[Questionnaire Survey of Hands-on Seminar Using a Web Conferencing System in the COVID-19 Pandemic].

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a hands-on seminar using a Web conferencing system, based on the post-event questionnaires of the face-to-face and online seminars of the hands-on seminar. For participants to feel realistic training in the online seminars, four educational videos explaining the procedure of the practical skill were created. We compared results of questionnaires acquired from participants after the face-to-face and online seminars. The questions about expectation, comprehension, satisfaction level, and lecture time for the seminars were graded on a 5-point scale. The higher the scores, the higher the rating, except for lecture time. A score of 3 was appropriate for the lecture time, with a higher score indicating that the seminar felt longer and a lower score indicating that the seminar felt shorter. In the evaluation of classroom lectures, such as expectation, comprehension, and satisfaction level for the seminars, there were no significant differences between the face-to-face and online seminars, and both achieved high scores of 4 or more. There was a significant difference in the evaluation of lecture time for classroom lectures, with participants feeling that it was too short in the face-to-face but just right in the online. In all evaluations for hands-on training and discussion, there were no significant differences between the face-to-face and online seminars, and both achieved high scores of 4 or more and time was short. It was concluded that our proposed online seminar approach could achieve a high level of evaluation as face-to-face seminars.

[Utility of Point Dose Verification Using Measured Ionization Amount Ratio of Reference Irradiation to Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy].

In the point dose verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), we compared the commonly used method of measuring absolute dose (absolute method) with the measurement method by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 119, which describes the point dose verification for IMRT using the ratio of reference irradiation and measured ionization. The target was 66 plans for head and neck cancer, 46 plans for lung cancer with 6 MV X-ray, and 31 plans for prostate cancer with 10 MV X-ray. They were treated with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Each plan was evaluated by the absolute method and the TG119 method using 3D-array. The average and 2SD of the verification results for head and neck cancer, lung cancer, and prostate cancer were 0.129±2.185%, 0.963±2.125%, and 0.259±2.019% by the absolute method, and 0.952±2.039%, 1.704±2.080%, and 0.524±1.274% by the TG119 method. The ratio between the average of the TG119 method and the absolute method corresponded to the error of reference irradiation dose. Considering that the measurement method is simple, the TG119 method enables more stable point dose verification of VMAT.