RESUMO
Background: In recent years, fracture liaison services (FLS) have been applied for hip fractures; however, their effectiveness remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of FLS in patients with hip fractures. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Data sources: Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ebsco, Ovid, Web of Science, Medline, CNKI, Wangfang, and Vip were searched from their date of inception to March 2023. Two researchers screened the literature based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the quality, extracted data, and conducted a meta-analysis using ReviewManager 5.4. Results: After screening, 12 randomised controlled trials (RCT) including 2136 patients were used in the meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were hip function rate of recurrent fracture, medication adherence, and degree of weakness. FLS improved hip function in patients with hip fractures [MD = 9.37, 95 % CI (7.69, 11.06), P < 0.0001], P < 0.0001], medication adherence [OR = 10.59, 95 % CI (1.64, 68.41), Pï¼0.0001], degree of weakness [MD = -1.45, 95%CI (-1.68ï¼-1.23), Pï¼0.0001], and reduced the rate of recurrent fractures [OR = 0.60, 95 % CI (0.44, 0.82). Conclusion: Implementation of the FLS management model was beneficial for patients with hip fractures. It can positively impact the prognosis of patients with hip fractures by improving hip function, reducing the rate of recurrent fractures, and improving medication adherence and degree of weakness.
RESUMO
Objective: Wound healing is delayed because of swelling after upper limb fracture, and the traditional rehabilitation device used in physical therapy cannot flexibly adjust the fixation. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the designed elbow joint airbag protection device used in patients with upper arm fractures. Methods: This is a quasi-randomized controlled trial. From November 2022 to March 2023, 70 hospitalized patients with unilateral upper arm fractures were recruited from a general tertiary hospital in eastern China. The patients were divided into an experimental group and a control group according to the random number table at 1:1. Among them, 35 patients who received elbow joint airbag protection for post-traumatic limb swelling were assigned to the experimental group, and the other 35 patients were assigned to the control group. The degree of swelling regression, a score of resting pain, and patient comfort level was compared between the two groups. Results: The waiting time from swelling to allowing for surgery and pain score at rest were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P < .05 and P < .001 respectively). The comfort score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (P < .05), and these differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: The elbow joint airbag protection can significantly reduce the waiting time for surgery, lessen the degree of swelling regression, reduce the pain in patients' hands caused by swelling, and significantly improve the comfort level. Hence, it is worth promoting in the clinical practice of orthopedic nursing.
