the two reactions may be in competition in vivo. Our findings suggest that p23 functions at one or more late steps in IR-mediated signal transduction, perhaps including receptor recycling and/or reversal of the response.

Regulation of expanded polyglutamine protein aggregation and nuclear localization by the glucocorticoid receptor.

Spinobulbar muscular atrophy and Huntington's disease are caused by polyglutamine expansion in the androgen receptor and huntingtin, respectively, and their pathogenesis has been associated with abnormal nuclear localization and aggregation of truncated forms of these proteins. Here we show, in diverse cell types, that glucocorticoids can up- or down-modulate aggregation and nuclear localization of expanded polyglutamine polypeptides derived from the androgen receptor and huntingtin through specific regulation of gene expression. Wild-type glucocorticoid receptor (GR), as well as C-terminal deletion derivatives, suppressed the aggregation and nuclear localization of these polypeptides, whereas mutations within the DNA binding domain and N terminus of GR abolished this activity. Surprisingly, deletion of a transcriptional regulatory domain within the GR N terminus markedly increased aggregation and nuclear localization of the expanded polyglutamine proteins. Thus, aggregation and nuclear localization of expanded polyglutamine proteins are regulated cellular processes that can be modulated by a well-characterized transcriptional regulator, the GR. Our findings suggest approaches to study the molecular pathogenesis and selective neuronal degeneration of polyglutamine expansion diseases.

An additional region of coactivator GRIP1 required for interaction with the hormone-binding domains of a subset of nuclear receptors.

Transcriptional coactivators of the p160 family (SRC-1, GRIP1, and p/CIP) associate with DNA-bound nuclear receptors (NRs) and help the NRs to recruit an active transcription initiation complex to the promoters of target genes. Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of the NR interaction domain (NID) of p160 proteins containing three NR box motifs (LXXLL) for the interaction with the hormone-binding domains of NRs. Here we report that, in addition to NID, another region of coactivator GRIP1 (amino acids 1011-1121), called the auxiliary NID (NIDaux), is required in vitro and in vivo for efficient interaction with a subset of NRs, including the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), androgen receptor, and retinoic acid receptor alpha. A second group of NRs, which includes the progesterone receptor, retinoid X receptor alpha, thyroid hormone receptor beta1, and vitamin D receptor, required only NID for efficient interaction. For binding to GR, the NID and NIDaux of GRIP1 must act in cis, but deletion of up to 144 amino acids between the two regions did not reduce binding efficiency. Amino acids 1011-1121 of GRIP1 also contain a p300 interaction domain, but mutational analysis indicated that the p300 interaction function within this region is separable from the ability to contribute to GR hormone-binding domain binding. SRC-1 lacks an NIDaux activity equivalent to that in GRIP1.

Glucocorticoid receptor transcriptional activity determined by spacing of receptor and nonreceptor DNA sites.

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) displays distinct modes of regulation when bound at glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) bearing different binding sequences and arrangements of binding sites. For example, it has been shown to activate transcription synergistically with itself or with other regulatory factors, such as AP1, when bound to a consensus palindromic element or "simple GRE" that is multimerized or linked tightly with an AP1 site. In contrast, at certain "composite GREs" GR and AP1 bind to nonconsensus sequences, and GR either activates or represses depending on the subunit composition of AP1. To uncouple the contributions to regulatory behavior of binding sequences and binding element arrangements, we examined GR action at "paired elements," combinations of a simple GRE and a consensus AP1 site, separated by different distances. We found that GR synergized with either c-Jun or c-Jun-c-Fos at paired elements with GRE-AP1 site separations of >/=26 base pairs. In contrast, paired elements with separations of 14-18 base pairs mimicked the composite GRE, i.e. GR synergized with c-Jun and repressed c-Jun-c-Fos. In DNA binding studies, GR and AP1 cooccupied the paired elements. We conclude that the arrangement of binding sites within a compound response element can be a major determinant of regulatory factor action.

Structure and specificity of nuclear receptor-coactivator interactions.

Combinatorial regulation of transcription implies flexible yet precise assembly of multiprotein regulatory complexes in response to signals. Biochemical and crystallographic analyses revealed that hormone binding leads to the formation of a hydrophobic groove within the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the thyroid hormone receptor that interacts with an LxxLL motif-containing alpha-helix from GRIP1, a coactivator. Residues immediately adjacent to the motif modulate the affinity of the interaction; the motif and the adjacent sequences are employed to different extents in binding to different receptors. Such interactions of amphipathic alpha-helices with hydrophobic grooves define protein interfaces in other regulatory complexes as well. We suggest that these common structural elements impart flexibility to combinatorial regulation, whereas side chains at the interface impart specificity.

Allosteric effects of DNA on transcriptional regulators.

Selective gene transcription is mediated in part by regulatory proteins that bind to DNA response elements. These regulatory proteins receive global information from signal-transduction events. But transcriptional regulators may also be modified in an allosteric manner by response elements themselves to generate the pattern of regulation that is appropriate to an individual gene.

Mitogen-activated and cyclin-dependent protein kinases selectively and differentially modulate transcriptional enhancement by the glucocorticoid receptor.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylate the rat glucocorticoid receptor in vitro at distinct sites that together correspond to the major phosphorylated receptor residues observed in vivo; MAPK phosphorylates receptor residues threonine 171 and serine 246, whereas multiple CDK complexes modify serines 224 and 232. Mutations in these kinases have opposite effects on receptor transcriptional activity in vivo. Receptor-dependent transcriptional enhancement is reduced in yeast strains deficient in the catalytic (p34CDC28) or certain regulatory (cyclin) subunits of CDK complexes and is increased in a strain devoid of the mammalian MAPK homologs FUS3 and KSS1. These findings indicate that the glucocorticoid receptor is a target for multiple kinases in vivo, which either positively or negatively regulate receptor transcriptional enhancement. The control of receptor transcriptional activity via phosphorylation provides an increased array of regulatory inputs that, in addition to steroid hormones, can influence receptor function.

Three amino acid substitutions selectively disrupt the activation but not the repression function of the glucocorticoid receptor N terminus.

A 210-amino acid region, termed enh2, near the N terminus of the rat glucocorticoid receptor, is necessary for both transcriptional activation and repression. The mechanism(s) of transcriptional regulation conferred by this region, however, are poorly understood. We screened in Saccharomyces cerevisiae a library of random mutants in the enh2 region of a constitutive glucocorticoid receptor derivative and isolated a series of multiply substituted receptors that are specifically defective in transcriptional activation. Although many substitutions in this area were tolerated, three amino acid substitutions (E219K, F220L, and W234R) within a 16-amino acid region were sufficient to disrupt the enh2 transcriptional activation function both in yeast and in mammalian cells. Although this region is rich in acidic residues, the conserved tryptophan at position 234 appears to be a more critical feature for enh2 activity; hydrophobic but not charged residues were tolerated at this position. Notably, the mutants uncoupled the activation and repression functions of enh2, as the activation defective isolates remained competent for repression of AP-1 at the composite response element plfG.

Identification of functional surfaces of the zinc binding domains of intracellular receptors.

Transcriptional regulatory factor complexes assemble on genomic response elements to control gene expression. To gain insights on the surfaces that determine this assembly in the zinc binding domains from intracellular receptors, we systematically analyzed the variations in sequence and function of those domains in the context of their invariant fold. Taking the intracellular receptor superfamily as a whole revealed a hierarchy of amino acid residues along the DNA interface that correlated with response element binding specificity. When only steroid receptors were considered, two additional sites appeared: the known dimer interface, and a novel putative interface suitably located to contact regulatory factors bound to the free face of palindromic response elements commonly used by steroid receptors. Surprisingly, retinoic acid receptors, not known to bind palindromic response elements, contain both of these surfaces, implying that they may dimerize at palindromic elements under some circumstances. This work extends Evolutionary Trace analysis of functional surfaces to protein-DNA interactions, suggests how coordinated exchange of trace residues may predictably switch binding specificity, and demonstrates how to detect functional surfaces that are not apparent from sequence comparison alone.

Adenovirus E1A specifically blocks SWI/SNF-dependent transcriptional activation.

Expression of the adenovirus E1A243 oncoprotein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces a slow-growth phenotype with accumulation of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This effect is due to the N-terminal and CR1 domains of E1A243, which in rodent cells are involved in triggering cellular transformation and also in binding to the cellular transcriptional coactivator p300. A genetic screen was undertaken to identify genes required for the function of E1A243 in S. cerevisiae. This screen identified SNF12, a gene encoding the 73-kDa subunit of the SWI/SNF transcriptional regulatory complex. Mutation of genes encoding known members of the SWI/SNF complex also led to loss of E1A function, suggesting that the SWI/SNF complex is a target of E1A243. Moreover, expression of E1A in wild-type cells specifically blocked transcriptional activation of the INO1 and SUC2 genes, whose activation pathways are distinct but have a common requirement for the SWI/SNF complex. These data demonstrate a specific functional interaction between E1A and the SWI/SNF complex and suggest that a similar interaction takes place in rodent and human cells.