Intensive care burden of COVID-19 in tertiary care hospitals during the first year of outbreak in Kawasaki City, Japan: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe the changes in the intensive care burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the first year of outbreak in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included COVID-19 patients who received mechanical ventilation (MV) support in two designated hospitals for critical patients in Kawasaki City. We compared the lengths of MV and stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) or high care unit (HCU) according to the three epidemic waves. We calculated in-hospital mortality rates in patients with or without MV. RESULTS: The median age of the sample was 65.0 years, and 22.7% were women. There were 37, 29, and 62 patients in the first (W1), second (W2), and third waves (W3), respectively. Systemic steroids, remdesivir, and prone positioning were more frequent in W2 and W3. The median length of MV decreased from 18.0 days in W1 to 13.0 days in W3 (P = 0.019), and that of ICU/HCU stay decreased from 22.0 days in W1 to 15.5 days in W3 (P = 0.027). The peak daily number of patients receiving MV support was higher at 18 patients in W1, compared to 8 and 15 patients in W2 and W3, respectively. The mortality rate was 23.4%, which did not significantly change (P = 0.467). CONCLUSIONS: The lengths of MV and ICU/HCU stay per patient decreased over time. Despite an increase in the number of COVID-19 patients who received MV in W3, this study may indicate that the intensive care burden during the study period did not substantially increase.

Efficacy of awake prone positioning for severe illness coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a propensity score-adjusted cohort study.

AIM: Awake prone positioning (PP) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can improve oxygenation. However, evidence showing that it can prevent intubation is lacking. This study investigated the efficacy of awake PP in patients with COVID-19 who received remdesivir, dexamethasone, and anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: This was a two-center cohort study. Patients admitted to the severe COVID-19 patient unit were included. The primary outcome was the intubation rate and secondary outcome was length of stay in the severe COVID-19 unit. After propensity score adjustment, we undertook multivariable regression to calculate the estimates of outcomes between patients who received awake PP and those who did not. RESULTS: Overall, 108 patients were included (54 [50.0%] patients each who did and did not undergo awake PP), of whom 25 (23.2%) were intubated (with awake PP, 5 [9.3%] vs. without awake PP, 20 [37.0%]; P < 0.01). The median length of stay in the severe COVID-19 unit did not significantly differ (with awake PP, 5 days vs. without awake PP, 5.5 days; P = 0.68). After propensity score adjustment, those who received awake PP had a lower intubation rate than those who did not (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.85; P = 0.03). Length of stay in the severe COVID-19 patient unit did not differ significantly (adjusted percentage difference, -24.4%; 95% confidence interval, -56.3% to 30.8%; P = 0.32). CONCLUSION: Awake PP could be correlated with intubation rate in patients with COVID-19 who are receiving remdesivir, dexamethasone, and anticoagulant therapy.

The Association Between Early Administration of Noninvasive Ventilation and Short-Term Outcome for Acute Heart Failure.

Background Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a life-threatening disease that requires emergent intervention. Although noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is crucial for treating ADHF, the earliest time point for administering NPPV remains unknown. In this study, we hypothesized that early NPPV administration for patients with acute heart failure in the emergency department (ED) would lead to a better outcome. Methodology This is a single-center retrospective cohort study at an ED of a community hospital in Japan. The data were collected from consecutive patients who were administered NPPV for ADHF in the ED from April 2016 to September 2018. The primary exposure was the timing of NPPV administration (within 30 minutes versus over 30 minutes after arrival). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Results A total of 115 patients were included in this study. Overall, the median age was 78 (interquartile range [IQR] = 70-84 years), and 63 (54.9%) patients were male. The median time from the arrival at the ED to NPPV administration for the patients was 14 minutes (IQR = 8-30 minutes). Overall, 72% (83/115) of the patients were categorized as early administration group (<30 minutes). The total 30-day mortality was 7.0% (8/115), and the total tracheal intubation rate was 11% (13/115). Early NPPV administration for patients with ADHF was associated with lower 30-day mortality (3.6% vs. 16%; p = 0.04) and shorter length of oxygenation (four days vs. seven days; p < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression test showed that 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the early treatment group (adjusted odds ratio = 0.19; 95% confidential interval = 0.04-0.90). Conclusions Although further investigation is needed, early NPPV administration for patients with ADHF in the ED was associated with lower 30-day mortality.