Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of a self-reported screening tool in the prediction of fall incidence in older adults.

Background: The Chinese HomeFAST self-reported screening tool was developed to measure the number of hazards and the risk of home falls and other accidents for community-living older adults.Methods: This reliability, validity, and clinical utility study consisted of three phases. The tool's linguistic validity was established in the first phase of study, with a panel of domiciliary healthcare experts. In the second phase, the instrument yielded inter-rater reliability between community-living older adults and a group of experienced occupational therapists. Furthermore, in the third phase of study, factor analysis of the Chinese Home-FAST self-reported screening tool was conducted.Results: There was good linguistic validity, test-retest reliability and good to excellent internal consistency of the Chinese Home-FAST self-reported screening tool among older adults living in the community. Moreover, a structure with three factors - namely "Home Environment and Furniture," "Capability in Activities of Daily Living," and "Use of Devices" - was yielded from categorical principal components analysis. Clinically, the incidence of falls among this group of recruited older adults in a six-month period was 18%. The identification of seven or more hazards was associated with prediction of unplanned fall-related hospital admission with sensitivity of 83.33% and specificity of 95.83%. Conclusion: The Chinese HomeFAST self-reported screening tool is thus demonstrated to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring home hazards and can predict home falls in Chinese-speaking older adults.Implications for rehabilitationTo develop an easily understandable screening tool for older adults.Older adults can perform home safety screening on their own, and can identify potential risk of falls and other accidents at home.This can serve as a communication tool between older adults and healthcare professionals.Identified hazards can be reported to healthcare professionals for further intervention.This validated instrument can help healthcare professionals to identify higher-risk older adults in the community and thus to better prioritize their provision of professional services.

Usability of a virtual reality environment simulating an automated teller machine for assessing and training persons with acquired brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the usability of a newly designed virtual reality (VR) environment simulating the operation of an automated teller machine (ATM) for assessment and training. DESIGN: Part I involved evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a non-immersive VR program simulating an ATM (VR-ATM). Part II consisted of a clinical trial providing baseline and post-intervention outcome assessments. SETTING: A rehabilitation hospital and university-based teaching facilities were used as the setting. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 24 persons in the community with acquired brain injury (ABI)--14 in Part I and 10 in Part II--made up the participants in the study. INTERVENTIONS: In Part I, participants were randomized to receive instruction in either an "early" or a "late" VR-ATM program and were assessed using both the VR program and a real ATM. In Part II, participants were assigned in matched pairs to either VR training or computer-assisted instruction (CAI) teaching programs for six 1-hour sessions over a three-week period. OUTCOME MEASURES: Two behavioral checklists based on activity analysis of cash withdrawals and money transfers using a real ATM were used to measure average reaction time, percentage of incorrect responses, level of cues required, and time spent as generated by the VR system; also used was the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the VR-ATM was 100% for cash withdrawals and 83.3% for money transfers, and the specificity was 83% and 75%, respectively. For cash withdrawals, the average reaction time of the VR group was significantly shorter than that of the CAI group (p = 0.021). We found no significant differences in average reaction time or accuracy between groups for money transfers, although we did note positive improvement for the VR-ATM group. CONCLUSION: We found the VR-ATM to be usable as a valid assessment and training tool for relearning the use of ATMs prior to real-life practice in persons with ABI.