Estimulación cerebral profunda: tratamiento para pacientes con diagnóstico de trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo resistente / Deep brain stimulation: treatment for patients diagnosed with disorder obsessive-compulsive resistant

El trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo (TOC) afecta al 2% de la población general, llegando en ocasiones a causar un deterioro funcional severo y de la calidad de vida de las personas afectadas. Entre el 10 y el 30% de los pacientes con este trastorno no responde a los tratamientos recomendados: farmacológicos y terapia cognitivo-conductual. La Food and Drug Administration de los Estados Unidos (FDA) aprobó en el año 2008 la Estimulación cerebral profunda (ECP) para pacientes con TOC resistente a tratamiento. La ECP, utilizada frecuentemente para el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Parkinson refractaria, es una opción viable para los pacientes con TOC resistente, con efectos adversos poco frecuentes y transitorios. (AU)

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects 2% of the general population, sometimes resulting in severe impairment of functional capacity and quality of life of affected people. Between 10 and 30% of these patients do not respond to recommended treatments: pharmacological and cognitive behavioral therapy. In 2008, the FDA approved Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for patients with OCD resistant to treatment. DBS, frequently used for the treatment of refractory Parkinson's disease, is a viable option for the treatment of patients with resistant OCD, with infrequent and transient adverse effects. (AU)

Unsuccessful pulsed radiofrequency of the sphenopalatine ganglion in patients with chronic cluster headache and subsequent successful thermocoagulation.

We present the results of pulsed and continuous radiofrequency (CRF) of the sphenopalatine ganglion in a case series of 3 patients with chronic cluster headache (CCH). Three patients were referred to our neurosurgical department because of CCH, which was refractory to pharmacological treatment. They underwent pulsed radiofrequency of the sphenopalatine ganglion (PRF-SPG), and the procedure was performed through an infrazygomatic approach. In the PRF procedures, we applied 2 cycles of PRF at 42°C and 45 V for 120 seconds, with a pulse frequency of 2 Hz and a pulse width of 20 ms. In those procedures where thermocoagulation was carried out, 2 CRF lesions at 80°C for 90 seconds each were performed. Following corticosteroid and local anesthetic (40 mg of methylprednisolone and 1 mL of 1% lidocaine) injection, 2 patients had no pain relief at all, whereas the third one experienced a partial response, which lasted only 1 month and his pain then returned to its baseline level. Thus, this outcome was assessed as a nonsustained partial response. Therefore, all of them underwent a CRF lesioning of the SPG, and after this procedure, they achieved complete pain relief until the end of the follow-up period. Furthermore, the associated autonomic manifestations disappeared. The 3 patients presented in this case series failed to achieve adequate pain relief after PRF-SPG. However, these same patients subsequently underwent a successful CRF of the SPG.