Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 89(10): 859-866, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37307030

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper was to explore pupillary monitoring for determining remifentanil consumption during general anesthesia and evaluating postoperative recovery quality. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing elective laparoscopic uterine surgery were randomly divided into pupillary monitoring group (Group P) and control group (Group C). In Group P, remifentanil dosage during general anesthesia was determined according to pupil dilation reflex; in Group C, it was adjusted according to hemodynamic changes. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption and endotracheal tube extraction time were recorded. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score, hemodynamic changes, and opioid-related adverse reactions in the post-anesthesia care unit were also recorded. The parameters of pupil light reflex from extubation to 30 min after extubation were analyzed in Group P, and the responsiveness of these parameters and hemodynamic changes to NRS was determined by ROC curve analyses. RESULTS: Compared with Group C, in Group P, intraoperative remifentanil consumption, the NRS Score at 20 minutes after extubation, extubation time, and the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and respiratory amnesia were all significantly decreased (all, P<0.05). In Group P, ∆HR and ∆MAP had no value in judging the change of NRS. The ROC values and diagnostic cutoff values of ΔInit, ΔACV, and ΔMCV responding to NRS variation were 0.775 (95% CI: 0.582-0.968), 0.734(95% CI: 0.537-0.930), and 0.822 (95% CI: 0.648-0.997) and 0.21 (sensitivity, 92.3%; specificity, 23.1%), -1.3 (sensitivity, 92.3%; specificity, 18.3%), and -1.0 (sensitivity, 84.6%; specificity, 17.7%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative pupil dilation reflex monitoring can reduce remifentanil consumption and improve postoperative recovery quality. Furthermore, postoperative pupil light reflex monitoring can help evaluate pain degree with high sensitivity.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Pupila , Humanos , Remifentanil , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Dor Pós-Operatória
2.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 19(9): 1633-1642, 2023 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37128727

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We explored the effects of stellate ganglion block on postoperative sleep disturbance in patients scheduled to undergo radical surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies. METHODS: Forty such patients were randomly assigned to the control group (Group C) or the preoperative stellate ganglion block treatment group (Group S). Using actigraphy, sleep quality was evaluated on the first night before the operation and first, second, and third postoperative nights. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scale was used for sleep state assessment on 1 day preoperatively and the first, second, third, fifth, and seventh days postoperatively. Plasma interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and IL-10 and melatonin levels were checked at 1 day preoperatively and the first and third days postoperatively. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded before general anesthesia induction, immediately after tracheal intubation, at the beginning of the operation, 1 and 2 hours after the beginning of the operation, at the end of the operation, immediately after extubation, and 30 minutes after transfer to the postanesthesia care unit. RESULTS: Compared with Group C, in Group S sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and sleep maintenance were increased and sleep period change index, number of awakenings, wake after sleep onset, and body movements were reduced on the first and second postoperative nights; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores and occurrence of postoperative sleep disturbance were lower on the first and second nights postoperatively; IL-6 was reduced on the first night postoperatively; IL-1 and IL-10 were reduced on the third night postoperatively; melatonin was increased on the first night postoperatively; and mean arterial pressure and heart rate were decreased before general anesthesia induction, immediately after tracheal intubation, and at the end of the operation (all P < .05). Conclusions: Stellate ganglion block alleviates postoperative sleep disturbance by reducing postoperative inflammatory response, increasing melatonin levels, and stabilizing perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: The Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Postoperative Sleep Disturbance and Cognitive Function in Elderly Surgical Patients; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04800653; Identifier: NCT04800653. CITATION: Yan S, Wang Y, Yu L, et al. Stellate ganglion block alleviates postoperative sleep disturbance in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(9):1633-1642.


Assuntos
Interleucina-10 , Melatonina , Humanos , Idoso , Interleucina-10/farmacologia , Interleucina-6 , Gânglio Estrelado , Melatonina/farmacologia , Melatonina/uso terapêutico , Sono
3.
Pain Ther ; 12(3): 683-694, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36884108

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Rocuronium intravenous pain is common in induction of general anesthesia. The aim of our study was to determine the median effective dose (ED50) of prophylactic intravenous remifentanil for the prevention of rocuronium injection pain and to explore the effect of age on the ED50. METHODS: Eighty-nine adult patients undergoing elective general anesthesia, ASA I or II, regardless of gender or weight, were stratified according to age: group R1 18-44 years, group R2 45-59 years, and group R3 60-80 years. The initial dose of prophylactic remifentanil before rocuronium injection was set at 1 µg/kg lean body weight (LBW). The remifentanil doses were adjusted according to the degree of injection pain using the Dixon sequential method, with a ratio of 1.1 between adjacent doses. Injection pain was graded, and the occurrence of injection pain and adverse reactions were recorded. The ED50 and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of remifentanil were calculated using the Dixon-Massey formula. Patients were asked whether they recalled feeling any injection pain in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). RESULTS: The ED50 (95% CIs) of prophylactic remifentanil for the prevention of rocuronium injection pain were 1.266 µg/kg (1.186-1.351 µg/kg), 1.188 µg/kg (1.065-1.324 µg/kg), and 1.070 µg/kg (1.014-1.129 µg/kg) LBW in group R1, group R2, and group R3, respectively. No adverse reactions to remifentanil occurred in any group. In PACU, 84.6, 86.7, and 85.7% of patients who experienced injection pain had memories of the pain in group R1, group R2, and group R3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic intravenous remifentanil can prevent rocuronium injection pain, and its ED50 decreases with age, with 1.266 µg/kg (18-44 years), 1.188 µg/kg (45-59 years), and 1.070 µg/kg LBW (60-80 years), respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05217238 (registration date 18 Dec 2021).

4.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 271, 2022 08 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36008759

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine has controversial influence on cardiac electrophysiology. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of dexmedetomidine on perioperative cardiac electrophysiology in patients undergoing general anesthesia. METHODS: Eighty-one patients were randomly divided into four groups: groups D1, D2, D3 receiving dexmedetomidine 1, 1, 0.5 µg/kg over 10 min and 1, 0.5, 0.5 µg/kg/h continuous infusion respectively, and control group (group C) receiving normal saline. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms were recorded at the time before dexmedetomidine/normal saline infusion (T1), loading dose finish (T2), surgery ending (T6), 1 h (T7) after entering PACU, 24 h (T8), 48 h (T9), 72 h (T10) and 1 month (T11) postoperatively. Cardiac circulation efficiency (CCE) were also recorded. RESULTS: Compared with group C, QTc were significantly increased at T2 in groups D1 and D2 while decreased at T7 and T8 in group D3 (P < 0.05), iCEB were decreased at T8 (P < 0.05). Compared with group D1, QTc at T2, T6, T7, T9 and T10 and iCEB at T8 were decreased, and CCE at T2-T4 were increased in group D3 significantly (P < 0.05). Compared with group D2, QTc at T2 and iCEB at T8 were decreased and CCE at T2 and T3 were increased in group D3 significantly (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine at a loading dose of 0.5 µg/kg and a maintenance dose of 0.5 µg/kg/h can maintain stability of cardiac electrophysiology during perioperative period and has no significant adverse effects on CCE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04577430 (Date of registration: 06/10/2020).


Assuntos
Dexmedetomidina , Anestesia Geral , Dexmedetomidina/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Humanos , Solução Salina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...