Aripiprazole in the real-world treatment for irritability associated with autism spectrum disorder in children and adolescents in Japan: 52-week post-marketing surveillance.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the post-marketing safety and effectiveness of aripiprazole in treating irritability in pediatric patients (6-17 years) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in actual clinical sites of Japan. METHODS: In this post-marketing surveillance, patients were enrolled into the multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, observational study for 52 weeks, and were dosed with aripiprazole (1-15 mg/day) under daily clinical settings in Japan. RESULTS: In 510 patients, the continuation rate of aripiprazole treatment was 84.6% at day 168 (week 24) and 78.1% at day 364 (week 52). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 22.7% of patients (n = 116), and the most common ADRs were somnolence (9.4%), followed by weight increased (3.3%). At week 4, the mean change from baseline in the irritability subscale score for the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Japanese version (ABC-J) was - 5.7 ± 6.8 (n = 288). Based on multiple regression analysis, comorbid attention deficit and hyperactivity did not affect the ABC-J irritability subscale score at endpoint. At week 24, the mean change from baseline for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire was - 3.3 ± 4.9 (n = 215) for the total difficulties score and 0.6 ± 1.7 (n = 217) for the prosocial behavior subscale score. CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole was well tolerated and effective in the long-term treatment of irritability associated with ASD in Japanese pediatric patients in the real-world clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This surveillance was registered with Clinical Trial.gov (no. NCT03179787 ) on June 7, 2017 (retrospectively registered).

Real-world effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole augmentation therapy in patients with major depressive disorder.

AIMS: Augmentation therapy is an option for patients with major depressive disorder who do respond sufficiently to adequate dosages of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, but little is known about application of this strategy in everyday practice. METHODS: This prospective, multi-center, observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole augmentation in Japanese patients with inadequate response to conventional antidepressant therapy in real-world clinical practice. The primary endpoint was mean change in the (Japanese version) Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to study end. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. RESULTS: There were 1103 patients in the safety population and 1090 patients in the effectiveness population. Mean change in the MADRS total score at study end was -14.9 ± 12.3 (p < .001 vs baseline). The remission rate increased from 34.5% at Month 6 to 43.3% at Month 12, suggesting additional benefit with continued treatment. The type of primary antidepressant (paroxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, milnacipran, duloxetine, mirtazapine, or escitalopram) had no influence on the effectiveness of aripiprazole augmentation therapy. A baseline MADRS total score of <33 points and an elapsed time of <176 days from an episode of depression to the start of aripiprazole treatment increased the likelihood of achieving remission; 24.8% of patients experienced at least one adverse event, but no new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole augmentation therapy appears to be effective and safe in Japanese patients with depression/depressive symptoms treated in everyday clinical practice, taking into account factors associated with achieving remission.

[Adjunctive Therapy with Levetiracetam for Elderly Japanese with Partial Epilepsy: Effectiveness of Levetiracetam in Seizure Management of Epilepsy Patients with Advanced-age Onset in a Practical Setting].

This prospective, nationwide, specified drug use-results survey investigated the effects of levetiracetam (LEV) in elderly individuals with partial-onset seizures of advanced-age onset in a practical setting. Participants comprised LEV-naïve patients with onset of focal epilepsy at ≥50 years old and management by at least one antiepileptic drug. Efficacy measures were the physician-rated global improvement scale (GIS), and proportions of patients showing 50% and 100% seizure reduction by comparing seizure frequency during the 4-week pre-treatment period and the last 4 weeks of the 25-week treatment period. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and retention rate were also evaluated. Data for safety, GIS evaluation, and seizure frequency analyses were available from 105, 78, and 76, respectively, of 116 enrolled patients, 83 (71.55%) of whom were enrolled by neurosurgeons. Improvement rate (improved or markedly improved) as determined by GIS was 98.72% (77/78). Seventy-four (97.37%) and 64 patients (84.21%) showed 50% and 100% seizure reduction, respectively. Incidence of ADRs was 12.38%, including one serious ADR (mania). LEV retention rate remained high at the end of the 25-week treatment period (96.00%). LEV appears efficacious and well-tolerated in elderly patients with focal epilepsy. Including LEV in the treatment regimen may allow elderly patients to achieve freedom from seizures.