Coagulation dysfunction of severe burn patients: A potential cause of death.

BACKGROUND: Research on coagulation dysfunction following burns is controversial. This study aimed to describe the coagulation changes in severe burn patients by examining coagulation parameters. METHODS: Patients with third-degree total body surface area (TBSA) burns of ≥30% were enrolled between 2017 and 2020. Platelet (PLT) count and coagulation indexes (including APTT, INR, FIB, DD, and AT Ⅲ) were measured at admission and once weekly for 8 weeks, and statistical analysis was performed. The patient medical profiles were reviewed to extract demographic and clinical data, including TBSA, third-degree TBSA, and inhalation injury. The total intravenous fluids and transfusions of crystalloids, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and red blood cells (RBC) were calculated during the forty-eight-hour period. The number of sepsis cases was recorded. RESULTS: We enrolled 104 patients , and while the overall coagulation trend fluctuated, inflection points appeared around one week and demonstrated hypercoagulability. INR was significantly higher in the non-survival group than in the survivors' group from admission to three weeks after burn (all p<0.01). From post-injury week 1 to post-injury week 3, the APTT in the non-survival group was greater than in the survival group, but the non-survival group's PLT count was lower than that in the survival group (all p<0.05). At two and three weeks after burns, the FIB levels in the non-survival group were significantly lower than those of the survival group (both p<0.01). The prevalence of inhalation injury and the proportion of sepsis cases were significantly higher in the non-survival group than in the survival group ( p ＜ 0.05, p ＜ 0.001, respectively). At the time of death, APTT, INR, and FDP levels were significantly higher in the non-survival group in the survivor group, and FIB, ATIII, and PLT were significantly lower than in the survivor group (all p<0.01). On the day of death, nine of the 12 dead patients had disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). CONCLUSIONS: Coagulation dysfunction was most prominent in severe burn patients 1 week after injury and presented as hypercoagulability. Large-area burn injury, large amounts of fluid resuscitation, inhalation injury, and sepsis may all contribute to coagulation dysfunction, which can further develop into DIC and even death in severe burns patients.

[The Expression of CD40/CD40L in MM Patients and Its Significance to the Prognosis of MM Patients].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the expression of CD40/CD40L in multiple myeloma(MM) patients and its influence on prognosis. METHODS: Thirty patients with MM treated in Cangzhou People's Hospital from May 2016 to June 2017 were selected and divided into MM group, then 30 healthy people with a physical examination in our hospital at the same time were selected as the normal group. The serum CD40/CD40L levels of the patients in the two groups was detected by flow cytometry, and its correlation with the lymphocyte population, pathological grade and prognostic significance of MM patients was anaysis. RESULTS: The expression of CD40 in serum of the patients in MM group was significantly higher than those in normal group (P<0.05). The expression of CD40L in serum of the patients in MM group showed no significant difference as compared with those in normal group (P>0.05). The levels of CD40 and CD40L in the patients before and after chemotherapy showed no difference(P>0.05). The levels of Ts and NK cells in the patients of MM group were lower than those in normal group (P<0.05). The proportion of total B lymphocytes, Th and Th/Ts cells between the two groups showed no significant difference (P>0.05). The CD40 level was correlated with the serum total B lymphocyte level of the patients in MM group (r=0.877, P=0.005). There was a correlation with CD40L and Th cells in the serum of MM patients (r=-0.783, P=0.035). The expression of serum CD40 in the patients at phase III-IV was higher than those of the patients at phase I-II, the levels of serum CD40L in MM patients at different periods showed no significant difference(P>0.05). The survival rate of MM patients with high CD40 expression was lower than that of MM patients with low CD40 expression (χ2=1.639, P=0.201). The high level CD40 was the main factor affecting the prognosis of MM patients (95%CI: 1.156-4.125). CONCLUSION: The increasing of CD40 level in MM patients is related to the pathological grade of the patients. Chemotherapy can reduce the level of CD40. The increasing of CD40 is an important factor for the poor prognosis of MM patients. CD40L level is not meaningful for MM treatment and prognosis.